Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xWith the ALM moving to a 14 team competition next season and the NSD commencing with 10 teams, alignment of the pyramid can commence. A couple of seasons running in parallel will clarify the way forward for promotion/ relegation. Football fans can look forward to very exciting times for our game. Galatas said on a recent pod that the FA will select the teams for the NSD next season and it will come in the following season. APL will not usher in two teams during this offseason. No way, not even one. Where are the official expressions of interest and the candidates to start with? NSD in a number of articles from JJ and others have quoted for '23. Have no care what the APL does. Where's that podcast you mention ? post it up. https://www.espn.com.au/football/australian-a-league-men/story/4521449/fa-ceo-james-johnson-outlines-the-roadmap-to-promotion-and-relegation-in-australia The "theory" I heard from a well meaning fan at Olympic Village yesterday is that an announcement is going to be made the Monday AFTER the Aleague grand final whenever that is.... next week, the week after? GF is next Saturday @ 7:45pm. A proper announcement about the NSD would be fantastic next week. It gives us A-League fans something else to talk about during the off season. With the current NPL season well underway, It should give the NPL a bit of a boost and could get some dormant NSL era supporters interested again. Especially at those bigger clubs that are most likely going to be part of the NSD. Damn straight it will :) Keeping my powder well and truly dry on this though.... Lets see what happens.... if anything?
|
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
touch wood we get the news in that case after the coming GF.
Love Football
|
|
|
someguyjc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xWith the ALM moving to a 14 team competition next season and the NSD commencing with 10 teams, alignment of the pyramid can commence. A couple of seasons running in parallel will clarify the way forward for promotion/ relegation. Football fans can look forward to very exciting times for our game. Galatas said on a recent pod that the FA will select the teams for the NSD next season and it will come in the following season. APL will not usher in two teams during this offseason. No way, not even one. Where are the official expressions of interest and the candidates to start with? NSD in a number of articles from JJ and others have quoted for '23. Have no care what the APL does. Where's that podcast you mention ? post it up. https://www.espn.com.au/football/australian-a-league-men/story/4521449/fa-ceo-james-johnson-outlines-the-roadmap-to-promotion-and-relegation-in-australia The "theory" I heard from a well meaning fan at Olympic Village yesterday is that an announcement is going to be made the Monday AFTER the Aleague grand final whenever that is.... next week, the week after? GF is next Saturday @ 7:45pm. A proper announcement about the NSD would be fantastic next week. It gives us A-League fans something else to talk about during the off season. With the current NPL season well underway, It should give the NPL a bit of a boost and could get some dormant NSL era supporters interested again. Especially at those bigger clubs that are most likely going to be part of the NSD.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWith the ALM moving to a 14 team competition next season and the NSD commencing with 10 teams, alignment of the pyramid can commence. A couple of seasons running in parallel will clarify the way forward for promotion/ relegation. Football fans can look forward to very exciting times for our game. Galatas said on a recent pod that the FA will select the teams for the NSD next season and it will come in the following season. APL will not usher in two teams during this offseason. No way, not even one. Where are the official expressions of interest and the candidates to start with? NSD in a number of articles from JJ and others have quoted for '23. Have no care what the APL does. Where's that podcast you mention ? post it up. https://www.espn.com.au/football/australian-a-league-men/story/4521449/fa-ceo-james-johnson-outlines-the-roadmap-to-promotion-and-relegation-in-australia The "theory" I heard from a well meaning fan at Olympic Village yesterday is that an announcement is going to be made the Monday AFTER the Aleague grand final whenever that is.... next week, the week after?
