SlyGoat36
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Scoll wrote:SlyGoat36 wrote:I just blew your mind. No, you're just a bit stupid :lol: 99 Problems nails it. If you have aboriginal heritage, and identify as aboriginal, you get to call yourself aboriginal. Quite false, that lady in America who said she identifies as African-American when she is clearly white. You can't pick and choose as it suits you.
|
|
|
|
Scoll
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
SlyGoat36 wrote:Scoll wrote:SlyGoat36 wrote:I just blew your mind. No, you're just a bit stupid :lol: 99 Problems nails it. If you have aboriginal heritage, and identify as aboriginal, you get to call yourself aboriginal. Quite false, that lady in America who said she identifies as African-American when she is clearly white. You can't pick and choose as it suits you. Bolded the bit in question, since you seem to be a bit slow.
|
|
|
Scoll
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
scubaroo wrote:Scoll wrote:Jeff W wrote:If it was race based then why aren't any of the other 60-70 indigenous players in the AFL being booed. Because those players don't challenge the white assumptions of how an indigenous player should act, nor are there convenient excuses to mask racial reasons for booing those players. If it isn't race based, why is he being booed louder and by more people after taking a stand against racism? Alot of people just don't make the connection between his heritage and his actions on the field. He's just another player that happens to act like an idiot on the field. People always seem to forget that he used to be lauded for what a great player he was. He got older and slowed and the dirty tactics came into his game. Like i stated earlier tony liberatore would be booed incessantly. Hayden ballentyne will cop it when he plays. Milne copped it Way worse than goodes ever has. Its a lost cause. racism is wrong but supporters should be able to boo/support a play with the assumption that they are booing/supporting on non-racist grounds but once one person does it everyone is tarred with the same brush. What happens when the next white player is booed and someone in the crowd is of Asian/aboriginal/african heritage. Is this racism and do we tell everyone to sit dorm and shut up again? And none of this matters. As I've said, it may suck to not be able to express your dislike for a player based on legitimate reasons but the plain and simple fact of the matter is that it now feeds into racism regardless of why you are personally doing it. Even if 90% of the people booing are doing it for no consciously or subconsciously racist reason (which is complete trash, given the voluminous increase in abuse since the race fiasco) the simple matter is there is a racial undertone that has formed the narrative of that abuse. Once you have been told that it is there, consciously choosing to continue to boo is consciously choosing to support and enable that racist element. You cannot boo Goodes and claim to be separate from the racial abuse now, and that isn't Goodes' fault- it is the racist element's fault. Goodes didn't take away your right to boo, white trash racist shitheads did. Think about how you would feel about someone using the swastika and claiming to be separate from the Nazi reading of the symbol? It's not so far removed, really.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
I got a mate who posted up saying hamish mcintosh retired and not becasue of booing. I have no idea why some people are jumping on the bandwagon Hell i got people on my fb who have no inkling for the afl and are saying goodes is a sook .who use dani alves mario ballotelli as examples of players who didnt react.
|
|
|
Fredsta
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Scoll, just out of curiosity do you follow AFL?
|
|
|
Scoll
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Fredsta wrote:Scoll, just out of curiosity do you follow AFL? More than most sports, less than football. I like the sport, but don't watch it religiously. I was a lot more into it when I was younger, but I do feel I am currently more informed than your generic non-follower sports fan due to being surrounded by massive AFL fans. I am, however, also a passionate leftist scumbag ;)
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Lets hope the hoopla and goodes can move on. Itll be a sad day if the idiots who are using this to call goodes a monkey and go back to the zoo win. The boos at the start were about h being a dirty player but now have become anything else. It needs to stop. We called out the indians who moneky called andrew symonds. We shake our heads when mario ballotelli gets called out.we gasp as dani alves gets a banana thrown at him. We mock iuteage when frimpong gets suspended for two games when he responds to the russian idiots who monkey chanted him. But if goodesy does dance we get all uppity.
|
|
|
Fredsta
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Scoll wrote:Fredsta wrote:Scoll, just out of curiosity do you follow AFL? More than most sports, less than football. I like the sport, but don't watch it religiously. I was a lot more into it when I was younger, but I do feel I am currently more informed than your generic non-follower sports fan due to being surrounded by massive AFL fans. I am, however, also a passionate leftist scumbag ;) :lol: Yeah, I didn't want to sound as though I was discounting your knowledge at all. Unlike everyone else ITT I just couldn't remember seeing anything anti or pro AFL in the past from you so I was genuinely curious.
