grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x6 centuries and 26 50s from 103 innings is bang on average for an average player averaging 41 Maxwell with a near identical average has 7 centuries and 21 50s from 104 innings. There is also 5 years between the two. Lets invest in the younger man as we are certain to get a better return from him in the longer term. There is talk to return Labu.. with his @33 average. Could this be as they view his bowling useful for Sydney. Will someone inform CA that the SCG is no longer a spinning paradise. if you have white and maxwell you have 2 part time spinners which is enough to give support to lyon but gives you 2 batsmen averaging over 40 Burns Marsh Khawaja Pattison white Maxwell at least we will be competitive then grazor you have now typed Pattison . You are becoming confused with Pattinson I think. Just think patter as in rain drops. I'd have White at #4 to break up the lefties. too many players with similar sounding names :D
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x6 centuries and 26 50s from 103 innings is bang on average for an average player averaging 41 Maxwell with a near identical average has 7 centuries and 21 50s from 104 innings. There is also 5 years between the two. Lets invest in the younger man as we are certain to get a better return from him in the longer term. There is talk to return Labu.. with his @33 average. Could this be as they view his bowling useful for Sydney. Will someone inform CA that the SCG is no longer a spinning paradise. if you have white and maxwell you have 2 part time spinners which is enough to give support to lyon but gives you 2 batsmen averaging over 40 Burns Marsh Khawaja Pattison white Maxwell at least we will be competitive then grazor you have now typed Pattison . You are becoming confused with Pattinson I think. Just think patter as in rain drops. I'd have White at #4 to break up the lefties. too many players with similar sounding names :D Why you sticking with Marsh?
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x6 centuries and 26 50s from 103 innings is bang on average for an average player averaging 41 Maxwell with a near identical average has 7 centuries and 21 50s from 104 innings. There is also 5 years between the two. Lets invest in the younger man as we are certain to get a better return from him in the longer term. There is talk to return Labu.. with his @33 average. Could this be as they view his bowling useful for Sydney. Will someone inform CA that the SCG is no longer a spinning paradise. if you have white and maxwell you have 2 part time spinners which is enough to give support to lyon but gives you 2 batsmen averaging over 40 Burns Marsh Khawaja Pattison white Maxwell at least we will be competitive then grazor you have now typed Pattison . You are becoming confused with Pattinson I think. Just think patter as in rain drops. I'd have White at #4 to break up the lefties. too many players with similar sounding names :D Why you sticking with Marsh? Shaun? As bad as he is I'm not sure we have someone better unless lynn is available. Maybe Wade? Perhaps I've missed someone. Giving Harris another go being a youngster of Pukovski are other options
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x6 centuries and 26 50s from 103 innings is bang on average for an average player averaging 41 Maxwell with a near identical average has 7 centuries and 21 50s from 104 innings. There is also 5 years between the two. Lets invest in the younger man as we are certain to get a better return from him in the longer term. There is talk to return Labu.. with his @33 average. Could this be as they view his bowling useful for Sydney. Will someone inform CA that the SCG is no longer a spinning paradise. if you have white and maxwell you have 2 part time spinners which is enough to give support to lyon but gives you 2 batsmen averaging over 40 Burns Marsh Khawaja Pattison white Maxwell at least we will be competitive then grazor you have now typed Pattison . You are becoming confused with Pattinson I think. Just think patter as in rain drops. I'd have White at #4 to break up the lefties. too many players with similar sounding names :D Why you sticking with Marsh? They are playing. Must have been a break in the rain. But more to come says the radar. Can Cummins get his ton? What coverage do you get of this series in the states?