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWith the ALM moving to a 14 team competition next season and the NSD commencing with 10 teams, alignment of the pyramid can commence. A couple of seasons running in parallel will clarify the way forward for promotion/ relegation. Football fans can look forward to very exciting times for our game. Galatas said on a recent pod that the FA will select the teams for the NSD next season and it will come in the following season. APL will not usher in two teams during this offseason. No way, not even one. Where are the official expressions of interest and the candidates to start with? NSD in a number of articles from JJ and others have quoted for '23. Have no care what the APL does. Where's that podcast you mention ? post it up. https://www.espn.com.au/football/australian-a-league-men/story/4521449/fa-ceo-james-johnson-outlines-the-roadmap-to-promotion-and-relegation-in-australia
Love Football
|
|
|
Footballking55
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
We have lived without a Tasmanian team since the A League started. Its a misnomer to think that we MUST HAVE a WA or QLD team in it. Its nice to support the ROAR, but if they were relegated I would still watch A League games on TV.
|
|
|
TheDjentleman
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 362,
Visits: 0
|
If in 20 years, the only teams in the the top flight are only melbourne and sydney based teams so be it. Honestly. My state or city has to work harder then with a different approach to climb up.
Everybodys favourite lurker.
|
|
|
df1982
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 861,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xP & R will never work in Australia. It would scare away the major stakeholders being the club owners - how would you put this to them ‘Thanks for financing your team over the years particularly through Covid but if your team finishes last - your out of the league and will be replaced by a state team that probably will have 500 fans’ It would have every owner running from the game and thus no A-League. This would bring about all the major sponsors leaving as well - they are not going to put money into the game where there are no major financial controls. There is also the issue after a few seasons of P & R Perth , Adelaide and Brisbane being relegated and replaced by teams from NSW & VIC thus becoming a South East League - as an example Which ever way you spin it entire cities/states will have no team… There's a simple way to avoid relegation: don't finish last. Or if you do, make sure your team's good enough that it can bounce back to the top flight the following season. As the A-League expands to 14 and then 16 teams P/R becomes more and more of a necessity. There are only going to be so many clubs who can genuinely make a title challenge. Halfway through the season most of the league already knows they're out of the running, and this will be even more the case when there are 14-16 teams. Relegation will actually give teams in the bottom half something to play for. And why would Perth or Brisbane be worse than the fourth or fifth best Sydney/Melbourne team. They have the population to support top flight clubs and would probably be able to avoid relegation when something is actually on the line. It's more the Central Coasts and Wellingtons (or expansion sides like Canberra, Wollongong, Gold Coast, etc.) who will be the most likely candidates for relegation. The league would easily be able to survive that. Is it a little hypocritical wanting traditional promotion/relegation and then also asking for modern "expansion" sides as opposed to promoted NPL clubs?? Do these expansion sides get a free ride into the NSD or do they start at the bottom of the pyramid in their state comps?? I think you expand the A-League to 16 teams over the next 2-4 years while the NSD beds down and also expands from 12 to 16 teams. Then you introduce P/R. Expansion slots should be reserved for regional areas though. I would particularly prioritise Canberra and Tasmania because they are presently lacking even a semi-pro club and it would basically be impossible for a team to be promoted from the ACT or TAS NPLs to a national-level league.
|
|
|
Heart_fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K,
Visits: 0
|
P&R can work here but as always, it needs to be managed well. It is my understanding that Parachute payments and contract terms to account for these situations are undertaken in many leagues to help assist clubs that are relegated. It all comes down to having the right structures in place, and building the foundations correctly.
i am looking forward to the NSD and see great value in getting it in place as soon as possible. Hopefully the right conversations are being undertaken now to achieve it sooner rather than later.
|
|
|
GDeathe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
In terms of p&r the National Second-division League (NSL) and NPLs is far more important than ALM and NSL p&r because I think bar a few clubs being on a state level is big enough for them and would nope the fuck out of being included on a national stage like a QLD Lions or Gold Coast Knights so how do you make that situation work
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIn the very early years of organised football in England the southern clubs wanted to join in competition with the northern clubs. It was decided that the best clubs, mostly from the north, would play in one league while the remaining clubs would play in a second league. Right from the start the opportunity was created for clubs to be promoted to the first league. Promotion was not automatic and neither was it decided only by performance. The basic principle driving what quickly became P/R was fairness of opportunity to the clubs in the lower league(s). P/R spread from England right across the football world. About 140 years later, because the process was being rorted by unprincipled clubs, FIFA included in its statutes the section on P/R which ensures that where P/R exists it has to be done in a fair way. P/R was and still is about fairness, fairness of opportunity and fairness of process. It is in those terms that we should be considering if, where and how P/R should exist in our football ecosystem. My personal view is that there are three priorities for football. Firstly we need to grow the base level of junior, youth and senior football right across the country. Secondly we need to improve the scouting and player development systems so that talented players move from the base into the competitive community clubs and on to the elite arm of football. Thirdly we need to expand the elite football structure by expanding the ALM and starting the NSD. Those three things will see constant growth in the quality of players and clubs across all levels of the game. A fourth priority is the transfer system but I have left that out because Football Australia has already got that going.
