sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xGraham Arnold is an arsehole, pure and simple. Doesn't select his own son in law who no one would have had major problem with as although he is not playing regularly, he at least has the most pedigree as any defender in the squad. Disagree. Sains has struggled, by his own standards, for some time for the Socceroos. Moreover, he hasn't played a lot of club football over the last 7 years. Souttar hasn't played football in over a year, plus the only game Australia has had against a quality side in recent times Sains had a solid game whereas Souttar had an extremely poor one. So, what's the justification in picking him. Bailey Wright has barely played in the championship this year, Rowles has spent the last 3 months out injured and started 8 times in the J2, so why is Sains being singled out. Almost seems like some sort of masterplan from Arnold to divert attention off his other poor and biased squad decisions. Of all the conspiracy theories against Arnie this one is the the best. I mean the fact you have a problem with him not picking his son in law confirms no matter what he does people will have a problem with it.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWho is the in form keeper right now: Ryan or Langerak? As for Langerak's Dortmund career, people make it sound like he was Kalac riding the pine at Milan for the money. He wasn't. Langerak was a young keeper behind an ageing Weidenfeller at the second biggest club in Germany. He would have expected that in time he would have taken over as the number 1, and actually so did the Dortmund fans who were not happy when he was let go. This was peak Dortmund too with a reputation for developing youth. Any young player at a massive club in Europe at the time would have done the same. j So Langerak rode pine?
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWho is the in form keeper right now: Ryan or Langerak? As for Langerak's Dortmund career, people make it sound like he was Kalac riding the pine at Milan for the money. He wasn't. Langerak was a young keeper behind an ageing Weidenfeller at the second biggest club in Germany. He would have expected that in time he would have taken over as the number 1, and actually so did the Dortmund fans who were not happy when he was let go. This was peak Dortmund too with a reputation for developing youth. Any young player at a massive club in Europe at the time would have done the same. j So Langerak rode pine? What? You expect a kid from Melbourne to walk in and be number 1 keeper at Dortmund? He could have walked in to any team in Belgium.
|
|
|
patjennings
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWho is the in form keeper right now: Ryan or Langerak? As for Langerak's Dortmund career, people make it sound like he was Kalac riding the pine at Milan for the money. He wasn't. Langerak was a young keeper behind an ageing Weidenfeller at the second biggest club in Germany. He would have expected that in time he would have taken over as the number 1, and actually so did the Dortmund fans who were not happy when he was let go. This was peak Dortmund too with a reputation for developing youth. Any young player at a massive club in Europe at the time would have done the same. j So Langerak rode pine? What? You expect a kid from Melbourne to walk in and be number 1 keeper at Dortmund? He could have walked in to any team in Belgium. But he didn't - he stayed there for 5 years with little to no game time and people here expected him to start over Maty for the national team. The exact reason why he should now be starting over Maty. You can't use the argument one way and expect it not to be used in other ways. After a while he needed to look for a loan to get game time - and yes Belgium would have been fine. The guy had the potential to be one of our all time great keepers. TBH his career has not lived up to his talent - he should have been playing in Europe constantly and he would have found his way to starting consistently in one of the top leagues.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xWho is the in form keeper right now: Ryan or Langerak? As for Langerak's Dortmund career, people make it sound like he was Kalac riding the pine at Milan for the money. He wasn't. Langerak was a young keeper behind an ageing Weidenfeller at the second biggest club in Germany. He would have expected that in time he would have taken over as the number 1, and actually so did the Dortmund fans who were not happy when he was let go. This was peak Dortmund too with a reputation for developing youth. Any young player at a massive club in Europe at the time would have done the same. j So Langerak rode pine? What? You expect a kid from Melbourne to walk in and be number 1 keeper at Dortmund? He could have walked in to any team in Belgium. But he didn't - he stayed there for 5 years with little to no game time and people here expected him to start over Maty for the national team. The exact reason why he should now be starting over Maty. You can't use the argument one way and expect it not to be used in other ways. After a while he needed to look for a loan to get game time - and yes Belgium would have been fine. The guy had the potential to be one of our all time great keepers. TBH his career has not lived up to his talent - he should have been playing in Europe constantly and he would have found his way to starting consistently in one of the top leagues. Who's using that argument? Between 2012 and 2018 Ryan was rightfully number 1. After 2018 they played roughly the same number of games Add Ryan's poor 2018 World Cup, there is no way Ryan should have been gifted the number 1 like he was this WC cycle. It would have been healthy competition for both if he wasn't. And on that last point, the squad players should be busting a gut in the World Cup camp to get the nod. Langerak would have at least pushed Ryan. Instead- barring some unforseen circumstance, Ryan knows his position against France is safe as no way will Arnold play Vuka, or Redmayne (FFS) As for his career choices when you look the context c 2010 any young A-League player picked by world giants would have done what he did. In hindsight we now know that's not the best development pathway in general but that's in hindsight. Did he stay too long? -maybe, but we don't what he was being told by his club, and besides keepers have long careers anyway.
