Gay sex ‘gives you worms’


Gay sex ‘gives you worms’

Author
Message
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
how quickly the mob turns to personal attacks and posting childish gif images once out-pointed on a topic
really elevating the discussion :roll:
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
Ricecrackers brand of argumentation right out of the Chomsky notebook:

"Now turning to the facts, ...."

:oops:

Edited by humbert: 2/3/2014 10:36:37 PM
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
Dis thread.


433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
Inb4 people use this to strawman anyone against gay marriage... Oh wait.
A16Man
A16Man
World Class
World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
A16Man wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
perhaps i need to watch dopey documentaries made by comedians to get educated about places i've never been like you

:lol: because I've said that's what I've based all my views on?

As I said before, grow up and get your head out of the clouds.


Perhaps you need to take your own advice. Since being destroyed on the topic at hand you've now turned to making it personal. This not exactly the high road of maturity.

How have I made it personal? You were the one insisting that I'm gay (not that I see that as a bad thing) and keep insisting I've said Stephen Fry's documentary is the basis of my beliefs when I've only ever said it was a good watch.

And you keep insisting you destroyed me when you didn't as it hasn't changed my view on the issue.
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
A16Man wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
perhaps i need to watch dopey documentaries made by comedians to get educated about places i've never been like you

:lol: because I've said that's what I've based all my views on?

As I said before, grow up and get your head out of the clouds.


Perhaps you need to take your own advice. Since being destroyed on the topic at hand you've now turned to making it personal. This not exactly the high road of maturity.
A16Man
A16Man
World Class
World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
perhaps i need to watch dopey documentaries made by comedians to get educated about places i've never been like you

:lol: because I've said that's what I've based all my views on?

As I said before, grow up and get your head out of the clouds.
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
perhaps i need to watch dopey documentaries made by comedians to get educated about places i've never been like you
A16Man
A16Man
World Class
World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
A16Man wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
A16Man wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
it continues to amaze me how you homosexuals equate your plight with racial issues
there is no correlation whatsoever, none

get over yourselves and stop feeling sorry for yourselves and feeling like the world owes you something

you have the same rights as everyone else.

Edited by ricecrackers: 2/3/2014 12:32:29 AM

a) I'm not a homosexual.

b) I wasn't comparing gay rights to racial rights, only using an example of how legal and/or constitutional definitions can and do change over time.


But way to make yourself lose credibility. Someone doesn't agree with your stance on gay rights and suddenly they must be a homosexual.


well if you're not a homosexual, then who are you to speak for them?

:lol: oh god, I'm not even going to argue with you.

And fwiw, I was in no way speaking for "them".


a wise move, since i've obliterated every one of your positions on this matter

:lol: ok mate. You haven't obliterated anything, I just didn't want to get into an internet argument.

Obviously it was a good decision as you have some growing up to do.
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
A16Man wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
A16Man wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
it continues to amaze me how you homosexuals equate your plight with racial issues
there is no correlation whatsoever, none

get over yourselves and stop feeling sorry for yourselves and feeling like the world owes you something

you have the same rights as everyone else.

Edited by ricecrackers: 2/3/2014 12:32:29 AM

a) I'm not a homosexual.

b) I wasn't comparing gay rights to racial rights, only using an example of how legal and/or constitutional definitions can and do change over time.


But way to make yourself lose credibility. Someone doesn't agree with your stance on gay rights and suddenly they must be a homosexual.


well if you're not a homosexual, then who are you to speak for them?

:lol: oh god, I'm not even going to argue with you.

And fwiw, I was in no way speaking for "them".


a wise move, since i've obliterated every one of your positions on this matter
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
A16Man wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
it continues to amaze me how you homosexuals equate your plight with racial issues
there is no correlation whatsoever, none

get over yourselves and stop feeling sorry for yourselves and feeling like the world owes you something

you have the same rights as everyone else.