Compared to the three priorities above I don't see P/R having a significant role in improving the quality of football but that doesn't mean that I don't support it. Simply on the basis of aspirational clubs having the opportunity to try to prove themselves at a higher level we should move to P/R at an appropriate time. At the moment with the cost gaps between running ALM, NSD and NPL clubs being much greater than any possible central funding available I don't see P/R as viable. I'd like to see the NSD clubs grow their revenue from the planned $3m+ closer to the current $10m minimum to run an ALM club so that a promoted club has a chance to be competitive before starting up the promotion side of P/R. Hopefully, the NSD will be able to stabilise and start to grow its revenue fairly quickly. As well as central revenue growing individual clubs will grow their revenue at different rates so some aspirational clubs might be ready for promotion sooner than later. I think it will be a suck it and see situation for joining the ALM via promotion. Gyfox, well said and I agree with pretty much all 3 points. Pro/Rel in and of itself is not the cure all and I agree that a degree of for-site needs to go into the predicted revenue capacity of eligible clubs. I think 10 million is reaching for the moon rather than being practical. The longer it takes to implement, the bigger the disparity hence mine, and others, urgency around it... In 10 years time any club outside the Aleague "tent" simply wont have the ability to join a national second tier let alone the fabled pro rel with Aleague..... Aspiration is being choked out of these clubs at a steady pace... enough already. yep and Gyfox...... 1. growing base levels/jnr/youth to Snrs should be the same right across the country, 1 system. TD's/scouts/Development again same as above 1 system. 2. Elite levels is the big issue - ALM will not work with NSD - they have paid a motza they don't want to be part of the overall football eco system. The only bright note it brought was "professionalism" which is great. Whatever happens to them good on them, add a couple more Franchise's but I don't get how putting a club in a particular area gains the many invested fans it needs to grow. WU/Bulls is perfect examples and the previous gone Franchise's. Franchising just won't deliver the needs, the copious amounts of invested footballing families are not supporting AL/M for the past 5yrs and more, whats gonna change. The NSD has far more chance of growing because its exisiting Clubs with a culture and following. $3M is a good starting base the FA etc/Clubs have done the sums its a good base but I believe $5M is getable and should be the target sooner than later, $10M you have got to be kidding/dreaming at these early stages.Yes alot above ticks the box's for growth/development and improve competition/quality and P/R is just the next piece of the puzzle, the carrot that triggers a Club admin we're vying for a Top4 spot and it also inspires and kicks those Clubs in relegation scenarios to work bloody hard those last games in avoiding the drop. AL/M can do its own thing, FA has the plans for the level under NSD, perfecto, this will in the end be the true model introducing P/R. I didn't say they would need $10m I said they would need to have closer to the $10m. A club that's got to $5m, with the addition of the ALM distribution of $1.5m would have a total of $6.5m to work with. I personally think that is short of the minimum needed. I'd hate to see a club regularly struggle on the pitch and be embarrassed and/or struggle to survive financially. With most of the talent development advantages of having an NSD met simply by it existing I don't see the need to rush with P/R. I suppose the new club licensing regulations for the ALM will spell out the minimum non football criteria a club has to meet so the clubs seeking promotion should be able to get their budgets right. As I said in my previous post promotion to the ALM might be a suck it and see issue initially to get a better understanding of the revenue required to be competitive. Surely by now we have to at least have a crack? If we wait for every single duck to be in a row it will be decades if ever. Better to set minimum requirements for promotion and let the cards fall where they may. If a club goes arse up during the season then rejig the draw and keep moving forward. We have to do something. Look at the drama in the EPL and elsewhere at seasons end. We are missing out on so many good stories. The time for talking about is over. Set some minimum criteria for the NSD and lets get going. I'm talking about promotion to the ALM. The NSD should be started as soon as possible. For a club to be promoted they will have to meet all the criteria in the A-League Mens Club Registration Regulations that were recently released by FA. If those regulations follow the FIFA Club Registration Regulations then a club may get provisional registration if they miss a criteria but the provisional registration states a date that the club has to satisfy that criteria or loose its license. I haven't