|
Footballer
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
last night bozza said “With how it’s going right now, the grand final as great as it was, was the lowest-rating grand final in A-League history,”
surely thats not right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xlast night bozza said “With how it’s going right now, the grand final as great as it was, was the lowest-rating grand final in A-League history,” surely thats not right? pretty hard to believe, perhaps he meant for period we've been on FTA
|
|
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xlast night bozza said “With how it’s going right now, the grand final as great as it was, was the lowest-rating grand final in A-League history,” surely thats not right? i don't know if its true, but I thought Bozza's rant was disappointing. He started off talking abouty how concerned he was about the game, but then went into self preservation mode by going on about how good Fox Sports has been to the game.
|
|
|
|
|
aok
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xlast night bozza said “With how it’s going right now, the grand final as great as it was, was the lowest-rating grand final in A-League history,” surely thats not right? i don't know if its true, but I thought Bozza's rant was disappointing. He started off talking abouty how concerned he was about the game, but then went into self preservation mode by going on about how good Fox Sports has been to the game. His rants seem to go off into a few different tangents.
|
|
|
|
|
TheRealFootballSupporter
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 353,
Visits: 0
|
+xlast night bozza said “With how it’s going right now, the grand final as great as it was, was the lowest-rating grand final in A-League history,” surely thats not right? He must have been referring to it being the lowest rated GF on Fox, which is probably true (we don't know streaming numbers).
|
|
|
|
libel
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xlast night bozza said “With how it’s going right now, the grand final as great as it was, was the lowest-rating grand final in A-League history,” surely thats not right? i don't know if its true, but I thought Bozza's rant was disappointing. He started off talking abouty how concerned he was about the game, but then went into self preservation mode by going on about how good Fox Sports has been to the game. It was pretty shameless tbh
|
|
|
|
|
Razor Ramon
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 884,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xlast night bozza said “With how it’s going right now, the grand final as great as it was, was the lowest-rating grand final in A-League history,” surely thats not right? i don't know if its true, but I thought Bozza's rant was disappointing. He started off talking abouty how concerned he was about the game, but then went into self preservation mode by going on about how good Fox Sports has been to the game. the game is in a much better shape now in 2019 compared to 2011. Remarkably, there is no comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
“The AFL has an issue with Foxtel ratings. Down 5.8% on last seasons first 10 rounds, and down more than 17% on 2017s. Second lowest average for this time of the year since the 9 game Fox simulcast deals started in 2012 (beaten to the bottom only by 2015”
FMD .... it’s almost like they’re, you know, WATCHING ON KAYO or something 😂😂👏
|
|
|
|
|
Melbcityguy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x“The AFL has an issue with Foxtel ratings. Down 5.8% on last seasons first 10 rounds, and down more than 17% on 2017s. Second lowest average for this time of the year since the 9 game Fox simulcast deals started in 2012 (beaten to the bottom only by 2015” FMD .... it’s almost like they’re, you know, WATCHING ON KAYO or something 😂😂👏 Shh don’t tell them let them freak out over ratings for once
|
|
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x“The AFL has an issue with Foxtel ratings. Down 5.8% on last seasons first 10 rounds, and down more than 17% on 2017s. Second lowest average for this time of the year since the 9 game Fox simulcast deals started in 2012 (beaten to the bottom only by 2015” FMD .... it’s almost like they’re, you know, WATCHING ON KAYO or something 😂😂👏 yeah but i bet you they have access to streaming figures unlike the HAL
|
|
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x“The AFL has an issue with Foxtel ratings. Down 5.8% on last seasons first 10 rounds, and down more than 17% on 2017s. Second lowest average for this time of the year since the 9 game Fox simulcast deals started in 2012 (beaten to the bottom only by 2015” FMD .... it’s almost like they’re, you know, WATCHING ON KAYO or something 😂😂👏 yeah but i bet you they have access to streaming figures unlike the HAL No they don’t. The streaming figures are commercially sensitive - Fox certainly won’t want the AFL knowing those numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x“The AFL has an issue with Foxtel ratings. Down 5.8% on last seasons first 10 rounds, and down more than 17% on 2017s. Second lowest average for this time of the year since the 9 game Fox simulcast deals started in 2012 (beaten to the bottom only by 2015” FMD .... it’s almost like they’re, you know, WATCHING ON KAYO or something 😂😂👏 yeah but i bet you they have access to streaming figures unlike the HAL No they don’t. The streaming figures are commercially sensitive - Fox certainly won’t want the AFL knowing those numbers. lol
|
|
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xNo they don’t. The streaming figures are commercially sensitive - Fox certainly won’t want the AFL knowing those numbers. well considering the AFL deal is the best part of a billion more than the HAL deal, they may have a little more clout in regards to getting access to this type of stuff. Plus the AFL are much smarter negotiators and are ahead of the game more often than not.
|
|
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xNo they don’t. The streaming figures are commercially sensitive - Fox certainly won’t want the AFL knowing those numbers. well considering the AFL deal is the best part of a billion more than the HAL deal, they may have a little more clout in regards to getting access to this type of stuff. Plus the AFL are much smarter negotiators and are ahead of the game more often than not. I think you’re missing the point. Fox don’t want anyone to know what the figures are, including the AFL. While everyone is guessing Fox has the negotiating hand, if the AFL knows the figures are 10k a game it’s worth x ... if they know it’s 100,000 per game it’s worth xxx - while they’re guessing it’s worth what Kayo say it’s worth. The fundamental point though is AFL viewing is DOWN ... just like the HAL funny that.