|
|
|
Booney
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 674,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xWho is the in form keeper right now: Ryan or Langerak? As for Langerak's Dortmund career, people make it sound like he was Kalac riding the pine at Milan for the money. He wasn't. Langerak was a young keeper behind an ageing Weidenfeller at the second biggest club in Germany. He would have expected that in time he would have taken over as the number 1, and actually so did the Dortmund fans who were not happy when he was let go. This was peak Dortmund too with a reputation for developing youth. Any young player at a massive club in Europe at the time would have done the same. j So Langerak rode pine? What? You expect a kid from Melbourne to walk in and be number 1 keeper at Dortmund? He could have walked in to any team in Belgium. But he didn't - he stayed there for 5 years with little to no game time and people here expected him to start over Maty for the national team. The exact reason why he should now be starting over Maty. You can't use the argument one way and expect it not to be used in other ways. After a while he needed to look for a loan to get game time - and yes Belgium would have been fine. The guy had the potential to be one of our all time great keepers. TBH his career has not lived up to his talent - he should have been playing in Europe constantly and he would have found his way to starting consistently in one of the top leagues. Who's using that argument? Between 2012 and 2018 Ryan was rightfully number 1. After 2018 they played roughly the same number of games Add Ryan's poor 2018 World Cup, there is no way Ryan should have been gifted the number 1 like he was this WC cycle. It would have been healthy competition for both if he wasn't. And on that last point, the squad players should be busting a gut in the World Cup camp to get the nod. Langerak would have at least pushed Ryan. Instead- barring some unforseen circumstance, Ryan knows his position against France is safe as no way will Arnold play Vuka, or Redmayne (FFS) As for his career choices when you look the context c 2010 any young A-League player picked by world giants would have done what he did. In hindsight we now know that's not the best development pathway in general but that's in hindsight. Did he stay too long? -maybe, but we don't what he was being told by his club, and besides keepers have long careers anyway. Was Ryan poor in 2018? I can't remember any particular errors from him but you might be able to quote instances.In 2014 when he was a young keeper he was caught out out several times,particularly by Depay's goal for the Dutch which won them the game and cost us a well deserved draw.He possibly should not have been the No 1 keeper in 2014 but there was no other outstanding candidate. It was unfortunate for Langerak that he spent so many years at Dortmund as the No 2 and in that time Ryan was always the first pick for the Socceroos.He is now the team captain and a fixture in the team.He has played with most of the defenders for a a few games at least and he knows their games and they trust him.They don't have the same relationship with Langerak.This may have been a factor in him missing selection as well as Crawley's bias towards keepers he has worked with at CCM,SFC and the NT.
