CHEP
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 227,
Visits: 0
|
By the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go.
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xLicense will be given to another group after next season. Their stadium or whatever plans wont happen. Give License to Wollongong My guess is they are trying to get funds to pay for this stadium. Or whatever development is meant to start. if they are looking to build a proper stadium for professional sports I’d estimate you need minimum $100M.
So there may be some wheeling and dealing going on behind the scenes trying to find some silly investors to pump in the cash? For some ROi from the future property development.
In the current environment is anyone stupid enough to part with this kind of money? Does anyone currently involved with the clu. Have the money to build something g like this?? I’m not sure. It was supposed to start when they got the licence . Yes covid has put a break on things but having having offices for lease for about 2 years and having their merch shop leased out doesn't bode well The land can be shovel ready as much as they like. But Won’t start with no funds. I don’t think anyone in the aleague has the willingness to part with funds to build an asset like a stadium.
The club would most likely be looking for a “partner” to build the stadium. I think is the biggest stumbling block
Their biggest backers of Chinese backers have quietly backed away. They're looking for a commercial builder to help them build it . As I think their original sponsor who was a commercial builder has backed away as well
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
If only the ffa went with team 11's bid.
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xWhat a debacle. Degraded the whole A League. Yeah I love the a league but I can’t defend them. we really need to get rid of them before next season They are not my team, i'm with Syd Oly but if they start digging in a couple of months will all this get retracted becsuse of non patience? What about buying a 1 year membership as a truce? Wait, I'll remind everyone then. As I mentioned to someone else on this thread ages ago. Ill buy the beers at their first game at the Tarneit Stadium.... Provided it is built by 2028 ... that's 10 years from when they where granted the license.... fair enough? Ok maik! But I won't wear their WU jersey, not my team.
|
|
|
crimsoncrusoe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)  Love that race track😀
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)  Everyone is constantly harping on about the need for boutique stadiums, and this sensational boutique stadium, only a few kms outside of the CBD was there for the taking. A spot where Melburnians would happily to go to for watching football.
|
|
|
Mustang67
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 954,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)  Everyone is constantly harping on about the need for boutique stadiums, and this sensational boutique stadium, only a few kms outside of the CBD was there for the taking. A spot where Melburnians would happily to go to for watching football. The stadium wasn't the problem with that bid
|
|
|
charlied
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)  Sorry, but that running track trashes the whole thing
|
|
|
charlied
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xLicense will be given to another group after next season. Their stadium or whatever plans wont happen. Give License to Wollongong This is my take too. The club won't exist in two years.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIf only the ffa went with team 11's bid. And now City is kind sorta southwest based while playing all games at AAMI Park and having a logo based on the City of Melbourne coat of arms, and Team 11 is gone forever.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)  Love that race track😀 https://www.stadiumguide.com/tournaments/uefa-euro-2020/Guess you are gonna hate watching the Euros this year?
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xWhat a debacle. Degraded the whole A League. Yeah I love the a league but I can’t defend them. we really need to get rid of them before next season They are not my team, i'm with Syd Oly but if they start digging in a couple of months will all this get retracted becsuse of non patience? What about buying a 1 year membership as a truce? Wait, I'll remind everyone then. As I mentioned to someone else on this thread ages ago. Ill buy the beers at their first game at the Tarneit Stadium.... Provided it is built by 2028 ... that's 10 years from when they where granted the license.... fair enough? Ok maik! But I won't wear their WU jersey, not my team. Don't worry maik, I have a feeling you won't even have to come down to Melbourne.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)  Everyone is constantly harping on about the need for boutique stadiums, and this sensational boutique stadium, only a few kms outside of the CBD was there for the taking. A spot where Melburnians would happily to go to for watching football. The stadium wasn't the problem with that bid Let me guess.... "Do you know who I am?"