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x6 centuries and 26 50s from 103 innings is bang on average for an average player averaging 41 Maxwell with a near identical average has 7 centuries and 21 50s from 104 innings. There is also 5 years between the two. Lets invest in the younger man as we are certain to get a better return from him in the longer term. There is talk to return Labu.. with his @33 average. Could this be as they view his bowling useful for Sydney. Will someone inform CA that the SCG is no longer a spinning paradise. if you have white and maxwell you have 2 part time spinners which is enough to give support to lyon but gives you 2 batsmen averaging over 40 Burns Marsh Khawaja Pattison white Maxwell at least we will be competitive then grazor you have now typed Pattison . You are becoming confused with Pattinson I think. Just think patter as in rain drops. I'd have White at #4 to break up the lefties. too many players with similar sounding names :D Why you sticking with Marsh? They are playing. Must have been a break in the rain. But more to come says the radar. Can Cummins get his ton? What coverage do you get of this series in the states? I have to use streams sadly
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
shame about cummins
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Got a good'n from India's best bowler. Hard to pick up where he left off last nite.. He was well and truly in the zone then. Will be all over soon.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
passed 300 one time in the last 8 tests unbelievably poor from the batsmen
So many times when opposition have been in trouble they can just say to themselves "even if we make 200 we probably win"
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
My REPORT CARD:
Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 4 Marsh 5 Paine 5 Cummins 9 Starc 6 Lyon 6 Hazlewood 6
Before y'all jump down my throat. Mitch Marsh gets a pass mark due to his contribution with the ball.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
well that was depressingly quick
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
That didnt take long. Well played India. They have finally won a series on our shores. CA handed them this trophy by the batsmen they picked. India comprehensively superior with the bat and jus t took the points with the ball.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x6 centuries and 26 50s from 103 innings is bang on average for an average player averaging 41 Maxwell with a near identical average has 7 centuries and 21 50s from 104 innings. There is also 5 years between the two. Lets invest in the younger man as we are certain to get a better return from him in the longer term. There is talk to return Labu.. with his @33 average. Could this be as they view his bowling useful for Sydney. Will someone inform CA that the SCG is no longer a spinning paradise. if you have white and maxwell you have 2 part time spinners which is enough to give support to lyon but gives you 2 batsmen averaging over 40 Burns Marsh Khawaja Pattison white Maxwell at least we will be competitive then grazor you have now typed Pattison . You are becoming confused with Pattinson I think. Just think patter as in rain drops. I'd have White at #4 to break up the lefties. too many players with similar sounding names :D Why you sticking with Marsh? Shaun? As bad as he is I'm not sure we have someone better unless lynn is available. Maybe Wade? Perhaps I've missed someone. Giving Harris another go being a youngster of Pukovski are other options Think it would be a touch harsh not to give Harris at least the 4th Test.
|
|
|
jaszyjim
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 224,
Visits: 0
|
+xGot a good'n from India's best bowler. Hard to pick up where he left off last nite.. He was well and truly in the zone then. Will be all over soon. Both Cummins & Lyon looked tired at the crease and played tired looking shots - What they have done in the conditions was impressive but I think finally caught up with them.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
my department castigates us to make sure we use the full range in grading So with that in mind and forgetting who dropped those 5 catches (apart from pain) my scores
Finch 0/10 Harris 2/10 Khawaja 4/10 S Marsh 5/10 M Marsh 4/10 Paine 3/10 Cummins 10/10 Starc 5/10 Hazelwood 4/10 Lyon 2/10
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x6 centuries and 26 50s from 103 innings is bang on average for an average player averaging 41 Maxwell with a near identical average has 7 centuries and 21 50s from 104 innings. There is also 5 years between the two. Lets invest in the younger man as we are certain to get a better return from him in the longer term. There is talk to return Labu.. with his @33 average. Could this be as they view his bowling useful for Sydney. Will someone inform CA that the SCG is no longer a spinning paradise. if you have white and maxwell you have 2 part time spinners which is enough to give support to lyon but gives you 2 batsmen averaging over 40 Burns Marsh Khawaja Pattison white Maxwell at least we will be competitive then grazor you have now typed Pattison . You are becoming confused with Pattinson I think. Just think patter as in rain drops. I'd have White at #4 to break up the lefties. too many players with similar sounding names :D Why you sticking with Marsh? Shaun? As bad as he is I'm not sure we have someone better unless lynn is available. Maybe Wade? Perhaps I've missed someone. Giving Harris another go being a youngster of Pukovski are other options Think it would be a touch harsh not to give Harris at least the 4th Test. yeah ok Marsh Burns Khawaja White Patterson Maxwell Paine Cummins Starc Lyon Tremain
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xmy department castigates us to make sure we use the full range in grading So with that in mind and forgetting who dropped those 5 catches (apart from pain) my scores Finch 0/10 Harris 2/10 Khawaja 4/10 S Marsh 5/10 M Marsh 4/10 Paine 3/10 Cummins 10/10 Starc 5/10 Hazelwood 4/10 Lyon 2/10 That is harsh on our two quicks. Hazlewood outbowled Starc for mine. You were full of praise for their bowling effort on that sweltering day. Lyon toiled hard too. Reason I gave them all same points. Why Paine only 3? You missed Head.