|
|
|
Fredsta
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:We mock iuteage when frimpong gets suspended for two games when he responds to the russian idiots who monkey chanted him. But if goodesy does dance we get all uppity. TBH I don't begrudge Goodes the right to do that as I don't see it as being any different to any other sort of player interaction with opposition fans, but when you do something like that towards opposition supporters they're entitled to a response and honestly I think a boo is a perfectly fine response in that instance. I don't see it as any different to Archie giving shit back to Heart fans after a derby goal, I love seeing that stuff actually, but fans have every right to give it back in these cases IMO. Obviously the booing has evolved past that but I just mean in direct response to the war dance, I don't think that doing it or booing it is a bad thing.
|
|
|
SlyGoat36
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Scoll wrote:SlyGoat36 wrote:Scoll wrote:SlyGoat36 wrote:I just blew your mind. No, you're just a bit stupid :lol: 99 Problems nails it. If you have aboriginal heritage, and identify as aboriginal, you get to call yourself aboriginal. Quite false, that lady in America who said she identifies as African-American when she is clearly white. You can't pick and choose as it suits you. Bolded the bit in question, since you seem to be a bit slow. Ironic :lol:
|
|
|
Scoll
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Fredsta wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:We mock iuteage when frimpong gets suspended for two games when he responds to the russian idiots who monkey chanted him. But if goodesy does dance we get all uppity. TBH I don't begrudge Goodes the right to do that as I don't see it as being any different to any other sort of player interaction with opposition fans, but when you do something like that towards opposition supporters they're entitled to a response and honestly I think a boo is a perfectly fine response in that instance. I don't see it as any different to Archie giving shit back to Heart fans after a derby goal, I love seeing that stuff actually, but fans have every right to give it back in these cases IMO. Obviously the booing has evolved past that but I just mean in direct response to the war dance, I don't think that doing it or booing it is a bad thing. Agree 100%, and I don't recall Goodes having a problem with the crowd response during the celebration either - it was perfectly normal. It was all the carry-on afterwards about whether it was "inciting" the crowd, whether it was "appropriate" and such by boofhead pundits who needed to fill airtime, and journalists needing clickbait. As soon as it became about the acceptability of the "war dance" it became about race, and the media fuelled a negative reaction to it that was inherently racist. Continuing to boo him for what amounts to embracing his non-anglocentric background is all-round poor form.
|
|
|
Scoll
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
SlyGoat36 wrote:Scoll wrote:SlyGoat36 wrote:Scoll wrote:SlyGoat36 wrote:I just blew your mind. No, you're just a bit stupid :lol: 99 Problems nails it. If you have aboriginal heritage, and identify as aboriginal, you get to call yourself aboriginal. Quite false, that lady in America who said she identifies as African-American when she is clearly white. You can't pick and choose as it suits you. Bolded the bit in question, since you seem to be a bit slow. Ironic :lol: and (ənd,(ə)n,and) conjunction 1. used to connect words of the same part of speech, clauses, or sentences, that are to be taken jointly. Rachel Dolezal had no African-American heritage, thus your example is completely off topic. You also clearly don't understand irony*, but that's unsurprising since hardly anyone on the internet does. *unless your posts are part of some Machiavellian plot to redefine racism and some hypothetical external parties are aware of its brilliance and complexity but I, and others in this thread, are not. Edited by Scoll: 29/7/2015 06:41:01 PM
|
|
|
Scoll
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
I'm also flabbergasted that no-one has called me out on Godwin's Law yet, though maybe that's because the comparison was apt? :lol:
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
melbourne_terrace wrote:Jeff W wrote:grazorblade wrote:I've gotta say its hard to see the goodes scenario as anything other than racism. People say the intentions aren't that but when it comes to racism intention isn't the main issue (it would also be hard to call out with being able to read peoples mind) Its the effect that matters and the system. My favourite definition of racism is "a system of disadvantage based on race" The lived experience of an aboriginal even at the elite level is more difficult than an non aboriginal The lived experience of an aboriginal speaking up about issues regarding his people is more difficult than a non aboriginal in Australia That's racism as that's the effect and the system. The intentions that cause this on an individual level is academic. If you shot my wife I don't really care what the intentions are the effect is still the same.