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)  Sorry, but that running track trashes the whole thing No the soccer gets played on the green stuff.... keep up Charles. Lol
|
|
|
df1982
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 861,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)  Sorry, but that running track trashes the whole thing No the soccer gets played on the green stuff.... keep up Charles. Lol The previous iteration of Lakeside WAS a perfect boutique ground, it was just the right capacity and fans breathed down the neck of the players. In the new one you're a million miles from the action. Just because some grounds do it in Europe doesn't mean it's good (and many teams are moving away from athletics tracks, e.g. Bayern, Juve, in the future maybe Roma, Hertha Berlin, etc.). You can blame Eddie McGuire for that though and the government caving into Collingwood's demand for a training ground next to the MCG.
|
|
|
southmelb
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)  Sorry, but that running track trashes the whole thing No the soccer gets played on the green stuff.... keep up Charles. Lol The previous iteration of Lakeside WAS a perfect boutique ground, it was just the right capacity and fans breathed down the neck of the players. In the new one you're a million miles from the action. Just because some grounds do it in Europe doesn't mean it's good (and many teams are moving away from athletics tracks, e.g. Bayern, Juve, in the future maybe Roma, Hertha Berlin, etc.). You can blame Eddie McGuire for that though and the government caving into Collingwood's demand for a training ground next to the MCG. It was a missed opportunity for the game, had South been awarded the 2nd license no athletics track would have been put around lakeside, we would have had 2 quality stadiums. Once South was overlooked the club had to look to secure its future and the club was basically faced with either being co tenants with athletics or be booted out of the precinct all together, obviously the club chose the former. They were never going to allow a venue like that just be used for npl.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)  Sorry, but that running track trashes the whole thing No the soccer gets played on the green stuff.... keep up Charles. Lol The previous iteration of Lakeside WAS a perfect boutique ground, it was just the right capacity and fans breathed down the neck of the players. In the new one you're a million miles from the action. Just because some grounds do it in Europe doesn't mean it's good (and many teams are moving away from athletics tracks, e.g. Bayern, Juve, in the future maybe Roma, Hertha Berlin, etc.). You can blame Eddie McGuire for that though and the government caving into Collingwood's demand for a training ground next to the MCG. I don't disagree with you, I hate the running track too but to be perfectly honest the viewing is better than most other stadiums at NPL level, baring maybe Somer's Street. Point being that compared to Tarneit Stadium it is 10000000000000% better wouldn't you think?
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
As the old saying goes, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)  Sorry, but that running track trashes the whole thing No the soccer gets played on the green stuff.... keep up Charles. Lol The previous iteration of Lakeside WAS a perfect boutique ground, it was just the right capacity and fans breathed down the neck of the players. In the new one you're a million miles from the action. Just because some grounds do it in Europe doesn't mean it's good (and many teams are moving away from athletics tracks, e.g. Bayern, Juve, in the future maybe Roma, Hertha Berlin, etc.). You can blame Eddie McGuire for that though and the government caving into Collingwood's demand for a training ground next to the MCG. I don't disagree with you, I hate the running track too but to be perfectly honest the viewing is better than most other stadiums at NPL level, baring maybe Somer's Street. Point being that compared to Tarneit Stadium it is 10000000000000% better wouldn't you think? You're fighting a battle you can't win. The powers that be want "inclusive clubs" with a "broad appeal". In other words, no wog clubs. Real or perceived.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xBy the end of the expansion submissions, almost every bid had some BS claim about a stadium because it became the thing to do. Some were that ridiculous that they didn’t even bother to provide a concept image. It was an absolute loss take. The FFA at the time were dumb enough to believe it and fell for WU’s claims hook, line and sinker. The lesson to be learnt here is that any claims of a stadium cannot be factored into future expansion decisions unless it’s either in the process of being built or ready to go. Some bids even went as far as actually having real stadiums ready to go :)  Sorry, but that running track trashes the whole thing No the soccer gets played on the green stuff.... keep up Charles. Lol The previous iteration of Lakeside WAS a perfect boutique ground, it was just the right capacity and fans breathed down the neck of the players. In the new one you're a million miles from the action. Just because some grounds do it in Europe doesn't mean it's good (and many teams are moving away from athletics tracks, e.g. Bayern, Juve, in the future maybe Roma, Hertha Berlin, etc.). You can blame Eddie McGuire for that though and the government caving into Collingwood's demand for a training ground next to the MCG. I don't disagree with you, I hate the running track too but to be perfectly honest the viewing is better than most other stadiums at NPL level, baring maybe Somer's Street. Point being that compared to Tarneit Stadium it is 10000000000000% better wouldn't you think? You're fighting a battle you can't win. The powers that be want "inclusive clubs" with a "broad appeal". In other words, no wog clubs. Real or perceived. Hahahah no shit mate. I know just love bashing these real, estate turds and their inclusion. Don't know what I will do with myself in a couple of years time when they fold?
