mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:Oh no, Libs going to crack down on welfare cheats! How dare they preserve the integrity of the safety net by going after rorters! I expected better than this :lol: Even if you believe rorters are an issue that needs attention, my criticism was the pulled out of their arse figures they're using to balance the books.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:Oh no, Libs going to crack down on welfare cheats! How dare they preserve the integrity of the safety net by going after rorters! I expected better than this :lol: Even if you believe rorters are an issue that needs attention, my criticism was the pulled out of their arse figures they're using to balance the books. Every billion here and there counts towards budget repair.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:Oh no, Libs going to crack down on welfare cheats! How dare they preserve the integrity of the safety net by going after rorters! I expected better than this :lol: Even if you believe rorters are an issue that needs attention, my criticism was the pulled out of their arse figures they're using to balance the books. Every billion here and there counts towards budget repair. Cool so you have nothing :lol:
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:Oh no, Libs going to crack down on welfare cheats! How dare they preserve the integrity of the safety net by going after rorters! I expected better than this :lol: Even if you believe rorters are an issue that needs attention, my criticism was the pulled out of their arse figures they're using to balance the books. Every billion here and there counts towards budget repair. Wow cool rhyme. Could even turn that into a jingle or a slogan. Jobs and growth! -PB
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Wow, people weeping about government cracking down on welfare cheating
Sorta rhymed
|
|
|
scotty21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Went down to my early voting centre today. No lines no bullshit \:d/ No sausage sizzle though [-x
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Scomo's plan is a great money saver.
First you defund the operation of the welfare system to the extent that it's near impossible to communicate with, then pump money into recoveries to take money from people who gave up on spending 3 hours in a centrelink phone queue to report their changed circumstances.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:First you defund the operation of the welfare system to the extent that it's near impossible to communicate with, then pump money into recoveries to take money from people who gave up on spending 3 hours in a centrelink phone queue to report their changed circumstances. Brilliant. Centrelink operator : "sir you failed to inform us you started full time work in 1993 and you've been claiming Newstart this whole time" Welfare cheat : "yeah but every time I ring up on da fuggin phone it's a bloody three hour wait so it's your fault"
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:First you defund the operation of the welfare system to the extent that it's near impossible to communicate with, then pump money into recoveries to take money from people who gave up on spending 3 hours in a centrelink phone queue to report their changed circumstances. Brilliant. Centrelink operator : "sir you failed to inform us you started full time work in 1993 and you've been claiming Newstart this whole time" Welfare cheat : "yeah but every time I ring up on da fuggin phone it's a bloody three hour wait so it's your fault" With the constant stream of bizarre strawman arguments like this one, it's always difficult to tell if your ignorance is wilful or just incidental. KUTGW.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:Oh no, Libs going to crack down on welfare cheats! How dare they preserve the integrity of the safety net by going after rorters! I expected better than this :lol: Even if you believe rorters are an issue that needs attention, my criticism was the pulled out of their arse figures they're using to balance the books. Every billion here and there counts towards budget repair. There are so many people who don't exist collecting welfare payments and thrall safe the only ones capable of tackling this issue.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:Wow, people weeping about government cracking down on welfare cheating
Sorta rhymed Amazing! I guess Labor doesn't want to hit its welfare cheating base! :lol:
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:First you defund the operation of the welfare system to the extent that it's near impossible to communicate with, then pump money into recoveries to take money from people who gave up on spending 3 hours in a centrelink phone queue to report their changed circumstances. Brilliant. Centrelink operator : "sir you failed to inform us you started full time work in 1993 and you've been claiming Newstart this whole time" Welfare cheat : "yeah but every time I ring up on da fuggin phone it's a bloody three hour wait so it's your fault" With the constant stream of bizarre strawman arguments like this one, it's always difficult to tell if your ignorance is wilful or just incidental. KUTGW. Are you denying that there are thousands of welfare cheats in Australia and that they are likely to be Shorten voters?