If it was race based then why aren't any of the other 60-70 indigenous players in the AFL being booed. :roll: Why aren't the disliked white players being booed as vociferously?
|
|
|
scubaroo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Scoll wrote:scubaroo wrote:Scoll wrote:Jeff W wrote:If it was race based then why aren't any of the other 60-70 indigenous players in the AFL being booed. Because those players don't challenge the white assumptions of how an indigenous player should act, nor are there convenient excuses to mask racial reasons for booing those players. If it isn't race based, why is he being booed louder and by more people after taking a stand against racism? Alot of people just don't make the connection between his heritage and his actions on the field. He's just another player that happens to act like an idiot on the field. People always seem to forget that he used to be lauded for what a great player he was. He got older and slowed and the dirty tactics came into his game. Like i stated earlier tony liberatore would be booed incessantly. Hayden ballentyne will cop it when he plays. Milne copped it Way worse than goodes ever has. Its a lost cause. racism is wrong but supporters should be able to boo/support a play with the assumption that they are booing/supporting on non-racist grounds but once one person does it everyone is tarred with the same brush. What happens when the next white player is booed and someone in the crowd is of Asian/aboriginal/african heritage. Is this racism and do we tell everyone to sit dorm and shut up again? And none of this matters. As I've said, it may suck to not be able to express your dislike for a player based on legitimate reasons but the plain and simple fact of the matter is that it now feeds into racism regardless of why you are personally doing it. Even if 90% of the people booing are doing it for no consciously or subconsciously racist reason (which is complete trash, given the voluminous increase in abuse since the race fiasco) the simple matter is there is a racial undertone that has formed the narrative of that abuse. Once you have been told that it is there, consciously choosing to continue to boo is consciously choosing to support and enable that racist element. You cannot boo Goodes and claim to be separate from the racial abuse now, and that isn't Goodes' fault- it is the racist element's fault. Goodes didn't take away your right to boo, white trash racist shitheads did. Think about how you would feel about someone using the swastika and claiming to be separate from the Nazi reading of the symbol? It's not so far removed, really. Like the svastika? And its continual use today is asia. .. where it originates and does not have the negative connotations.
|
|
|
melbourne_terrace
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
Well in Richmond.
Viennese Vuck
|
|
|
Jeff W
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 315,
Visits: 0
|
Scoll wrote:scubaroo wrote:Scoll wrote:Jeff W wrote:If it was race based then why aren't any of the other 60-70 indigenous players in the AFL being booed. Because those players don't challenge the white assumptions of how an indigenous player should act, nor are there convenient excuses to mask racial reasons for booing those players. If it isn't race based, why is he being booed louder and by more people after taking a stand against racism? Alot of people just don't make the connection between his heritage and his actions on the field. He's just another player that happens to act like an idiot on the field. People always seem to forget that he used to be lauded for what a great player he was. He got older and slowed and the dirty tactics came into his game. Like i stated earlier tony liberatore would be booed incessantly. Hayden ballentyne will cop it when he plays. Milne copped it Way worse than goodes ever has. Its a lost cause. racism is wrong but supporters should be able to boo/support a play with the assumption that they are booing/supporting on non-racist grounds but once one person does it everyone is tarred with the same brush. What happens when the next white player is booed and someone in the crowd is of Asian/aboriginal/african heritage. Is this racism and do we tell everyone to sit dorm and shut up again? And none of this matters. As I've said, it may suck to not be able to express your dislike for a player based on legitimate reasons but the plain and simple fact of the matter is that it now feeds into racism regardless of why you are personally doing it. Even if 90% of the people booing are doing it for no consciously or subconsciously racist reason (which is complete trash, given the voluminous increase in abuse since the race fiasco) the simple matter is there is a racial undertone that has formed the narrative of that abuse. Once you have been told that it is there, consciously choosing to continue to boo is consciously choosing to support and enable that racist element. You cannot boo Goodes and claim to be separate from the racial abuse now, and that isn't Goodes' fault- it is the racist element's fault. Goodes didn't take away your right to boo, white trash racist shitheads did. Think about how you would feel about someone using the swastika and claiming to be separate from the Nazi reading of the symbol? It's not so far removed, really. OMG! Now we have people comparing booing an opposition player at the footy to wearing a swastika :shock: . This just shows to what ridiculous lengths this thing has got to. As for the main part of your post - It's not the vast majority's fault either but the vast majority of opposition fans are ALL now being called racists for ever booing Goodes. And AFL officialdom scratch their heads and wonder why fans have arced up and taken offence after falsely being accused of being racists and now out of spite boo Goodes even louder and whenever he gets the ball.
