adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
lukerobinho wrote:Kruse injured for another month fuck
|
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
Can do nothing but laugh. What a joke.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Langan wrote: Viduka was world class and he developed nearly all of his game in Australia.
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:08 PM
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:25 PM
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:38 PM
Skill-wise he was world class. Overall, he was lacking a bit. He had sheer and utter brilliance, but he went missing for games. His teammates have complained that he didn't exactly always turn up. But in any event look at the clubs he played for. He was a part of a fantastic Leeds outfit, but that's about it. He wasn't world class in terms of success achieved at club level (notwithstanding four goals in one game against Liverpool). He didn't scale the heights of Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Ajax, PSG, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Juventus, AC Milan, etc. Overall, I don't consider him world class. Yes he developed almost entirely in Australia. I still regard him as the exception. It's very for a player to have a hope of becoming world class while developing almost entirely in Australia. Certainly, Viduka arrived in the Premier League relatively late. Perhaps if he arrived earlier, he'd have had a hope of being world class in all aspects of his game? Although perhaps not because his issues may have been temperamental.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
TheSelectFew wrote:Can do nothing but laugh. What a joke. Unlucky for Stuttgart, that's for sure. Kruse and Langerak out injured.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Higashi wrote:quickflick wrote:Barca4Life
Comparing Antonis and Arzani is not intended on the basis of comparing skillsets. It's important to compare what happens when players stay in the A-League to develop compared to when they go to Europe young (not that Arzani is in Europe yet).
In this respect, it wouldn't matter if we were comparing a central defender and a striker. The type of player they are is irrelevant, it's just about how they develop in their respective pathways. Record of HAL developed AUS players compared to overseas youth developed AUS players currently playing at the highest level doesn't support your argument. Although Arzani and Maskin's generation is touted as one of the most gifted in many years, so I do think they have a better chance of succeeding overseas at a young age than others no matter which development route they take. Edited by Higashi: 16/9/2015 11:02:06 PM Gotta look further back than the A-League. In any event, to date the A-League has not done a stellar job at producing great footballers (but it is a build process). The most accomplished A-League product is Mile Jedinak. Possibly the four greatest footballers to have possessed an Australian passport all went overseas at a young age. Harry Kewell, Tim Cahill, Craig Johnson and Christian Vieri. Plus, your sample space is too small, imo. As I've said ad nauseam, there are no physiological or anatomical differences between Australian players and those from other countries. They're all human beings. Let's look at the sample space of footballers who developed in Australia versus footballers (of any nationality) who developed in Europe. Not many, if any, of the Australian-developed ones became/are world-class. Look at the numbers of European-developed ones who became/are world class. That gives you the true reflection. I agree that this generation of younger players is supposed to be better than previous ones. Hopefully, at this point, they're in line with the rest of the best developed players in the world. After 16 or so, Australia can't offer them much. So that's when they need to be in Europe. I think a lot hinges on which club/academy in Europe they go to. Some have great track record for developing talent, others don't. That's a nuance many seem to miss. Edited by quickflick: 16/9/2015 11:41:52 PM
|
|
|
Voice ofReason
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
quickflick wrote:Langan wrote: Viduka was world class and he developed nearly all of his game in Australia.
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:08 PM
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:25 PM
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:38 PM
Skill-wise he was world class. Overall, he was lacking a bit. He had sheer and utter brilliance, but he went missing for games. His teammates have complained that he didn't exactly always turn up. But in any event look at the clubs he played for. He was a part of a fantastic Leeds outfit, but that's about it. He wasn't world class in terms of success achieved at club level (notwithstanding four goals in one game against Liverpool). He didn't scale the heights of Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Ajax, PSG, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Juventus, AC Milan, etc. Overall, I don't consider him world class. Yes he developed almost entirely in Australia. I still regard him as the exception. It's very for a player to have a hope of becoming world class while developing almost entirely in Australia. Certainly, Viduka arrived in the Premier League relatively late. Perhaps if he arrived earlier, he'd have had a hope of being world class in all aspects of his game? Although perhaps not because his issues may have been temperamental. Viduka's teammate Paul Robinson had Viduka as the striker in the Best XI he had ever played with and that includes international teammates. Now he did say he wasn't the best trainer but he always turned up on match day. Stewart Downing named him as the best footballer he's ever played with and that was while Downing was at Liverpool. The clubs you mentioned Man Utd, Barca, Real Madrid, AC Milan and add Inter Milan all at one time made moves for Viduka. The Spanish and Italian clubs had their bids rejected by Leeds the same way the rejected the bids for Kewell. Viduka was if the reports are correct valued at around 20 to 25 million pounds while at Leeds. Sure he may not have been world class throughout his career especially when injuries caught up with him but there's no doubt he was World Class.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Voice ofReason wrote:quickflick wrote:Langan wrote: Viduka was world class and he developed nearly all of his game in Australia.