|
|
|
mlar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 54,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xIf only the ffa went with team 11's bid. And now City is kind sorta southwest based while playing all games at AAMI Park and having a logo based on the City of Melbourne coat of arms, and Team 11 is gone forever. And what's your point? Some European teams do the exact same. Roma, a team representing the city of Rome, has the city's symbol and plays their games in the city, but their headquarters and where they train is outside of the city. So, what's your issue? Victory might have to do the exact same thing if they ever decide to get their own headquarters/base, since land in inner Melbourne is extremely hard to come by.
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Some guy on ALeague hub mentioned WU could use Lakeside for home games next few seasons. If that happened, is the stadium up to scratch? Can't amalgamate cause the colours are different.
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSome guy on ALeague hub mentioned WU could use Lakeside for home games next few seasons If that happened, is the stadium up to scratch? haha ha I cant see any other Team having a problem with that
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xSome guy on ALeague hub mentioned WU could use Lakeside for home games next few seasons If that happened, is the stadium up to scratch? haha ha I cant see any other Team having a problem with that Just a tenancy, if it came about I'd say.
|
|
|
SEroos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 111,
Visits: 0
|
+xSome guy on ALeague hub mentioned WU could use Lakeside for home games next few seasons. If that happened, is the stadium up to scratch? Can't amalgamate cause the colours are different. A team meaning to represent the West playing in Albert Park is ridiculous. They need to make an arrangement with the Knights and play games there. Even Green Gully or Whitten Oval in Footscray would be a better option.
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xSome guy on ALeague hub mentioned WU could use Lakeside for home games next few seasons If that happened, is the stadium up to scratch? haha ha I cant see any other Team having a problem with that Just a tenancy, if it came about I'd say. I doubt we are thinking of the same teams
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSome guy on ALeague hub mentioned WU could use Lakeside for home games next few seasons If that happened, is the stadium up to scratch? If South Melbourne have a say in it, can't imagine they'd let it happen without extracting long due compensation.
|
|
|
Heart_fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K,
Visits: 0
|
If they are seriously thinking of playing their matches at Albert Park, they might as well pack up and concede defeat now. I thought the stadium was meant to be open by the 2023 Women’s World Cup, so playing at another stadium for a few seasons is a strange course of events of true.
I have been quite patient overall about WU, but it’s getting beyond a joke. Seems like smoke and mirrors at every turn.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIf only the ffa went with team 11's bid. And now City is kind sorta southwest based while playing all games at AAMI Park and having a logo based on the City of Melbourne coat of arms, and Team 11 is gone forever. And what's your point? Some European teams do the exact same. Roma, a team representing the city of Rome, has the city's symbol and plays their games in the city, but their headquarters and where they train is outside of the city. So, what's your issue? Victory might have to do the exact same thing if they ever decide to get their own headquarters/base, since land in inner Melbourne is extremely hard to come by. My point is that the official Team11 bid was still advocating for a dedicated South East team after WU's bid won instead but folded when City moved down there and they became "Team City", and that's a shame. https://twitter.com/TeamCitySE
|
|
|