|
|
|
patjennings
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xWho is the in form keeper right now: Ryan or Langerak? As for Langerak's Dortmund career, people make it sound like he was Kalac riding the pine at Milan for the money. He wasn't. Langerak was a young keeper behind an ageing Weidenfeller at the second biggest club in Germany. He would have expected that in time he would have taken over as the number 1, and actually so did the Dortmund fans who were not happy when he was let go. This was peak Dortmund too with a reputation for developing youth. Any young player at a massive club in Europe at the time would have done the same. j So Langerak rode pine? What? You expect a kid from Melbourne to walk in and be number 1 keeper at Dortmund? He could have walked in to any team in Belgium. But he didn't - he stayed there for 5 years with little to no game time and people here expected him to start over Maty for the national team. The exact reason why he should now be starting over Maty. You can't use the argument one way and expect it not to be used in other ways. After a while he needed to look for a loan to get game time - and yes Belgium would have been fine. The guy had the potential to be one of our all time great keepers. TBH his career has not lived up to his talent - he should have been playing in Europe constantly and he would have found his way to starting consistently in one of the top leagues. Who's using that argument? Between 2012 and 2018 Ryan was rightfully number 1. After 2018 they played roughly the same number of games Add Ryan's poor 2018 World Cup, there is no way Ryan should have been gifted the number 1 like he was this WC cycle. It would have been healthy competition for both if he wasn't. And on that last point, the squad players should be busting a gut in the World Cup camp to get the nod. Langerak would have at least pushed Ryan. Instead- barring some unforseen circumstance, Ryan knows his position against France is safe as no way will Arnold play Vuka, or Redmayne (FFS) As for his career choices when you look the context c 2010 any young A-League player picked by world giants would have done what he did. In hindsight we now know that's not the best development pathway in general but that's in hindsight. Did he stay too long? -maybe, but we don't what he was being told by his club, and besides keepers have long careers anyway. Was Ryan poor in 2018? No - he wasn't. But he did get blamed for a number of goals in 2014 where people say he could have saved them. He had one that he should have saved. Most were good goals but a number where where Davidson and to a lesser extent Franjic not playing the offside trap correctly. Many blamed Maty for that when it was essentially the defence marshalled by Spiranovic to blame. A year later at the Asian Cup when Sainsbury was the backline leader we kept a good line in defence.
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWho is the in form keeper right now: Ryan or Langerak? As for Langerak's Dortmund career, people make it sound like he was Kalac riding the pine at Milan for the money. He wasn't. Langerak was a young keeper behind an ageing Weidenfeller at the second biggest club in Germany. He would have expected that in time he would have taken over as the number 1, and actually so did the Dortmund fans who were not happy when he was let go. This was peak Dortmund too with a reputation for developing youth. Any young player at a massive club in Europe at the time would have done the same. j So Langerak rode pine? What? You expect a kid from Melbourne to walk in and be number 1 keeper at Dortmund? He could have walked in to any team in Belgium. Could he have though? His only season in Europe where he was No. 1 was in Bundesliga 2 with Stuggart.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xWho is the in form keeper right now: Ryan or Langerak? As for Langerak's Dortmund career, people make it sound like he was Kalac riding the pine at Milan for the money. He wasn't. Langerak was a young keeper behind an ageing Weidenfeller at the second biggest club in Germany. He would have expected that in time he would have taken over as the number 1, and actually so did the Dortmund fans who were not happy when he was let go. This was peak Dortmund too with a reputation for developing youth. Any young player at a massive club in Europe at the time would have done the same. j So Langerak rode pine? What? You expect a kid from Melbourne to walk in and be number 1 keeper at Dortmund? He could have walked in to any team in Belgium. But he didn't - he stayed there for 5 years with little to no game time and people here expected him to start over Maty for the national team. The exact reason why he should now be starting over Maty. You can't use the argument one way and expect it not to be used in other ways. After a while he needed to look for a loan to get game time - and yes Belgium would have been fine. The guy had the potential to be one of our all time great keepers. TBH his career has not lived up to his talent - he should have been playing in Europe constantly and he would have found his way to starting consistently in one of the top leagues. Who's using that argument? Between 2012 and 2018 Ryan was rightfully number 1. After 2018 they played roughly the same number of games Add Ryan's poor 2018 World Cup, there is no way Ryan should have been gifted the number 1 like he was this WC cycle. It would have been healthy competition for both if he wasn't. And on that last point, the squad players should be busting a gut in the World Cup camp to get the nod. Langerak would have at least pushed Ryan. Instead- barring some unforseen circumstance, Ryan knows his position against France is safe as no way will Arnold play Vuka, or Redmayne (FFS) As for his career choices when you look the context c 2010 any young A-League player picked by world giants would have done what he did. In hindsight we now know that's not the best development pathway in general but that's in hindsight. Did he stay too long? -maybe, but we don't what he was being told by his club, and besides keepers have long careers anyway. Was Ryan poor in 2018? I can't remember any particular errors from him but you might be able to quote instances.In 2014 when he was a young keeper he was caught out out several times,particularly by Depay's goal for the Dutch which won them the game and cost us a well deserved draw.He possibly should not have been the No 1 keeper in 2014 but there was no other outstanding candidate. It was unfortunate for Langerak that he spent so many years at Dortmund as the No 2 and in that time Ryan was always the first pick for the Socceroos.He is now the team captain and a fixture in the team.He has played with most of the defenders for a a few games at least and he knows their games and they trust him.They don't have the same relationship with Langerak.This may have been a factor in him missing selection as well as Crawley's bias towards keepers he has worked with at CCM,SFC and the NT. Of course he was. Peru had 4 shots and scored 2. A taller keeper-or better positiioned one taps the Pogba ricochet shot over the bar.