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:08 PM
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:25 PM
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:38 PM
Skill-wise he was world class. Overall, he was lacking a bit. He had sheer and utter brilliance, but he went missing for games. His teammates have complained that he didn't exactly always turn up. But in any event look at the clubs he played for. He was a part of a fantastic Leeds outfit, but that's about it. He wasn't world class in terms of success achieved at club level (notwithstanding four goals in one game against Liverpool). He didn't scale the heights of Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Ajax, PSG, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Juventus, AC Milan, etc. Overall, I don't consider him world class. Yes he developed almost entirely in Australia. I still regard him as the exception. It's very for a player to have a hope of becoming world class while developing almost entirely in Australia. Certainly, Viduka arrived in the Premier League relatively late. Perhaps if he arrived earlier, he'd have had a hope of being world class in all aspects of his game? Although perhaps not because his issues may have been temperamental. Viduka's teammate Paul Robinson had Viduka as the striker in the Best XI he had ever played with and that includes international teammates. Now he did say he wasn't the best trainer but he always turned up on match day. Stewart Downing named him as the best footballer he's ever played with and that was while Downing was at Liverpool. The clubs you mentioned Man Utd, Barca, Real Madrid, AC Milan and add Inter Milan all at one time made moves for Viduka. The Spanish and Italian clubs had their bids rejected by Leeds the same way the rejected the bids for Kewell. Viduka was if the reports are correct valued at around 20 to 25 million pounds while at Leeds. Sure he may not have been world class throughout his career especially when injuries caught up with him but there's no doubt he was World Class. Fair play. I maintain, skill-wise he was world class. And yep he did most of his development in Aus. But I don't think that, in all aspects of his game, he was world-class. Injuries and club manoeuvring undoubtedly played their part. I also think his mentality may have been the biggest obstacle in his career (and that surely has little to do with developing in Australia, as that's something where Australian football/sport is traditionally strong). He's the type of player whose abilities will be remembered by those who played with/against him, but history won't in quite the same way. To go down in history as world class, mere ability is not enough. Edited by quickflick: 16/9/2015 11:50:31 PM
|
|
|
Voice ofReason
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
quickflick wrote:Voice ofReason wrote:quickflick wrote:Langan wrote: Viduka was world class and he developed nearly all of his game in Australia.
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:08 PM
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:25 PM
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:38 PM
Skill-wise he was world class. Overall, he was lacking a bit. He had sheer and utter brilliance, but he went missing for games. His teammates have complained that he didn't exactly always turn up. But in any event look at the clubs he played for. He was a part of a fantastic Leeds outfit, but that's about it. He wasn't world class in terms of success achieved at club level (notwithstanding four goals in one game against Liverpool). He didn't scale the heights of Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Ajax, PSG, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Juventus, AC Milan, etc. Overall, I don't consider him world class. Yes he developed almost entirely in Australia. I still regard him as the exception. It's very for a player to have a hope of becoming world class while developing almost entirely in Australia. Certainly, Viduka arrived in the Premier League relatively late. Perhaps if he arrived earlier, he'd have had a hope of being world class in all aspects of his game? Although perhaps not because his issues may have been temperamental. Viduka's teammate Paul Robinson had Viduka as the striker in the Best XI he had ever played with and that includes international teammates. Now he did say he wasn't the best trainer but he always turned up on match day. Stewart Downing named him as the best footballer he's ever played with and that was while Downing was at Liverpool. The clubs you mentioned Man Utd, Barca, Real Madrid, AC Milan and add Inter Milan all at one time made moves for Viduka. The Spanish and Italian clubs had their bids rejected by Leeds the same way the rejected the bids for Kewell. Viduka was if the reports are correct valued at around 20 to 25 million pounds while at Leeds. Sure he may not have been world class throughout his career especially when injuries caught up with him but there's no doubt he was World Class. Fair play. I maintain, skill-wise he was world class. And yep he did most of his development in Aus. But I don't think that, in all aspects of his game, he was world-class. Injuries and club manoeuvring undoubtedly played their part. I also think his mentality may have been the biggest obstacle in his career (and that surely has little to do with developing in Australia, as that's something where Australian football/sport is traditionally strong). He's the type of player whom those who played with/against him will remember his abilities, but history won't in quite the same way. To go down in history as world class, mere ability is not enough. That's not on him though and it doesn't detract from the fact his teammates and opponents rate him as world class. For me us fans don't decide that because we have little to draw on as comparison. If all those he played against or with and the biggest clubs in the world wanted him then that's enough for me to say ok perhaps he was world class. Perhaps he and Harry are the only two we can say in their day they were considered amongst the best in their position (maybe Bozza too).