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Jeff W wrote:Scoll wrote:scubaroo wrote:Scoll wrote:Jeff W wrote:If it was race based then why aren't any of the other 60-70 indigenous players in the AFL being booed. Because those players don't challenge the white assumptions of how an indigenous player should act, nor are there convenient excuses to mask racial reasons for booing those players. If it isn't race based, why is he being booed louder and by more people after taking a stand against racism? Alot of people just don't make the connection between his heritage and his actions on the field. He's just another player that happens to act like an idiot on the field. People always seem to forget that he used to be lauded for what a great player he was. He got older and slowed and the dirty tactics came into his game. Like i stated earlier tony liberatore would be booed incessantly. Hayden ballentyne will cop it when he plays. Milne copped it Way worse than goodes ever has. Its a lost cause. racism is wrong but supporters should be able to boo/support a play with the assumption that they are booing/supporting on non-racist grounds but once one person does it everyone is tarred with the same brush. What happens when the next white player is booed and someone in the crowd is of Asian/aboriginal/african heritage. Is this racism and do we tell everyone to sit dorm and shut up again? And none of this matters. As I've said, it may suck to not be able to express your dislike for a player based on legitimate reasons but the plain and simple fact of the matter is that it now feeds into racism regardless of why you are personally doing it. Even if 90% of the people booing are doing it for no consciously or subconsciously racist reason (which is complete trash, given the voluminous increase in abuse since the race fiasco) the simple matter is there is a racial undertone that has formed the narrative of that abuse. Once you have been told that it is there, consciously choosing to continue to boo is consciously choosing to support and enable that racist element. You cannot boo Goodes and claim to be separate from the racial abuse now, and that isn't Goodes' fault- it is the racist element's fault. Goodes didn't take away your right to boo, white trash racist shitheads did. Think about how you would feel about someone using the swastika and claiming to be separate from the Nazi reading of the symbol? It's not so far removed, really. OMG! Now we have people comparing booing an opposition player at the footy to wearing a swastika :shock: . This just shows to what ridiculous lengths this thing has got to. As for the main part of your post - It's not the vast majority's fault either but the vast majority of opposition fans are ALL now being called racists for ever booing Goodes. And AFL officialdom scratch their heads and wonder why fans have arced up and taken offence after falsely being accused of being racists and now out of spite boo Goodes even louder and whenever he gets the ball. It was hardly a comparison, it was an analogy. But hey, if you have no actual points to make, it makes sense that you attack something as petty as that.
|
|
|
99 Problems
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Jeff W wrote:Scoll wrote:scubaroo wrote:Scoll wrote:Jeff W wrote:If it was race based then why aren't any of the other 60-70 indigenous players in the AFL being booed. Because those players don't challenge the white assumptions of how an indigenous player should act, nor are there convenient excuses to mask racial reasons for booing those players. If it isn't race based, why is he being booed louder and by more people after taking a stand against racism? Alot of people just don't make the connection between his heritage and his actions on the field. He's just another player that happens to act like an idiot on the field. People always seem to forget that he used to be lauded for what a great player he was. He got older and slowed and the dirty tactics came into his game. Like i stated earlier tony liberatore would be booed incessantly. Hayden ballentyne will cop it when he plays. Milne copped it Way worse than goodes ever has. Its a lost cause. racism is wrong but supporters should be able to boo/support a play with the assumption that they are booing/supporting on non-racist grounds but once one person does it everyone is tarred with the same brush. What happens when the next white player is booed and someone in the crowd is of Asian/aboriginal/african heritage. Is this racism and do we tell everyone to sit dorm and shut up again? And none of this matters. As I've said, it may suck to not be able to express your dislike for a player based on legitimate reasons but the plain and simple fact of the matter is that it now feeds into racism regardless of why you are personally doing it. Even if 90% of the people booing are doing it for no consciously or subconsciously racist reason (which is complete trash, given the voluminous increase in abuse since the race fiasco) the simple matter is there is a racial undertone that has formed the narrative of that abuse. Once you have been told that it is there, consciously choosing to continue to boo is consciously choosing to support and enable that racist element. You cannot boo Goodes and claim to be separate from the racial abuse now, and that isn't Goodes' fault- it is the racist element's fault. Goodes didn't take away your right to boo, white trash racist shitheads did. Think about how you would feel about someone using the swastika and claiming to be separate from the Nazi reading of the symbol? It's not so far removed, really. OMG! Now we have people comparing booing an opposition player at the footy to wearing a swastika :shock: . This just shows to what ridiculous lengths this thing has got to. As for the main part of your post - It's not the vast majority's fault either but the vast majority of opposition fans are ALL now being called racists for ever booing Goodes. And AFL officialdom scratch their heads and wonder why fans have arced up and taken offence after falsely being accused of being racists and now out of spite boo Goodes even louder and whenever he gets the ball. if you boo someone and then are informed that it is being viewed as racist behaviour, so the next time you get the opportunity you boo louder, you are literally proving yourself to be racist. Absolutely great stuff from the Tigers=d>