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xWho is the in form keeper right now: Ryan or Langerak? As for Langerak's Dortmund career, people make it sound like he was Kalac riding the pine at Milan for the money. He wasn't. Langerak was a young keeper behind an ageing Weidenfeller at the second biggest club in Germany. He would have expected that in time he would have taken over as the number 1, and actually so did the Dortmund fans who were not happy when he was let go. This was peak Dortmund too with a reputation for developing youth. Any young player at a massive club in Europe at the time would have done the same. j So Langerak rode pine? What? You expect a kid from Melbourne to walk in and be number 1 keeper at Dortmund? He could have walked in to any team in Belgium. But he didn't - he stayed there for 5 years with little to no game time and people here expected him to start over Maty for the national team. The exact reason why he should now be starting over Maty. You can't use the argument one way and expect it not to be used in other ways. After a while he needed to look for a loan to get game time - and yes Belgium would have been fine. The guy had the potential to be one of our all time great keepers. TBH his career has not lived up to his talent - he should have been playing in Europe constantly and he would have found his way to starting consistently in one of the top leagues. Who's using that argument? Between 2012 and 2018 Ryan was rightfully number 1. After 2018 they played roughly the same number of games Add Ryan's poor 2018 World Cup, there is no way Ryan should have been gifted the number 1 like he was this WC cycle. It would have been healthy competition for both if he wasn't. And on that last point, the squad players should be busting a gut in the World Cup camp to get the nod. Langerak would have at least pushed Ryan. Instead- barring some unforseen circumstance, Ryan knows his position against France is safe as no way will Arnold play Vuka, or Redmayne (FFS) As for his career choices when you look the context c 2010 any young A-League player picked by world giants would have done what he did. In hindsight we now know that's not the best development pathway in general but that's in hindsight. Did he stay too long? -maybe, but we don't what he was being told by his club, and besides keepers have long careers anyway. Was Ryan poor in 2018? I can't remember any particular errors from him but you might be able to quote instances.In 2014 when he was a young keeper he was caught out out several times,particularly by Depay's goal for the Dutch which won them the game and cost us a well deserved draw.He possibly should not have been the No 1 keeper in 2014 but there was no other outstanding candidate. It was unfortunate for Langerak that he spent so many years at Dortmund as the No 2 and in that time Ryan was always the first pick for the Socceroos.He is now the team captain and a fixture in the team.He has played with most of the defenders for a a few games at least and he knows their games and they trust him.They don't have the same relationship with Langerak.This may have been a factor in him missing selection as well as Crawley's bias towards keepers he has worked with at CCM,SFC and the NT. Of course he was. Peru had 4 shots and scored 2. A taller keeper-or better positiioned one taps the Pogba ricochet shot over the bar. How you can possibly blame Ryan for either of Peru's goals I don't know. Debatable if a taller keeper gets the Pogba one or not. Ryan did not have a "poor" tournament in 2018.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Derider
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2K,
Visits: 0
|
I don’t remember Ryan being poor in 2018. He let in 5 goals but I can’t remember any outrageous errors. He was solid without being spectacular or distinguishing himself in any way. He was disappointing in 2014. I expected him to shine in Brazil but he let in some pretty soft goals.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xWho is the in form keeper right now: Ryan or Langerak? As for Langerak's Dortmund career, people make it sound like he was Kalac riding the pine at Milan for the money. He wasn't. Langerak was a young keeper behind an ageing Weidenfeller at the second biggest club in Germany. He would have expected that in time he would have taken over as the number 1, and actually so did the Dortmund fans who were not happy when he was let go. This was peak Dortmund too with a reputation for developing youth. Any young player at a massive club in Europe at the time would have done the same. j So Langerak rode pine? What? You expect a kid from Melbourne to walk in and be number 1 keeper at Dortmund? He could have walked in to any team in Belgium. But he didn't - he stayed there for 5 years with little to no game time and people here expected him to start over Maty for the national team. The exact reason why he should now be starting over Maty. You can't