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Aikhme wrote:notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:First you defund the operation of the welfare system to the extent that it's near impossible to communicate with, then pump money into recoveries to take money from people who gave up on spending 3 hours in a centrelink phone queue to report their changed circumstances. Brilliant. Centrelink operator : "sir you failed to inform us you started full time work in 1993 and you've been claiming Newstart this whole time" Welfare cheat : "yeah but every time I ring up on da fuggin phone it's a bloody three hour wait so it's your fault" With the constant stream of bizarre strawman arguments like this one, it's always difficult to tell if your ignorance is wilful or just incidental. KUTGW. Are you denying that there are thousands of welfare cheats in Australia and that they are likely to be Shorten voters? Is there a term for a strawman multiplied by strawman? -PB
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Aikhme wrote:notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:First you defund the operation of the welfare system to the extent that it's near impossible to communicate with, then pump money into recoveries to take money from people who gave up on spending 3 hours in a centrelink phone queue to report their changed circumstances. Brilliant. Centrelink operator : "sir you failed to inform us you started full time work in 1993 and you've been claiming Newstart this whole time" Welfare cheat : "yeah but every time I ring up on da fuggin phone it's a bloody three hour wait so it's your fault" With the constant stream of bizarre strawman arguments like this one, it's always difficult to tell if your ignorance is wilful or just incidental. KUTGW. Are you denying that there are thousands of welfare cheats in Australia and that they are likely to be Shorten voters? Is there a term for a strawman multiplied by strawman? -PB In debating terms they would call it the "gish gallop". In these terms it's just cu ntception
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:First you defund the operation of the welfare system to the extent that it's near impossible to communicate with, then pump money into recoveries to take money from people who gave up on spending 3 hours in a centrelink phone queue to report their changed circumstances. Brilliant. Centrelink operator : "sir you failed to inform us you started full time work in 1993 and you've been claiming Newstart this whole time" Welfare cheat : "yeah but every time I ring up on da fuggin phone it's a bloody three hour wait so it's your fault" With the constant stream of bizarre strawman arguments like this one, it's always difficult to tell if your ignorance is wilful or just incidental.. The irony is delicious
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Aikhme wrote:notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:First you defund the operation of the welfare system to the extent that it's near impossible to communicate with, then pump money into recoveries to take money from people who gave up on spending 3 hours in a centrelink phone queue to report their changed circumstances. Brilliant. Centrelink operator : "sir you failed to inform us you started full time work in 1993 and you've been claiming Newstart this whole time" Welfare cheat : "yeah but every time I ring up on da fuggin phone it's a bloody three hour wait so it's your fault" With the constant stream of bizarre strawman arguments like this one, it's always difficult to tell if your ignorance is wilful or just incidental. KUTGW. Are you denying that there are thousands of welfare cheats in Australia and that they are likely to be Shorten voters? Is there a term for a strawman multiplied by strawman? -PB Is straw man on welfare too, collecting his 12 benefits for 12 illegitimate kiddies to 12 mothers?
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
After getting frustrated with being handed a senate paper that is twice as wide as the booth I was expected to place it in to vote and having somewhere to be, today I voted above the line for the first time since I've been a voter.
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Time to vote sex party. Robbie swan is a cool cat
Edited by Socawho: 29/6/2016 08:41:19 PM
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:Time to vote sex party. Robbie swan is a cool cat Good lad.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
That Leyonhjelm skit on the Chaser was brilliant =d>
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:That Leyonhjelm skit on the Chaser was brilliant =d> To be fair to him, he didn't try and censor them - he just told them to fuck off.
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
I did early voting yesterday.
I purposely informal voted the green slip (for any Community fans out there, I voted for South Park), and I did 1-6 above the line on the Senate sheet (Pirate Party, Science Party, PUP, Derryn Hinch, and I can't remember the other 2 but they seemed pretty insignificant). Mrs v4 accidentally informal voted the Senate & echoed the views of many I've heard that 1-6 above the line is silly, confusing for those not heavily interested in politics & not worth the hassle.