Edited by ricecrackers: 2/3/2014 12:32:29 AM

a) I'm not a homosexual.

b) I wasn't comparing gay rights to racial rights, only using an example of how legal and/or constitutional definitions can and do change over time.


But way to make yourself lose credibility. Someone doesn't agree with your stance on gay rights and suddenly they must be a homosexual.


well if you're not a homosexual, then who are you to speak for them?


You MUST be a troll.


naming calling = bullying in 2014
i'd be careful if i were you, such activities could land you in jail
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
A16Man wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
it continues to amaze me how you homosexuals equate your plight with racial issues
there is no correlation whatsoever, none

get over yourselves and stop feeling sorry for yourselves and feeling like the world owes you something

you have the same rights as everyone else.

Edited by ricecrackers: 2/3/2014 12:32:29 AM

a) I'm not a homosexual.

b) I wasn't comparing gay rights to racial rights, only using an example of how legal and/or constitutional definitions can and do change over time.


But way to make yourself lose credibility. Someone doesn't agree with your stance on gay rights and suddenly they must be a homosexual.


well if you're not a homosexual, then who are you to speak for them?


You MUST be a troll.
A16Man
A16Man
World Class
World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
A16Man wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
it continues to amaze me how you homosexuals equate your plight with racial issues
there is no correlation whatsoever, none

get over yourselves and stop feeling sorry for yourselves and feeling like the world owes you something

you have the same rights as everyone else.

Edited by ricecrackers: 2/3/2014 12:32:29 AM

a) I'm not a homosexual.

b) I wasn't comparing gay rights to racial rights, only using an example of how legal and/or constitutional definitions can and do change over time.


But way to make yourself lose credibility. Someone doesn't agree with your stance on gay rights and suddenly they must be a homosexual.


well if you're not a homosexual, then who are you to speak for them?

:lol: oh god, I'm not even going to argue with you.

And fwiw, I was in no way speaking for "them".
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
A16Man wrote:
ricecrackers wrote:
it continues to amaze me how you homosexuals equate your plight with racial issues
there is no correlation whatsoever, none

get over yourselves and stop feeling sorry for yourselves and feeling like the world owes you something

you have the same rights as everyone else.

Edited by ricecrackers: 2/3/2014 12:32:29 AM

a) I'm not a homosexual.

b) I wasn't comparing gay rights to racial rights, only using an example of how legal and/or constitutional definitions can and do change over time.


But way to make yourself lose credibility. Someone doesn't agree with your stance on gay rights and suddenly they must be a homosexual.


well if you're not a homosexual, then who are you to speak for them?
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
And there it is right there.

People on this forum just confirming to everybody else that they are nothing but an ignorant, pathetic, insecure homophobe.

Please crawl back under your rocks. The world no longer tolerates your viewpoints.

I'm done here.

Its 2014 FFS.
A16Man
A16Man
World Class
World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K, Visits: 0
ricecrackers wrote:
it continues to amaze me how you homosexuals equate your plight with racial issues
there is no correlation whatsoever, none

get over yourselves and stop feeling sorry for yourselves and feeling like the world owes you something

you have the same rights as everyone else.

Edited by ricecrackers: 2/3/2014 12:32:29 AM

a) I'm not a homosexual.

b) I wasn't comparing gay rights to racial rights, only using an example of how legal and/or constitutional definitions can and do change over time.


But way to make yourself lose credibility. Someone doesn't agree with your stance on gay rights and suddenly they must be a homosexual.
Condemned666
Condemned666
Pro
Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K, Visits: 0
What does redbull give you then?
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
who's views?
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
paladisious wrote:
11.mvfc.11 wrote:
I don't wish to discriminate in any way against gay people, but marriage is and has always been the union of man and woman.

Are you sure about that?

Edited by paladisious: 2/3/2014 01:59:00 AM
Of course, until recently homosexuality was bary tolerated.