|
|
|
Jeff W
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 315,
Visits: 0
|
Scoll wrote:Jeff W wrote:If it was race based then why aren't any of the other 60-70 indigenous players in the AFL being booed. Because those players don't challenge the white assumptions of how an indigenous player should act, nor are there convenient excuses to mask racial reasons for booing those players. Nicky Winmar and Michael Long challenged those assumptions. They weren't booed afterwards. They changed attitudes of footy supporters proactively. Scoll wrote: If it isn't race based, why is he being booed louder and by more people after taking a stand against racism?
Because as he's got older and slower, he's resorted to dirty acts, poor sportsmanship and because he's become an arrogant pompous judgemental sook! You see most fans can judge players as individual players based on their actions. The mass booing didn't start after the schoolgirl incident in 2013. The mass booing has grown over this current season. He publicly sulked about being booed and idiotically called ALL opposition fans that boo him racists. Geez, I wonder why he is being booed louder and by more people after he makes offensive sweeping generalised statements about the whole footy supporter base :roll:.
|
|
|
Jeff W
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 315,
Visits: 0
|
99 Problems wrote:Jeff W wrote:Scoll wrote:scubaroo wrote:Scoll wrote:Jeff W wrote:If it was race based then why aren't any of the other 60-70 indigenous players in the AFL being booed. Because those players don't challenge the white assumptions of how an indigenous player should act, nor are there convenient excuses to mask racial reasons for booing those players. If it isn't race based, why is he being booed louder and by more people after taking a stand against racism? Alot of people just don't make the connection between his heritage and his actions on the field. He's just another player that happens to act like an idiot on the field. People always seem to forget that he used to be lauded for what a great player he was. He got older and slowed and the dirty tactics came into his game. Like i stated earlier tony liberatore would be booed incessantly. Hayden ballentyne will cop it when he plays. Milne copped it Way worse than goodes ever has. Its a lost cause. racism is wrong but supporters should be able to boo/support a play with the assumption that they are booing/supporting on non-racist grounds but once one person does it everyone is tarred with the same brush. What happens when the next white player is booed and someone in the crowd is of Asian/aboriginal/african heritage. Is this racism and do we tell everyone to sit dorm and shut up again? And none of this matters. As I've said, it may suck to not be able to express your dislike for a player based on legitimate reasons but the plain and simple fact of the matter is that it now feeds into racism regardless of why you are personally doing it. Even if 90% of the people booing are doing it for no consciously or subconsciously racist reason (which is complete trash, given the voluminous increase in abuse since the race fiasco) the simple matter is there is a racial undertone that has formed the narrative of that abuse. Once you have been told that it is there, consciously choosing to continue to boo is consciously choosing to support and enable that racist element. You cannot boo Goodes and claim to be separate from the racial abuse now, and that isn't Goodes' fault- it is the racist element's fault. Goodes didn't take away your right to boo, white trash racist shitheads did. Think about how you would feel about someone using the swastika and claiming to be separate from the Nazi reading of the symbol? It's not so far removed, really. OMG! Now we have people comparing booing an opposition player at the footy to wearing a swastika :shock: . This just shows to what ridiculous lengths this thing has got to. As for the main part of your post - It's not the vast majority's fault either but the vast majority of opposition fans are ALL now being called racists for ever booing Goodes. And AFL officialdom scratch their heads and wonder why fans have arced up and taken offence after falsely being accused of being racists and now out of spite boo Goodes even louder and whenever he gets the ball. if you boo someone and then are informed that it is being viewed as racist behaviour, so the next time you get the opportunity you boo louder, you are literally proving yourself to be racist. Absolutely great stuff from the Tigers=d> Okay the next time Goodes remonstrates with a Tiger player and runs up to the umpire and falsely makes out Alex Rance slid knees first into Buddy to try to get a free or worse a report (as he did a month ago at the SCG), I'll sit silent and not boo Goodes even though he's a cheat :roll:.