Edited by pv4: 30/6/2016 07:33:26 AM
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
pv4 wrote:I did early voting yesterday.
I purposely informal voted the green slip (for any Community fans out there, I voted for South Park), and I did 1-6 above the line on the Senate sheet (Pirate Party, Science Party, PUP, Derryn Hinch, and I can't remember the other 2 but they seemed pretty insignificant). Mrs v4 accidentally informal voted the Senate & echoed the views of many I've heard that 1-6 above the line is silly, confusing for those not heavily interested in politics & not worth the hassle.
Edited by pv4: 30/6/2016 07:33:26 AM Which is exactly what the major parties wanted when they pushed through the legislation for voting changes. -PB
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Seems like the polls point to a relatively comfortable Lib victory - reduced majority, but unlikely to be a hung parliament.
Senate looks to be the most interesting, given the quotas have halved, and the new voting system.
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
pv4 wrote:I did early voting yesterday.
I purposely informal voted the green slip (for any Community fans out there, I voted for South Park), and I did 1-6 above the line on the Senate sheet (Pirate Party, Science Party, PUP, Derryn Hinch, and I can't remember the other 2 but they seemed pretty insignificant). Mrs v4 accidentally informal voted the Senate & echoed the views of many I've heard that 1-6 above the line is silly, confusing for those not heavily interested in politics & not worth the hassle.
Edited by pv4: 30/6/2016 07:33:26 AM Out of interest, how did Mrs v4 vote informally in the Senate? Did she just do a 1 above the line? Because if so, that vote will still be counted. The "6 above the line" is a suggestion, not a requirement to be formal. Its just that the vote will be exhausted immediately.
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:pv4 wrote:I did early voting yesterday.
I purposely informal voted the green slip (for any Community fans out there, I voted for South Park), and I did 1-6 above the line on the Senate sheet (Pirate Party, Science Party, PUP, Derryn Hinch, and I can't remember the other 2 but they seemed pretty insignificant). Mrs v4 accidentally informal voted the Senate & echoed the views of many I've heard that 1-6 above the line is silly, confusing for those not heavily interested in politics & not worth the hassle.
Edited by pv4: 30/6/2016 07:33:26 AM Out of interest, how did Mrs v4 vote informally in the Senate? Did she just do a 1 above the line? Because if so, that vote will still be counted. The "6 above the line" is a suggestion, not a requirement to be formal. Its just that the vote will be exhausted immediately. I think she just got confused and flustered with all the parties and ended up just giving up. I think she scribbled all over it in the end. She wasn't super chatty about it tbh, but yeah she informalled for sure.
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:Seems like the polls point to a relatively comfortable Lib victory - reduced majority, but unlikely to be a hung parliament.
Senate looks to be the most interesting, given the quotas have halved, and the new voting system. Was it notorganic that told us to bet large money on a hung parliament, a few months back? Using solely my recollection here.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
labour need a systematic error in the polls of about 2% which is about a 1 in 6 shot there is also a 1 in 6 shot for a landslide coalition victory with a systematic error in the polls going the other way
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
pv4 wrote:AzzaMarch wrote:Seems like the polls point to a relatively comfortable Lib victory - reduced majority, but unlikely to be a hung parliament.
Senate looks to be the most interesting, given the quotas have halved, and the new voting system. Was it notorganic that told us to bet large money on a hung parliament, a few months back? Using solely my recollection here. Twas. I still reckon it's a goer.
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:pv4 wrote:AzzaMarch wrote:Seems like the polls point to a relatively comfortable Lib victory - reduced majority, but unlikely to be a hung parliament.
Senate looks to be the most interesting, given the quotas have halved, and the new voting system. Was it notorganic that told us to bet large money on a hung parliament, a few months back? Using solely my recollection here. Twas. I still reckon it's a goer. If anyone has kept up with my betting history, if I bet on it to happen it most certainly will not happen :lol:
|
|
|