Doesn't mean we can't change the definition to reflect the views of 2014.
paladisious
paladisious
Legend
Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K, Visits: 0
11.mvfc.11 wrote:
I don't wish to discriminate in any way against gay people, but marriage is and has always been the union of man and woman.

Are you sure about that?

Edited by paladisious: 2/3/2014 01:59:00 AM
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
it continues to amaze me how you homosexuals equate your plight with racial issues
there is no correlation whatsoever, none

get over yourselves and stop feeling sorry for yourselves and feeling like the world owes you something

you have the same rights as everyone else.

Edited by ricecrackers: 2/3/2014 12:32:29 AM
A16Man
A16Man
World Class
World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K, Visits: 0
11.mvfc.11 wrote:
Marriage wrote:
The formal union of a man and a woman, typically as recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife:


There you have it.

I don't wish to discriminate in any way against gay people, but marriage is and has always been the union of man and woman.

That doesn't mean your love is any less, or that you are being "denied" something. We should allow all the rights that come with marriage to gay civil unions, but the word marriage is not the correct term for these unions.

Aboriginal people were once not included in the Australian census according to the definition in the constitution.

Definitions change over time.
humbert
humbert
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K, Visits: 0
11.mvfc.11 wrote:
Marriage wrote:
The formal union of a man and a woman, typically as recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife:


There you have it.

I don't wish to discriminate in any way against gay people, but marriage is and has always been the union of man and woman.

That doesn't mean your love is any less, or that you are being "denied" something. We should allow all the rights that come with marriage to gay civil unions, but the word marriage is not the correct term for these unions.


A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it the superficial appearance of being right.
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
I get it now.

Two gay men shouldn't be allowed to get married because one of them doesn't have a vagina.

Sorry, I don't know what I must have been thinking. My bad.

Thanks for clearing that up for me.

ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
Limiting the definition of marriage to that only between and man and a woman to the exclusion of all others is a form of discrimination.

In 100 years, people will look back on this time and have great difficulty in understanding why gay people were so poorly treated.


that is the worst justification i've ever heard! listen to yourself

its tantamount to saying limiting the definition of a vagina to the woman's anatomy to the exclusion of a man's butthole is a form of discrimination

u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
Limiting the definition of marriage to that only between and man and a woman to the exclusion of all others is a form of discrimination.

In 100 years, people will look back on this time and have great difficulty in understanding why gay people were so poorly treated.
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
So what is a right then?

I would argue it is a right for all humans not to be discriminated against based on gender, sexuality and race.

Allowing straight people the PRIVILEGE of marriage at the expense of gay people is a form of discrimination.


i just outlined that gay people are afforded the same privilege if they so choose, however they want to change the definition of a word

gays are not lawfully discriminated against in any way in this country
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
So what is a right then?

I would argue it is a right for all humans not to be discriminated against based on gender, sexuality and race.

Allowing straight people the PRIVILEGE of marriage at the expense of gay people is a form of discrimination.
ricecrackers
ricecrackers
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K, Visits: 0
rocknerd wrote:
The right to not be judged because they are attracted to people of the same sex, the right to ivf, the right to adopt the right to privacy,


the right not to be judged? are you serious? do you even know what a right is? i'm judged all the time on various measures.. do i need to complain to the UN for that?

the right to privacy? do you think gays have a less right to privacy than anyone else? what the hell have you been reading?

the right to IVF? again thats not even a right
rocknerd
rocknerd
World Class
World Class (5.7K reputation)World Class (5.7K reputation)World Class (5.7K reputation)World Class (5.7K reputation)World Class (5.7K reputation)World Class (5.7K reputation)World Class (5.7K reputation)World Class (5.7K reputation)World Class (5.7K reputation)World Class (5.7K reputation)World Class (5.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K, Visits: 0
The right to not be judged because they are attracted to people of the same sex, the right to ivf, the right to adopt the right to privacy,
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search