notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
StiflersMom wrote:Or don't torrent ..www.warez-bb.org I didn't say anything about torrenting.
|
|
|
|
StiflersMom
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
Or don't torrent ..www.warez-bb.org
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Condemned666 wrote: ^ That is all Shit on the Simpsons all you like, but the show has outlasted them all!
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Just remember In a capitalist system, the only evolution for things like entertainment to make is to make it exclusive and inaccessible to the masses
If you want something if quality/ note, youre going to have to pay for it!
Thats the only evolution in the entertainment industry!
[/santa's a commie!]
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
This is amusing. People will simply stop watching shows instead.
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
 ^ That is all
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
The thing is: the tipping point was when people had to pay for quality tv, when in the day you didnt have to.
Only movies, and plays. Because a movie looks like crap on a crt 4:3 screen :-K
Anyway, while the internet has done a great service in opening up access to knowledge and art (philosophy) and all things esoteric, which could and should have made the world better, it is the level playing field, through the clicking of a mouse, where wanting to watch high end art, is the same as watching cat videos or "leave britney alone" rants on youtube.
Monetising the internet could be the way to go to filter out the quality? Personally i dont mind paying for Synecdoche New York, vs someone's cat video. Its pretty much the equivalent as buying the newspaper vs picking up the mx newspaper at the train station
[/rant]
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
99 Problems wrote:notorganic wrote:99 Problems wrote:Private Internet access. Does the job for me, most reviews for it are really good. Could be some free or cheaper ones out there just as good though. I'm using PIA too, but really unhappy with its speed. Checking around for other options. I was struggling with speed with PIA but it has improved a lot for me in the last few months. I use Express. Speeds are good but depending on how serious you are on the "privacy" side of things they might not be a good fit. The meet my criteria well enough and the odd time I need to grab a "linux distro" via BT there are plenty of servers in favourable locations.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
99 Problems
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:99 Problems wrote:Private Internet access. Does the job for me, most reviews for it are really good. Could be some free or cheaper ones out there just as good though. I'm using PIA too, but really unhappy with its speed. Checking around for other options. I was struggling with speed with PIA but it has improved a lot for me in the last few months.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
But they still have server in Australia? -PB
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
roary's mane wrote:Probably a separate thread for this... but any VPNs you guys recommend? A few of my mates use IPVanish? Ideally you want something that is fast, isn't HQ'd in a "Five Eyes" nation and doesn't keep logs. https://torrentfreak.com/anonymous-vpn-service-provider-review-2015-150228/
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
99 Problems wrote:Private Internet access. Does the job for me, most reviews for it are really good. Could be some free or cheaper ones out there just as good though. I'm using PIA too, but really unhappy with its speed. Checking around for other options.
|
|
|
99 Problems
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Private Internet access. Does the job for me, most reviews for it are really good. Could be some free or cheaper ones out there just as good though.
|
|
|
roarys mane
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Probably a separate thread for this... but any VPNs you guys recommend? A few of my mates use IPVanish?
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
The bottom line is
Basically in a capitalist society with regards to things like entertainment, in order to access superior products, it should be more exclusive to the people who want better, as opposed to the generic free stuff that is accessible to the general public.
Ie when pay tv came along, Quality programming migrated there, as part if the evolution of television. The Internet has served to be a grand disservice to things that contain 'intellectual property'. Its great the general Internet public can access a film like Synecdoche, New York or Lars Von Trier's Melancholia, but the same action is done to access high art films such as those (a click of a mouse) or looking up cat videos on YouTube
There has to be a line drawn somewhere!
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Netflix Australia seems to have better movies than US. Canada is best for content. Yeah I've used this a couple of times to find something I really wanted to watch https://netflixaroundtheworld.com/
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:
I just had a look at my local cinemas website, if I took my wife and kid to see FnF tomorrow in the middle of the day it would cost me just under $60 before going anywhere near the confection stand.
Rusty's strawman (as usual) example does nothing to dispel an already proven strategy to minimise media copyright infringement.