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Voice ofReason wrote:quickflick wrote:Voice ofReason wrote:quickflick wrote:Langan wrote: Viduka was world class and he developed nearly all of his game in Australia.
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:08 PM
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:25 PM
Edited by Langan: 16/9/2015 11:17:38 PM
Skill-wise he was world class. Overall, he was lacking a bit. He had sheer and utter brilliance, but he went missing for games. His teammates have complained that he didn't exactly always turn up. But in any event look at the clubs he played for. He was a part of a fantastic Leeds outfit, but that's about it. He wasn't world class in terms of success achieved at club level (notwithstanding four goals in one game against Liverpool). He didn't scale the heights of Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Ajax, PSG, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Juventus, AC Milan, etc. Overall, I don't consider him world class. Yes he developed almost entirely in Australia. I still regard him as the exception. It's very for a player to have a hope of becoming world class while developing almost entirely in Australia. Certainly, Viduka arrived in the Premier League relatively late. Perhaps if he arrived earlier, he'd have had a hope of being world class in all aspects of his game? Although perhaps not because his issues may have been temperamental. Viduka's teammate Paul Robinson had Viduka as the striker in the Best XI he had ever played with and that includes international teammates. Now he did say he wasn't the best trainer but he always turned up on match day. Stewart Downing named him as the best footballer he's ever played with and that was while Downing was at Liverpool. The clubs you mentioned Man Utd, Barca, Real Madrid, AC Milan and add Inter Milan all at one time made moves for Viduka. The Spanish and Italian clubs had their bids rejected by Leeds the same way the rejected the bids for Kewell. Viduka was if the reports are correct valued at around 20 to 25 million pounds while at Leeds. Sure he may not have been world class throughout his career especially when injuries caught up with him but there's no doubt he was World Class. Fair play. I maintain, skill-wise he was world class. And yep he did most of his development in Aus. But I don't think that, in all aspects of his game, he was world-class. Injuries and club manoeuvring undoubtedly played their part. I also think his mentality may have been the biggest obstacle in his career (and that surely has little to do with developing in Australia, as that's something where Australian football/sport is traditionally strong). He's the type of player whom those who played with/against him will remember his abilities, but history won't in quite the same way. To go down in history as world class, mere ability is not enough. That's not on him though and it doesn't detract from the fact his teammates and opponents rate him as world class. For me us fans don't decide that because we have little to draw on as comparison. If all those he played against or with and the biggest clubs in the world wanted him then that's enough for me to say ok perhaps he was world class. Perhaps he and Harry are the only two we can say in their day they were considered amongst the best in their position (maybe Bozza too). The highest levels of success in football, and any sport, rely on luck to a large extent. How can it not be the case when so much depends on how one's parents/coaches train oneself when one is a child? So many talented sportspeople miss out on achieving greatness despite being, perhaps, the most talented in the world. For all the hard work and talent, there's a huge degree of luck. Unfortunately, history looks at results. History can be a very harsh judge. So it's certainly valid to go by how players are rated by their teammates/opponents to see the full picture. Certainly, Viduka was world class in terms of ability, fleeting achievements and the demand for his services from some very big clubs.
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Kruse will miss the Jordan game. We really need to use our depth here. I'm so disappointed for him.
|
|
|
Mateship
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7,
Visits: 0
|
quickflick wrote:adrtho wrote:quickflick wrote:One of the 442 articles says that a Serie A Primavera side are interested in signing Daniel Arzani while Club Brugge are interested in signing Daniel Maskin. Sydney FC are, apparently, also trying to sign them.