|
|
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
That’s weird, I’ve read that Foxsports AFL ratings are down by 5.8% on the first 10 rounds last season and more than 17% from 2017. https://twitter.com/vincerugari/status/1132933531296919555?s=21
|
|
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Yep, so did I. At first I thought because one was talking about Fox and the other about FTA, but the age article is actually talking about both. Could it be The Age is including numbers we are not privy to??
|
|
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xNo they don’t. The streaming figures are commercially sensitive - Fox certainly won’t want the AFL knowing those numbers. well considering the AFL deal is the best part of a billion more than the HAL deal, they may have a little more clout in regards to getting access to this type of stuff. Plus the AFL are much smarter negotiators and are ahead of the game more often than not. I think you’re missing the point. Fox don’t want anyone to know what the figures are, including the AFL. While everyone is guessing Fox has the negotiating hand, if the AFL knows the figures are 10k a game it’s worth x ... if they know it’s 100,000 per game it’s worth xxx - while they’re guessing it’s worth what Kayo say it’s worth. The fundamental point though is AFL viewing is DOWN ... just like the HAL funny that. Waz just thinking out aloud, but Fox do earn revenue from advertisers, so they would need to tell potential advertisers what the numbers are, at least in broad terms, and once that info is out, you'd think the AFL would know about it straight away.
|
|
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Yup, that’s FTA (HAL was up also) but the Fox numbers are tanking. Just like HALs
|
|
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYup, that’s FTA (HAL was up also) but the Fox numbers are tanking. Just like HALs that's what I thought too, but the article says: Ratings on the AFL’s other TV broadcaster, Foxtel, are up by six per cent this year
|
|
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xNo they don’t. The streaming figures are commercially sensitive - Fox certainly won’t want the AFL knowing those numbers. well considering the AFL deal is the best part of a billion more than the HAL deal, they may have a little more clout in regards to getting access to this type of stuff. Plus the AFL are much smarter negotiators and are ahead of the game more often than not. I think you’re missing the point. Fox don’t want anyone to know what the figures are, including the AFL. While everyone is guessing Fox has the negotiating hand, if the AFL knows the figures are 10k a game it’s worth x ... if they know it’s 100,000 per game it’s worth xxx - while they’re guessing it’s worth what Kayo say it’s worth. The fundamental point though is AFL viewing is DOWN ... just like the HAL funny that. Waz just thinking out aloud, but Fox do earn revenue from advertisers, so they would need to tell potential advertisers what the numbers are, at least in broad terms, and once that info is out, you'd think the AFL would know about it straight away. Not quite. Streaming advertising is not the same as FTA/STV advertising which is based purely on eyeballs watching. FTA/STV is one advert for everyone the streaming business model is different. Streaming Adverting is targeted. While Kayo are just carrying the Fox Sports content at the moment along with any Ads the real value comes when they can target ads (eg by geography) which is what advertisers want nowadays. All of us can be watching the same stream but see different ads. In theory, streaming can get three to five times more money per ad sold on STV using data to target the ads to specific audiences, Foxtel are competing with YouTube and Facebook in that regard so even advertisers won’t get the full picture
|
|
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Corrected. Up 3.25% on last year, down 10.8% from 2017 https://twitter.com/footyindustryau/status/1133345713427951616?s=21anyone think this guy is mister football btw?
|
|
|
|
|
The_Wookie
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 346,
Visits: 0
|
No Im not. I did however screw up the calculations on monday night.
|
|
|
|
|
Razor Ramon
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 884,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xNo they don’t. The streaming figures are commercially sensitive - Fox certainly won’t want the AFL knowing those numbers. well considering the AFL deal is the best part of a billion more than the HAL deal, they may have a little more clout in regards to getting access to this type of stuff. Plus the AFL are much smarter negotiators and are ahead of the game more often than not. I think you’re missing the point. Fox don’t want anyone to know what the figures are, including the AFL. While everyone is guessing Fox has the negotiating hand, if the AFL knows the figures are 10k a game it’s worth x ... if they know it’s 100,000 per game it’s worth xxx - while they’re guessing it’s worth what Kayo say it’s worth. The fundamental point though is AFL viewing is DOWN ... just like the HAL funny that. Waz just thinking out aloud, but Fox do earn revenue from advertisers, so they would need to tell potential advertisers what the numbers are, at least in broad terms, and once that info is out, you'd think the AFL would know about it straight away. Not quite. Streaming advertising is not the same as FTA/STV advertising which is based purely on eyeballs watching. FTA/STV is one advert for everyone the streaming business model is different. Streaming Adverting is targeted. While Kayo are just carrying the Fox Sports content at the moment along with any Ads the real value comes when they can target ads (eg by geography) which is what advertisers want nowadays. All of us can be watching the same stream but see different ads. In theory, streaming can get three to five times more money per ad sold on STV using data to target the ads to specific audiences, Foxtel are competing with YouTube and Facebook in that regard so even advertisers won’t get the full picture Im curious how much people would view the A-league if 10 advertised it
|
|
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midfielder
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.7K,
Visits: 0
|
The girls out rated the boys cricket | 10 | 2019 FIFA WOMEN’S WORLD CUP: AUS V ITA LIVEÂ | SBS | 421,000 |
| 15 | ICC CRICKET WORLD CUP 2019 AUS V IND -S1 | Gem | 304,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
570k metro+regional
|
|
|
|
|
Eldar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Plus Optus. Game thread had over 23k tweets
Beaten by Eldar
|
|
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
impressive af.
|
|
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Australia's team!
|
|
|
|