use the argument one way and expect it not to be used in other ways. After a while he needed to look for a loan to get game time - and yes Belgium would have been fine. The guy had the potential to be one of our all time great keepers. TBH his career has not lived up to his talent - he should have been playing in Europe constantly and he would have found his way to starting consistently in one of the top leagues. Who's using that argument? Between 2012 and 2018 Ryan was rightfully number 1. After 2018 they played roughly the same number of games Add Ryan's poor 2018 World Cup, there is no way Ryan should have been gifted the number 1 like he was this WC cycle. It would have been healthy competition for both if he wasn't. And on that last point, the squad players should be busting a gut in the World Cup camp to get the nod. Langerak would have at least pushed Ryan. Instead- barring some unforseen circumstance, Ryan knows his position against France is safe as no way will Arnold play Vuka, or Redmayne (FFS) As for his career choices when you look the context c 2010 any young A-League player picked by world giants would have done what he did. In hindsight we now know that's not the best development pathway in general but that's in hindsight. Did he stay too long? -maybe, but we don't what he was being told by his club, and besides keepers have long careers anyway. Was Ryan poor in 2018? I can't remember any particular errors from him but you might be able to quote instances.In 2014 when he was a young keeper he was caught out out several times,particularly by Depay's goal for the Dutch which won them the game and cost us a well deserved draw.He possibly should not have been the No 1 keeper in 2014 but there was no other outstanding candidate. It was unfortunate for Langerak that he spent so many years at Dortmund as the No 2 and in that time Ryan was always the first pick for the Socceroos.He is now the team captain and a fixture in the team.He has played with most of the defenders for a a few games at least and he knows their games and they trust him.They don't have the same relationship with Langerak.This may have been a factor in him missing selection as well as Crawley's bias towards keepers he has worked with at CCM,SFC and the NT. Of course he was. Peru had 4 shots and scored 2. A taller keeper-or better positiioned one taps the Pogba ricochet shot over the bar. How you can possibly blame Ryan for either of Peru's goals I don't know. Debatable if a taller keeper gets the Pogba one or not. Ryan did not have a "poor" tournament in 2018. The top keepers find a way to save those. There's a reason he ends up at number 2 most places he goes. If the ball is either side of him it goes in. Says it all really.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xWho is the in form keeper right now: Ryan or Langerak? As for Langerak's Dortmund career, people make it sound like he was Kalac riding the pine at Milan for the money. He wasn't. Langerak was a young keeper behind an ageing Weidenfeller at the second biggest club in Germany. He would have expected that in time he would have taken over as the number 1, and actually so did the Dortmund fans who were not happy when he was let go. This was peak Dortmund too with a reputation for developing youth. Any young player at a massive club in Europe at the time would have done the same. j So Langerak rode pine? What? You expect a kid from Melbourne to walk in and be number 1 keeper at Dortmund? He could have walked in to any team in Belgium. But he didn't - he stayed there for 5 years with little to no game time and people here expected him to start over Maty for the national team. The exact reason why he should now be starting over Maty. You can't use the argument one way and expect it not to be used in other ways. After a while he needed to look for a loan to get game time - and yes Belgium would have been fine. The guy had the potential to be one of our all time great keepers. TBH his career has not lived up to his talent - he should have been playing in Europe constantly and he would have found his way to starting consistently in one of the top leagues. Who's using that argument? Between 2012 and 2018 Ryan was rightfully number 1. After 2018 they played roughly the same number of games Add Ryan's poor 2018 World Cup, there is no way Ryan should have been gifted the number 1 like he was this WC cycle. It would have been healthy competition for both if he wasn't. And on that last point, the squad players should be busting a gut in the World Cup camp to get the nod. Langerak would have at least pushed Ryan. Instead- barring some unforseen circumstance, Ryan knows his position against France is safe as no way will Arnold play Vuka, or Redmayne (FFS) As for his career choices when you look the context c 2010 any young A-League player picked by world giants would have done what he did. In hindsight we now know that's not the best development pathway in general but that's in