|
|
|
jaszyjim
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 224,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xmy department castigates us to make sure we use the full range in grading So with that in mind and forgetting who dropped those 5 catches (apart from pain) my scores Finch 0/10 Harris 2/10 Khawaja 4/10 S Marsh 5/10 M Marsh 4/10 Paine 3/10 Cummins 10/10 Starc 5/10 Hazelwood 4/10 Lyon 2/10 That is harsh on our two quicks. Hazlewood outbowled Starc for mine. You were full of praise for their bowling effort on that sweltering day. Lyon toiled hard too. Reason I gave them all same points. Why Paine only 3? Missed Head?
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xmy department castigates us to make sure we use the full range in grading So with that in mind and forgetting who dropped those 5 catches (apart from pain) my scores Finch 0/10 Harris 2/10 Khawaja 4/10 S Marsh 5/10 M Marsh 4/10 Paine 3/10 Cummins 10/10 Starc 5/10 Hazelwood 4/10 Lyon 2/10 That is harsh on our two quicks. Hazlewood outbowled Starc for mine. You were full of praise for their bowling effort on that sweltering day. Lyon toiled hard too. Reason I gave them all same points. Why Paine only 3? missed a pivotal catch, sloppy with byes and didn't chip in enough runs They certainly bowled without luck and it was an incredible effort but in the end they didn't break through this test. They got scored higher than most players in the team
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xmy department castigates us to make sure we use the full range in grading So with that in mind and forgetting who dropped those 5 catches (apart from pain) my scores Finch 0/10 Harris 2/10 Khawaja 4/10 S Marsh 5/10 M Marsh 4/10 Paine 3/10 Cummins 10/10 Starc 5/10 Hazelwood 4/10 Lyon 2/10 That is harsh on our two quicks. Hazlewood outbowled Starc for mine. You were full of praise for their bowling effort on that sweltering day. Lyon toiled hard too. Reason I gave them all same points. Why Paine only 3? Missed Head? Good time for a pun about Australia missing their head 4/10ish
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x6 centuries and 26 50s from 103 innings is bang on average for an average player averaging 41 Maxwell with a near identical average has 7 centuries and 21 50s from 104 innings. There is also 5 years between the two. Lets invest in the younger man as we are certain to get a better return from him in the longer term. There is talk to return Labu.. with his @33 average. Could this be as they view his bowling useful for Sydney. Will someone inform CA that the SCG is no longer a spinning paradise. if you have white and maxwell you have 2 part time spinners which is enough to give support to lyon but gives you 2 batsmen averaging over 40 Burns Marsh Khawaja Pattison white Maxwell at least we will be competitive then grazor you have now typed Pattison . You are becoming confused with Pattinson I think. Just think patter as in rain drops. I'd have White at #4 to break up the lefties. too many players with similar sounding names :D Why you sticking with Marsh? Shaun? As bad as he is I'm not sure we have someone better unless lynn is available. Maybe Wade? Perhaps I've missed someone. Giving Harris another go being a youngster of Pukovski are other options Think it would be a touch harsh not to give Harris at least the 4th Test. yeah ok Marsh Burns Khawaja White Patterson Maxwell Paine Cummins Starc Lyon Tremain If you are dumping Hazlewood, Starc has to go too. I want Richardson for him.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xmy department castigates us to make sure we use the full range in grading So with that in mind and forgetting who dropped those 5 catches (apart from pain) my scores Finch 0/10 Harris 2/10 Khawaja 4/10 S Marsh 5/10 M Marsh 4/10 Paine 3/10 Cummins 10/10 Starc 5/10 Hazelwood 4/10 Lyon 2/10 That is harsh on our two quicks. Hazlewood outbowled Starc for mine. You were full of praise for their bowling effort on that sweltering day. Lyon toiled hard too. Reason I gave them all same points. Why Paine only 3? missed a pivotal catch, sloppy with byes and didn't chip in enough runs They certainly bowled without luck and it was an incredible effort but in the end they didn't break through this test. They got scored higher than most players in the team True. This was more a deck for Starc. He was the most disappointing for me.