|
|
|
99 Problems
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Jeff W wrote:99 Problems wrote:Jeff W wrote:Scoll wrote:scubaroo wrote:Scoll wrote:Jeff W wrote:If it was race based then why aren't any of the other 60-70 indigenous players in the AFL being booed. Because those players don't challenge the white assumptions of how an indigenous player should act, nor are there convenient excuses to mask racial reasons for booing those players. If it isn't race based, why is he being booed louder and by more people after taking a stand against racism? Alot of people just don't make the connection between his heritage and his actions on the field. He's just another player that happens to act like an idiot on the field. People always seem to forget that he used to be lauded for what a great player he was. He got older and slowed and the dirty tactics came into his game. Like i stated earlier tony liberatore would be booed incessantly. Hayden ballentyne will cop it when he plays. Milne copped it Way worse than goodes ever has. Its a lost cause. racism is wrong but supporters should be able to boo/support a play with the assumption that they are booing/supporting on non-racist grounds but once one person does it everyone is tarred with the same brush. What happens when the next white player is booed and someone in the crowd is of Asian/aboriginal/african heritage. Is this racism and do we tell everyone to sit dorm and shut up again? And none of this matters. As I've said, it may suck to not be able to express your dislike for a player based on legitimate reasons but the plain and simple fact of the matter is that it now feeds into racism regardless of why you are personally doing it. Even if 90% of the people booing are doing it for no consciously or subconsciously racist reason (which is complete trash, given the voluminous increase in abuse since the race fiasco) the simple matter is there is a racial undertone that has formed the narrative of that abuse. Once you have been told that it is there, consciously choosing to continue to boo is consciously choosing to support and enable that racist element. You cannot boo Goodes and claim to be separate from the racial abuse now, and that isn't Goodes' fault- it is the racist element's fault. Goodes didn't take away your right to boo, white trash racist shitheads did. Think about how you would feel about someone using the swastika and claiming to be separate from the Nazi reading of the symbol? It's not so far removed, really. OMG! Now we have people comparing booing an opposition player at the footy to wearing a swastika :shock: . This just shows to what ridiculous lengths this thing has got to. As for the main part of your post - It's not the vast majority's fault either but the vast majority of opposition fans are ALL now being called racists for ever booing Goodes. And AFL officialdom scratch their heads and wonder why fans have arced up and taken offence after falsely being accused of being racists and now out of spite boo Goodes even louder and whenever he gets the ball. if you boo someone and then are informed that it is being viewed as racist behaviour, so the next time you get the opportunity you boo louder, you are literally proving yourself to be racist. Absolutely great stuff from the Tigers=d> Okay the next time Goodes remonstrates with a Tiger player and runs up to the umpire and falsely makes out Alex Rance slid knees first into Buddy to try to get a free or worse a report (as he did a month ago at the SCG), I'll sit silent and not boo Goodes even though he's a cheat :roll:. So I can assume you will boo Joel Selwood, Luke Hodge, Sam Mitchell, Brent Harvey and Jack Riewoldt every time they touch the ball for the rest of their careers? Or is there something different about them perhaps:-k
|
|
|
Jeff W
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 315,
Visits: 0
|
99 Problems wrote:Jeff W wrote:99 Problems wrote:Jeff W wrote:Scoll wrote:scubaroo wrote:Scoll wrote:Jeff W wrote:If it was race based then why aren't any of the other 60-70 indigenous players in the AFL being booed. Because those players don't challenge the white assumptions of how an indigenous player should act, nor are there convenient excuses to mask racial reasons for booing those players. If it isn't race based, why is he being booed louder and by more people after taking a stand against racism? Alot of people just don't make the connection between his heritage and his actions on the field. He's just another player that happens to act like an idiot on the field. People always seem to forget that he used to be lauded for what a great player he was. He got older and slowed and the dirty tactics came into his game. Like i stated earlier tony liberatore would be booed incessantly. Hayden ballentyne will cop it when he plays. Milne copped it Way worse than goodes ever has. Its a lost cause. racism is wrong but supporters