hindsight. Did he stay too long? -maybe, but we don't what he was being told by his club, and besides keepers have long careers anyway. Was Ryan poor in 2018? I can't remember any particular errors from him but you might be able to quote instances.In 2014 when he was a young keeper he was caught out out several times,particularly by Depay's goal for the Dutch which won them the game and cost us a well deserved draw.He possibly should not have been the No 1 keeper in 2014 but there was no other outstanding candidate. It was unfortunate for Langerak that he spent so many years at Dortmund as the No 2 and in that time Ryan was always the first pick for the Socceroos.He is now the team captain and a fixture in the team.He has played with most of the defenders for a a few games at least and he knows their games and they trust him.They don't have the same relationship with Langerak.This may have been a factor in him missing selection as well as Crawley's bias towards keepers he has worked with at CCM,SFC and the NT. Of course he was. Peru had 4 shots and scored 2. A taller keeper-or better positiioned one taps the Pogba ricochet shot over the bar. How you can possibly blame Ryan for either of Peru's goals I don't know. Debatable if a taller keeper gets the Pogba one or not. Ryan did not have a "poor" tournament in 2018. The top keepers find a way to save those. There's a reason he ends up at number 2 most places he goes. If the ball is either side of him it goes in. Says it all really. Exactly.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
They can't prevent every goal. And it's not their fault if it goes in. The expectation, at the highest level, is that the goalkeeper finds a way to do the remarkable thing and save them.
Ryan hasn't demonstrated this ability. And now, isn't even playing regularly. Precisely the reason previously used to justify his selection over Langerak.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xYou don't pick players for the World Cup on the basis of "loyalty" or "doing the road trips". You pick your best and in-form at that moment. Its the WC FFS! It doesn't get any bigger. Pick your best. In any case Ryan is over-rated and probably has more caps than he deserved. He had a terrible 2018 and should have been demoted and made to earn his spot- which on the basis of his club form since- he clearly has not. Langerak was given one chance and had a brain fade and was never seen again. Ryan just watches them go past without even an attempt a save. As for Redmayne, give me a fucking break. He should never be anywhere near any national team. Spot on Guarantee soon the discussions will will be better about which goals Ryan should gave saved. Yep. When the news was leaked, that's what I said. He should definitely go to Qatar. But the notion that he's the best keeper is ludicrous. I think quite simply, he hasn't got the reflexes, agility, leg strength or speed to compensate for his lack of height and lack of wingspan.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xIt's instructive that literally no one agrees with Langerak's non-selection. I do. I’m proud of the decision. He refused national team call-ups. Fuck him. He and Volpato can go and create a little anti-Australia groupchat and bitch all they want about the Socceroos. We should only want players who would die for the shirt and never say no to their country. Quelle surprise! "Die for the shirt" (I realise that you probably didn't mean that literally but jeez). Those words are telling, I think. I'm 95% sure that Langerak has done more for Australian football than you have. By chance, do you dislike Langerak because he poses a threat to Ryan's place in goal? Or did pose a threat.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Look at Vukovic today - utterly flabbergasting he is in the NT
Atrocious display of keeping
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIt's instructive that literally no one agrees with Langerak's non-selection. I do. I’m proud of the decision. He refused national team call-ups. Fuck him. He and Volpato can go and create a little anti-Australia groupchat and bitch all they want about the Socceroos. We should only want players who would die for the shirt and never say no to their country. Quelle surprise! "Die for the shirt" (I realise that you probably didn't mean that literally but jeez). Those words are telling, I think. I'm 95% sure that Langerak has done more for Australian football than you have. By chance, do you dislike Langerak because he poses a threat to Ryan's place in goal? Or did pose a threat. Those last two lines from me were a bit much. Sorry if they were too rough, Bowden. Your opinion is valid and is shared by lots of people in the Australian football community. Totally fine to express it. Hopefully, through discussions such as these we all learn to consider the opinions and perspectives of others. I think that improves us. But yeah, I'll try to be more civil with my words.