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. So Australia 4-5's except Cummins 10/10 and Head 6/10
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x6 centuries and 26 50s from 103 innings is bang on average for an average player averaging 41 Maxwell with a near identical average has 7 centuries and 21 50s from 104 innings. There is also 5 years between the two. Lets invest in the younger man as we are certain to get a better return from him in the longer term. There is talk to return Labu.. with his @33 average. Could this be as they view his bowling useful for Sydney. Will someone inform CA that the SCG is no longer a spinning paradise. if you have white and maxwell you have 2 part time spinners which is enough to give support to lyon but gives you 2 batsmen averaging over 40 Burns Marsh Khawaja Pattison white Maxwell at least we will be competitive then grazor you have now typed Pattison . You are becoming confused with Pattinson I think. Just think patter as in rain drops. I'd have White at #4 to break up the lefties. too many players with similar sounding names :D Why you sticking with Marsh? Shaun? As bad as he is I'm not sure we have someone better unless lynn is available. Maybe Wade? Perhaps I've missed someone. Giving Harris another go being a youngster of Pukovski are other options Think it would be a touch harsh not to give Harris at least the 4th Test. yeah ok Marsh Burns Khawaja White Patterson Maxwell Paine Cummins Starc Lyon Tremain If you are dumping Hazlewood, Starc has to also go. I want Richardson for him. Tremain deserves his chance. His record is very good but is he technically as good as Haze?
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia.
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. Sharma bowls 1 Starc bowls 1 Hazlewood bowls 2 Bumrah bowls 2. Can't pick and choose as you want the cards to fall. It is what it is?
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. If not mistaken Bumrah only opened bowling with second new ball. Ishant opened the most. (I stand corrected) I remember thinking Bumrah as their fastest bowler should be opening. Or has the Sydney heatwave got to me?
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. I'g go with that side, but White you have to use common sense he is too old, but then again Smith is back in 3 tests. Jake Lehmann instead of White is another that could go 4/5 with Patterson. I like the idea of Burns and Harris fighting it out for the opening position with Warner's return, may the best man win. I'll go Labuschagne for Sydney only (if does well batting give him Sri Lanka), but Maxwell otherwise.
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. I'g go with that side, but White you have to use common sense he is too old, but then again Smith is back in 3 tests. Jake Lehmann instead of White is another that could go 4/5 with Patterson. I like the idea of Burns and Harris fighting it out for the opening position with Warner's return, may the best man win. I'll go Labuschagne for Sydney only (if does well batting give him Sri Lanka), but Maxwell otherwise. What was I thinking Baggers you got rid of Head our leading run scorer of the series. Get rid of Khawaja as well then. If Patterson comes in he comes in at 4 or 6 or Jake Lehmann but being Sydney Patterson
|
|
|
jaszyjim
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 224,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. Problem is, go back to list of contracted players, no White, Patterson, Labu or Wade. Is everyone forgetting about Renshaw = contracted player & opener. Only non contracted player in current side is Harris. On the basis, Finch, Handscomb & M. Marsh dropped, Contracted test batters; Head, Khawaja, S. Marsh & Renshaw. Contracted test all rounders; Agar & Maxwell Contracted test bowlers; Cummins, Hazlewood, Lyon, J Richardson, Starc. Contracted test keepers; Paine & Carey. Are they going to bring in non contracted players, when they can make wholesale changes to play Sri lanka, to blood young players looking ahead to the Ashes' and this way they don't loose too much face. It will be on their mind not loosing at the SCG, but can they win from the above list?
|
|
|