Seriously hope the two go to Italy and Belgium. It's the best thing that can happen to them. They have the chance to progress at the rate of the best European juniors if they go overseas at the end of the year. Otherwise they can stay at Sydney FC until their early 20s like Terry Antonis and just fall behind the rest of the world.
The FFA should be doing everything in its power to facilitate European transfers for these two players and to discourage A-League clubs from getting them (unless the European options fall through).
Not sure if they have European passports, but hopefully there aren't any obstacles in that respect. Terry Antonis fall behide the rest of the world? who are you comparing him to? i hope Daniel Arzani come into A-league....he look far better player then Panos Armenakas and yoy want FFA to hurt A-league clubs and help Australians leave Australia :lol: Edited by adrtho: 16/9/2015 10:15:49 PM When Terry Antonis was a kid, he was regarded as one of the brightest prospects in the world. I'm not sure by whom and it is fairly arbitrary. But we was still seen as a real talent. Don't get me wrong, he can still end up a great Socceroo. But compare him to other world class players born in '93. He won't rate a mention, at the minute. He stayed in the A-League too long. You make a good point that it's beneficial for the A-League/Australian football if the best players play in the A-League. I agree it will help the health of the league. I would agree it would be a problem if the A-League had no talented juniors. But the nuance is this. However much we encourage talented juniors to go to Europe, there will always be a number that stay in Australia. This is because many don't want to leave their friends and family in Australia, many don't want to miss out on the benefit of Australian secondary/tertiary education, many don't have EU passport (and thus find it much tougher to get European contracts), many find Europe a bridge too far culturally. Thus, we'll always have heaps of Australians staying here. These kind of players will fortify the A-League and Australian football. But Australian football needs to be strengthened on several levels. The A-League (the NC, the SAP and domestic pathways) are some important areas where it needs to be strong. But that's not enough. At this stage, it's almost impossible for a player to become truly world class (i.e. being an outstanding player in a side playing knock-out stages of European Champion's League) unless they go to Europe young. We need players who capture the world's attention. That's the best thing for Australian football. May I ask, adrtho, if you saw the thread asking people how they became fans of Australian football? A number said it was seeing Harry Kewell and Mark Viduka being absolutely brilliant in the English Premier League that did it for them. Kewell and Viduka. Those two played a huge part in getting support for Australian football. We need more players like them. Which means we need more players to go to Europe at a young age. Imagine if we have Rogic, Ikonomidis, Armenakas, Brimmer, Arzani, Maskin all playing starring roles at big clubs in Italy, England, Germany, Netherlands, etc? Kids will stay up all night to watch that kind of thing. Kids will imagine themselves being the next Rogic or Ikonomidis. That's when Australian football will really make big strides. Edited by Mateship: 17-9-2015 02:04:00
|
|
|
Krusen
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
quickflick wrote:adrtho wrote:quickflick wrote:One of the 442 articles says that a Serie A Primavera side are interested in signing Daniel Arzani while Club Brugge are interested in signing Daniel Maskin. Sydney FC are, apparently, also trying to sign them.
Seriously hope the two go to Italy and Belgium. It's the best thing that can happen to them. They have the chance to progress at the rate of the best European juniors if they go overseas at the end of the year. Otherwise they can stay at Sydney FC until their early 20s like Terry Antonis and just fall behind the rest of the world.
The FFA should be doing everything in its power to facilitate European transfers for these two players and to discourage A-League clubs from getting them (unless the European options fall through).