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Shocking day for Vukovic. Some players crumble after getting the nod.
On the subject of keepers, it baffles me how Bazunu gets to play for Southampton. 189cm but so often out of reach. Lloris had goals go straight through him yesterday.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
If you choose not to play for the country during qualifying, you don’t deserve to to go the World Cup, simple as that.
I don’t care how good you are.
Picking him sets a precedent of allowing players to pick and choose when to play for the national team and it cheapens the shirt. Playing for Australia is a privilege, not a right.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIf you choose not to play for the country during qualifying, you don’t deserve to to go the World Cup, simple as that. I don’t care how good you are. Picking him sets a precedent of allowing players to pick and choose when to play for the national team and it cheapens the shirt. Playing for Australia is a privilege, not a right. Agree with the last sentence. But it's not a duty, either. That's the distinction which, I think, gets forgotten or ignored. There are other considerations whereby a person might decline a cap (at a particular moment). It could be to do with mental being. It could be to do with family. It could be because of potential negative financial implications for your main job (club football). I don't think that we should have some sort of puritanical court of inquisition which forever banishes a player from the NT simply because they've taken a break (i.e. something that it is totally acceptable in any other profession). It's unfair for the player. It's also to the detriment of the NT.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIf you choose not to play for the country during qualifying, you don’t deserve to to go the World Cup, simple as that. I don’t care how good you are. Picking him sets a precedent of allowing players to pick and choose when to play for the national team and it cheapens the shirt. Playing for Australia is a privilege, not a right. Arzanai didn't play a single minute of qualifiers yet played in the WC. Viduka and Kewell should never have played as much as they did because they skipped qualifiers. Plenty of them. Lucas Neill was captain and skipped qualifiers for family reasons. Its the World Cup. The best should be picked.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xIf you choose not to play for the country during qualifying, you don’t deserve to to go the World Cup, simple as that. I don’t care how good you are. Picking him sets a precedent of allowing players to pick and choose when to play for the national team and it cheapens the shirt. Playing for Australia is a privilege, not a right. Agree with the last sentence. But it's not a duty, either. That's the distinction which, I think, gets forgotten or ignored. There are other considerations whereby a person might decline a cap (at a particular moment). It could be to do with mental being. It could be to do with family. It could be because of potential negative financial implications for your main job (club football). I don't think that we should have some sort of puritanical court of inquisition which forever banishes a player from the NT simply because they've taken a break (i.e. something that it is totally acceptable in any other profession). It's unfair for the player. It's also to the detriment of the NT. I didn’t say he should be banished forever. I’d welcome him back after the World Cup but it’s completely unfair to call up someone who chose not to help get us there over those who made themselves available throughout qualifying.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xIf you choose not to play for the country during qualifying, you don’t deserve to to go the World Cup, simple as that. I don’t care how good you are. Picking him sets a precedent of allowing players to pick and choose when to play for the national team and it cheapens the shirt. Playing for Australia is a privilege, not a right. Arzanai didn't play a single minute of qualifiers yet played in the WC.Viduka and Kewell should never have played as much as they did because they skipped qualifiers. Plenty of them. Lucas Neill was captain and skipped qualifiers for family reasons. Its the World Cup. The best should be picked. He didn’t make himself unavailable though. But yes, as a matter of principle if you flat out refuse to be a part of qualifying (unless there’s a good reason), then no you shouldn’t go to the tournament.