Edited by notorganic: 9/4/2015 12:10:37 AM
Sure it might somewhat reduce illegal downloads, but despite content being made cheap and accessible (i.e. Netflix) illegal download will continue to occur in large volumes. Your argument that cheap accessible content will bring an end to the piracy industry is plain wrong. Saying the same thing over and over like it's a fact does not make it a fact. The huge uptake of Netflix alone (iinet were crediting Netflix for 15% of their total bandwidth a week after Netflix Australia launched) is proof in itself that people will pay for content when it is a) affordable and b) easily accessible. It is a proven strategy that you continue to wilfully ignore. https://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130723/12235723906/two-new-reports-confirm-best-way-to-reduce-piracy-dramatically-is-to-offer-good-legal-alternatives.shtml I don't suppose that would have anything to do with the anti piracy laws introduced in 2009 would it?:-k http://www.ibtimes.com/sweden-internet-traffic-drops-around-40-wake-anti-piracy-law-244997
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Netflix Australia seems to have better movies than US. Canada is best for content.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:Thanks. netflix is cheap but its rubbish. I'm only really into movies rather than TV shows. Give Stan a go. Free month trial and it's actually cheaper than Netflix for HD. Haven't tried Presto but it's not HD so not interested. The thing I like about Netflix is that when I use it with a VPN I can access more content. The library here is still a bit limited.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Thanks. netflix is cheap but its rubbish. I'm only really into movies rather than TV shows.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:Anyone recommend a VOD website with the best new release movie library?
Searching netflix and they have fuck all. http://www.finder.com.au/movies-internet-tvThere's also this one: https://www.justwatch.com/auEdited by mcjules: 9/4/2015 10:22:26 AM
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:Anyone recommend a VOD website with the best new release movie library?
Searching netflix and they have fuck all. Google Play is technically VOD
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
roary's mane wrote:notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:
I just had a look at my local cinemas website, if I took my wife and kid to see FnF tomorrow in the middle of the day it would cost me just under $60 before going anywhere near the confection stand.
Rusty's strawman (as usual) example does nothing to dispel an already proven strategy to minimise media copyright infringement.
Edited by notorganic: 9/4/2015 12:10:37 AM
Sure it might somewhat reduce illegal downloads, but despite content being made cheap and accessible (i.e. Netflix) illegal download will continue to occur in large volumes. Your argument that cheap accessible content will bring an end to the piracy industry is plain wrong. Saying the same thing over and over like it's a fact does not make it a fact. The huge uptake of Netflix alone (iinet were crediting Netflix for 15% of their total bandwidth a week after Netflix Australia launched) is proof in itself that people will pay for content when it is a) affordable and b) easily accessible. It is a proven strategy that you continue to wilfully ignore. https://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130723/12235723906/two-new-reports-confirm-best-way-to-reduce-piracy-dramatically-is-to-offer-good-legal-alternatives.shtml A lot of people purchased Netflix without really understanding how shit it is. I lived in the UK a few years ago, and we had Netflix. The content is huge, and you'll never run out of things to watch, but that doesn't necessarily make it any good. OITNB and HoC are really the only "top shelf" programming they gave. I know a few people, who I admit are dim (mostly due to being 'older') who thought it would give them access to any TV show, because thats how its portrayed in the media. I agree that we are simply going to see an upturn in the use of VPNs now. IPVanish even just put an 'Australia Sale' on, cheeky bastards. Calling it shit is a huge overstatement.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Anyone recommend a VOD website with the best new release movie library?
Searching netflix and they have fuck all.
|
|
|
roarys mane
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:
I just had a look at my local cinemas website, if I took my wife and kid to see FnF tomorrow in the middle of the day it would cost me just under $60 before going anywhere near the confection stand.
Rusty's strawman (as usual) example does nothing to dispel an already proven strategy to minimise media copyright infringement.