should be able to boo/support a play with the assumption that they are booing/supporting on non-racist grounds but once one person does it everyone is tarred with the same brush. What happens when the next white player is booed and someone in the crowd is of Asian/aboriginal/african heritage. Is this racism and do we tell everyone to sit dorm and shut up again? And none of this matters. As I've said, it may suck to not be able to express your dislike for a player based on legitimate reasons but the plain and simple fact of the matter is that it now feeds into racism regardless of why you are personally doing it. Even if 90% of the people booing are doing it for no consciously or subconsciously racist reason (which is complete trash, given the voluminous increase in abuse since the race fiasco) the simple matter is there is a racial undertone that has formed the narrative of that abuse. Once you have been told that it is there, consciously choosing to continue to boo is consciously choosing to support and enable that racist element. You cannot boo Goodes and claim to be separate from the racial abuse now, and that isn't Goodes' fault- it is the racist element's fault. Goodes didn't take away your right to boo, white trash racist shitheads did. Think about how you would feel about someone using the swastika and claiming to be separate from the Nazi reading of the symbol? It's not so far removed, really. OMG! Now we have people comparing booing an opposition player at the footy to wearing a swastika :shock: . This just shows to what ridiculous lengths this thing has got to. As for the main part of your post - It's not the vast majority's fault either but the vast majority of opposition fans are ALL now being called racists for ever booing Goodes. And AFL officialdom scratch their heads and wonder why fans have arced up and taken offence after falsely being accused of being racists and now out of spite boo Goodes even louder and whenever he gets the ball. if you boo someone and then are informed that it is being viewed as racist behaviour, so the next time you get the opportunity you boo louder, you are literally proving yourself to be racist. Absolutely great stuff from the Tigers=d> Okay the next time Goodes remonstrates with a Tiger player and runs up to the umpire and falsely makes out Alex Rance slid knees first into Buddy to try to get a free or worse a report (as he did a month ago at the SCG), I'll sit silent and not boo Goodes even though he's a cheat :roll:. So I can assume you will boo Joel Selwood, Luke Hodge, Sam Mitchell, Brent Harvey and Jack Riewoldt every time they touch the ball for the rest of their careers? Or is there something different about them perhaps:-k Not Jack. Don't boo my own team's players. Selwood not really - only when he gets those dodgy frees for too high. Brett Harvey definitely - another older player who has resorted to dirty acts, sooking and cheating for frees to stay in the game longer. Ballantyne is the worst one for his past thuggish acts followed by Lindsay 'diving' Thomas.
|
|
|
SlyGoat36
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
All you left wing extremists are quite odd.
You get mad when the bogans from reclaim Australia say all Muslims are terrorists because there's a few bad ones. Doesn't that same logic apply to booing Adam Goodes? Sure some people may use racism, but you can't say that everyone who boos him is a racist.
That's a huge genralisation, also a big contradiction.
|
|
|
Cromulent
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
This is quality
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
SlyGoat36 wrote:All you left wing extremists are quite odd. Just wanted to say I appreciate what you're trying to do :lol
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
SlyGoat36
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:SlyGoat36 wrote:All you left wing extremists are quite odd. Just wanted to say I appreciate what you're trying to do :lol Didn't answer the rest of the question ;)
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
SlyGoat36 wrote:mcjules wrote:SlyGoat36 wrote:All you left wing extremists are quite odd. Just wanted to say I appreciate what you're trying to do :lol Didn't answer the rest of the question ;) That's because I'm so extreme, I don't think it warrants a response ;)
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
So now the mother of that child said adam should man up and apolgise. She stated that if he didnt carry on none of this would be going on. I shake my head sometimes.
|
|
|
SlyGoat36
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:SlyGoat36 wrote:mcjules wrote:SlyGoat36 wrote:All you left wing extremists are quite odd. Just wanted to say I appreciate what you're trying to do :lol Didn't answer the rest of the question ;) That's because I'm so extreme, I don't think it warrants a response ;) I win this round ;)
|
|
|