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIf you choose not to play for the country during qualifying, you don’t deserve to to go the World Cup, simple as that. I don’t care how good you are. Picking him sets a precedent of allowing players to pick and choose when to play for the national team and it cheapens the shirt. Playing for Australia is a privilege, not a right. Agree with the last sentence. But it's not a duty, either. That's the distinction which, I think, gets forgotten or ignored. There are other considerations whereby a person might decline a cap (at a particular moment). It could be to do with mental being. It could be to do with family. It could be because of potential negative financial implications for your main job (club football). I don't think that we should have some sort of puritanical court of inquisition which forever banishes a player from the NT simply because they've taken a break (i.e. something that it is totally acceptable in any other profession). It's unfair for the player. It's also to the detriment of the NT. I didn’t say he should be banished forever. I’d welcome him back after the World Cup but it’s completely unfair to call up someone who chose not to help get us there over those who made themselves available throughout qualifying. Everybody has different personal circumstances (accentuated by a pandemic). Still, you're right, it isn't fair. But as you also said - playing for Australia is a privilege, not a right. Based on talent and hard work, there are plenty of footballers who deserve to have played for Australia who haven't. Or who deserve to have gone to the World Cup who haven't. Those players whose skills most enhance the NT should be picked.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Vukovic has basically said he got picked because he made himself available for the qualifiers and that he also accepted Ryan is locked in as No1 and that he will not play unless Ryan is injured ( that and because Ryan is captain)
Langerak would likely not have accepted all. that
|
|
|
Dan_The_Red
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIf you choose not to play for the country during qualifying, you don’t deserve to to go the World Cup, simple as that. I don’t care how good you are. Picking him sets a precedent of allowing players to pick and choose when to play for the national team and it cheapens the shirt. Playing for Australia is a privilege, not a right. 100%. But Langerak was talked into returning by Arnie (supposedly) so his previous retirement shouldn’t be a factor.
|
|
|
Derider
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2K,
Visits: 0
|
+xShocking day for Vukovic. Some players crumble after getting the nod. On the subject of keepers, it baffles me how Bazunu gets to play for Southampton. 189cm but so often out of reach. Lloris had goals go straight through him yesterday. Vukovic has been poor all season. But what happened today? Did he make a few howlers?
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIf you choose not to play for the country during qualifying, you don’t deserve to to go the World Cup, simple as that. I don’t care how good you are. Picking him sets a precedent of allowing players to pick and choose when to play for the national team and it cheapens the shirt. Playing for Australia is a privilege, not a right. Arzanai didn't play a single minute of qualifiers yet played in the WC.Viduka and Kewell should never have played as much as they did because they skipped qualifiers. Plenty of them. Lucas Neill was captain and skipped qualifiers for family reasons. Its the World Cup. The best should be picked. He didn’t make himself unavailable though. But yes, as a matter of principle if you flat out refuse to be a part of qualifying (unless there’s a good reason), then no you shouldn’t go to the tournament. So what's a good reason? I guarantee if Volpato progresses and says he was wants to play for us, the new manager will open him with open arms, as he should,
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xIf you choose not to play for the country during qualifying, you don’t deserve to to go the World Cup, simple as that. I don’t care how good you are. Picking him sets a precedent of allowing players to pick and choose when to play for the national team and it cheapens the shirt. Playing for Australia is a privilege, not a right. Arzanai didn't play a single minute of qualifiers yet played in the WC.Viduka and Kewell should never have played as much as they did because they skipped qualifiers. Plenty of them. Lucas Neill was captain and skipped qualifiers for family reasons. Its the World Cup. The best should be picked. He didn’t make himself unavailable though. But yes, as a matter of principle if you flat out refuse to be a part of qualifying (unless there’s a good reason), then no you shouldn’t go to the tournament. So what's a good reason? I guarantee if Volpato progresses and says he was wants to play for us, the new manager will open him with open arms, as he should, Family emergency, mental health break, stuff of that nature. Also Volpato can get in the bin. He was offered the chance to play for us and he turned it down. We shouldn’t get on our hands and knees in order to beg players to play for us.
|
|
|