Edited by notorganic: 9/4/2015 12:10:37 AM
Sure it might somewhat reduce illegal downloads, but despite content being made cheap and accessible (i.e. Netflix) illegal download will continue to occur in large volumes. Your argument that cheap accessible content will bring an end to the piracy industry is plain wrong. Saying the same thing over and over like it's a fact does not make it a fact. The huge uptake of Netflix alone (iinet were crediting Netflix for 15% of their total bandwidth a week after Netflix Australia launched) is proof in itself that people will pay for content when it is a) affordable and b) easily accessible. It is a proven strategy that you continue to wilfully ignore. https://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130723/12235723906/two-new-reports-confirm-best-way-to-reduce-piracy-dramatically-is-to-offer-good-legal-alternatives.shtml A lot of people purchased Netflix without really understanding how shit it is. I lived in the UK a few years ago, and we had Netflix. The content is huge, and you'll never run out of things to watch, but that doesn't necessarily make it any good. OITNB and HoC are really the only "top shelf" programming they gave. I know a few people, who I admit are dim (mostly due to being 'older') who thought it would give them access to any TV show, because thats how its portrayed in the media. I agree that we are simply going to see an upturn in the use of VPNs now. IPVanish even just put an 'Australia Sale' on, cheeky bastards.
|
|
|
WaMackie
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Definitely related to meta data laws
One of the main reasons they were introduced. Terrorism was just to get you to agree to them.
...And if you think this is a Liberal or Labor thing then think again...
You're both guilty of this breach of civil liberty muppets Brilliant post.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:
I just had a look at my local cinemas website, if I took my wife and kid to see FnF tomorrow in the middle of the day it would cost me just under $60 before going anywhere near the confection stand.
Rusty's strawman (as usual) example does nothing to dispel an already proven strategy to minimise media copyright infringement.
Edited by notorganic: 9/4/2015 12:10:37 AM
Sure it might somewhat reduce illegal downloads, but despite content being made cheap and accessible (i.e. Netflix) illegal download will continue to occur in large volumes. Your argument that cheap accessible content will bring an end to the piracy industry is plain wrong. Saying the same thing over and over like it's a fact does not make it a fact. The huge uptake of Netflix alone (iinet were crediting Netflix for 15% of their total bandwidth a week after Netflix Australia launched) is proof in itself that people will pay for content when it is a) affordable and b) easily accessible. It is a proven strategy that you continue to wilfully ignore. https://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130723/12235723906/two-new-reports-confirm-best-way-to-reduce-piracy-dramatically-is-to-offer-good-legal-alternatives.shtml
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:
I just had a look at my local cinemas website, if I took my wife and kid to see FnF tomorrow in the middle of the day it would cost me just under $60 before going anywhere near the confection stand.
Rusty's strawman (as usual) example does nothing to dispel an already proven strategy to minimise media copyright infringement.
Edited by notorganic: 9/4/2015 12:10:37 AM
Sure it might somewhat reduce illegal downloads, but despite content being made cheap and accessible (i.e. Netflix) illegal download will continue to occur in large volumes. Your argument that cheap accessible content will bring an end to the piracy industry is plain wrong.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
macktheknife wrote:Quote:This dispels notors dud theory that content that is cheap and accessible (ie Netflix) will defeat internet piracy. Cheap at a cinema in Australia? lol. Exactly. People aren't going to merrily wait six months for their favourite movie to come to Netflix.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Griffindinho wrote:rusty wrote:Fast and furious 7 (which is by the way a terrible movie) has so far been illegally downloaded over 2.59 million times, despite only being in the cinemas for a few days. This dispels notors dud theory that content that is cheap and accessible (ie Netflix) will defeat internet piracy. Of course people don't really believe such nonsense these are just the silly things people think up to rationalise their illegal downloading and externalise blame onto content providers. Yeah, nah. I would rather wait for the blu ray release than watch a low bit rate cam source. So would I, but there are so far 2.59 million folks who disagree with us. Keep in mind this figure will only explode, when better quality version are made available for download.
|
|
|