Not sure if they have European passports, but hopefully there aren't any obstacles in that respect. Terry Antonis fall behide the rest of the world? who are you comparing him to? i hope Daniel Arzani come into A-league....he look far better player then Panos Armenakas and yoy want FFA to hurt A-league clubs and help Australians leave Australia :lol: Edited by adrtho: 16/9/2015 10:15:49 PM When Terry Antonis was a kid, he was regarded as one of the brightest prospects in the world. I'm not sure by whom and it is fairly arbitrary. But we was still seen as a real talent. Don't get me wrong, he can still end up a great Socceroo. But compare him to other world class players born in '93. He won't rate a mention, at the minute. He stayed in the A-League too long. You make a good point that it's beneficial for the A-League/Australian football if the best players play in the A-League. I agree it will help the health of the league. I would agree it would be a problem if the A-League had no talented juniors. But the nuance is this. However much we encourage talented juniors to go to Europe, there will always be a number that stay in Australia. This is because many don't want to leave their friends and family in Australia, many don't want to miss out on the benefit of Australian secondary/tertiary education, many don't have EU passport (and thus find it much tougher to get European contracts), many find Europe a bridge too far culturally. Thus, we'll always have heaps of Australians staying here. These kind of players will fortify the A-League and Australian football. But Australian football needs to be strengthened on several levels. The A-League (the NC, the SAP and domestic pathways) are some important areas where it needs to be strong. But that's not enough. At this stage, it's almost impossible for a player to become truly world class (i.e. being an outstanding player in a side playing knock-out stages of European Champion's League) unless they go to Europe young. We need players who capture the world's attention. That's the best thing for Australian football. May I ask, adrtho, if you saw the thread asking people how they became fans of Australian football? A number said it was seeing Harry Kewell and Mark Viduka being absolutely brilliant in the English Premier League that did it for them. Kewell and Viduka. Those two played a huge part in getting support for Australian football. We need more players like them. Which means we need more players to go to Europe at a young age.
Imagine if we have Rogic, Ikonomidis, Armenakas, Brimmer, Arzani, Maskin all playing starring roles at big clubs in Italy, England, Germany, Netherlands, etc? Kids will stay up all night to watch that kind of thing. Kids will imagine themselves being the next Rogic or Ikonomidis. That's when Australian football will really make big strides. Viduka turned 20 the year he moved to Europe.
|
|
|
Krusen
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
johnszasz wrote:Kruse will miss the Jordan game. We really need to use our depth here. I'm so disappointed for him. FFS! Our players are made of glass. I hope this doesn't become a constant problem for Robbie.
|
|
|
Krusen
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
It appears that Socceroo coach Ange Postecoglou’s chances of wooing Everton’s talented 19-year-old right back Gethin Jones have taken a nosedive. The West Australian is now a Wales Under 21 international after representing them at Under 17 and Under 19 level and is set to make a senior debut for the Dragons in the next 12 months. Wales’ recent European successes have played no small part in Jones’ decision to give up on a Socceroo cap. Read more at http://www.fourfourtwo.com/au/news/transfer-rumours-australia-loses-jones-gains-neill#fG1jdKToGJbHE00B.99
|
|
|
rick793
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 454,
Visits: 0
|
Caught the last 10-15 of the Randers match. They were already down 3 nil so a fair bit of the sting seemed to be out of the game. Amini knocked it around okay but got nutmegged at one stage which led to a shot on goal. Seemed to be playing as the left sided DM. Got 90 minutes.
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Please don't call him Coach Ange. Fucking cringe.
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Valencia down 2:0 at ht to Zenit.
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Valencia have made it 2:2.
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Both amini and luongo got 90 mins and the Valencia keeper conceded 3 goals at home and lost so eat a dick.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:Both amini and luongo got 90 mins and the Valencia keeper conceded 3 goals at home and lost so eat a dick. Choke on it.
|
|
|
JonoMV
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
johnszasz wrote:Valencia have made it 2:2. Ended 3 - 2 to Zenit. To be honest don't think Ryan would have been able to stop any of them if he was in goal. Valencia lucky to score 2 goals this morning tbh. So Gettin Jones is lost? Oh well lol
|
|
|
kaufusi
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Don't see how Jones is lost by playing U21 matches...
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Games on tonight:
Ajax v Celtic Qabala v PAOK Midgetland v Legia Warsaw Dnipro v Lazio
Also: (for completeness but definitely no aussies)
Napoli v Brugge Sion v Rubin Kazan
Won't be surprised to see no Aussies in action overnight sadly.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
jas88
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
no change rogic will play?
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
jas88 wrote:no change rogic will play? Unlikely tbh
|
|
|
hog1
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 135,
Visits: 0
|
TheSelectFew wrote:jas88 wrote:no change rogic will play? Unlikely tbh I think he blew his chance to up the pecking order last week.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
hog1 wrote:TheSelectFew wrote:jas88 wrote:no change rogic will play? Unlikely tbh I think he blew his chance to up the pecking order last week. I don't think that was the issue. There's already a pecking order that has been well established.
|
|
|
lukerobinho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Surely rogic will play some part
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
I won't be surprised if rogic is rested for this match given his recent busy schedule.
|
|
|