seen the FA regulations so I don't know if provisional registration is allowed. I am concerned for the ongoing existence of promoted clubs that don't have the resources to operate a competitive club in the ALM. What sort of support will they get if they keep losing possibly by large margins? Will they send themselves broke trying? Will they have the resources to operate their development teams down to U12? Would a club failure make other clubs wary of chasing promotion? I'd much rather wait for the NSD to settle in and build its revenue streams and improve its player development programs before moving to promoting clubs into the ALM. The main task for our game is to improve the standard of football in each tier and in my view the standard in each tier is set by the top teams and how they lift the game by their excellence in all facets of the game. In a P/R system the fight to stay up is important for the clubs involved and the battles can be compelling to watch and it will be good when we get those battles in the ALM but by O'Neils design the gap between the ALM and the next level of football is too great for it to bridged quickly so we might just have to wait until the NSD grows stronger. Are you talking about the ALM, a competition where we don't know if the clubs currently competing in it comply with ANY club registration regulations, let alone FIFA proscribed ones? Where, y all accounts, a minority of club owners are currently propping up, financially, the majority of clubs? We know the clubs that meet the AFC requirements for participation in the ACL. They are assessed and the results published every year. Until a month or so ago the only thing the ALM clubs had to satisfy locally were spelt out in their participation agreements which to my knowledge haven't been made public. Hopefully the requirements of the new ALM club licensing regulations will be made public. The ALM clubs were struggling before covid and no doubt they are in a worse situation now but I am not too worried about that. That is the APL and the club owners business. What I don't want to see is clubs that have been around for a long time go to the wall trying to bridge across to the ALM when they aren't really ready.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xIn the very early years of organised football in England the southern clubs wanted to join in competition with the northern clubs. It was decided that the best clubs, mostly from the north, would play in one league while the remaining clubs would play in a second league. Right from the start the opportunity was created for clubs to be promoted to the first league. Promotion was not automatic and neither was it decided only by performance. The basic principle driving what quickly became P/R was fairness of opportunity to the clubs in the lower league(s). P/R spread from England right across the football world. About 140 years later, because the process was being rorted by unprincipled clubs, FIFA included in its statutes the section on P/R which ensures that where P/R exists it has to be done in a fair way. P/R was and still is about fairness, fairness of opportunity and fairness of process. It is in those terms that we should be considering if, where and how P/R should exist in our football ecosystem. My personal view is that there are three priorities for football. Firstly we need to grow the base level of junior, youth and senior football right across the country. Secondly we need to improve the scouting and player development systems so that talented players move from the base into the competitive community clubs and on to the elite arm of football. Thirdly we need to expand the elite football structure by expanding the ALM and starting the NSD. Those three things will see constant growth in the quality of players and clubs across all levels of the game. A fourth priority is the transfer system but I have left that out because Football Australia has already got that going.
Compared to the three priorities above I don't see P/R having a significant role in improving the quality of football but that doesn't mean that I don't support it. Simply on the basis of aspirational clubs having the opportunity to try to prove themselves at a higher level we should move to P/R at an appropriate time. At the moment with the cost gaps between running ALM, NSD and NPL clubs being much greater than any possible central funding available I don't see P/R as viable. I'd like to see the NSD clubs grow their revenue from the planned $3m+ closer to the current $10m minimum to run an ALM club so that a promoted club has a chance to be competitive before starting up the promotion side of P/R. Hopefully, the NSD will be able to stabilise and start to grow its revenue fairly quickly. As well as central revenue growing individual clubs will grow their revenue at different rates so some aspirational clubs might be ready for promotion sooner than later. I think it will be a suck it and see situation for joining the ALM via promotion. Gyfox, well said and I agree with pretty much all 3 points. Pro/Rel in and of itself is not the cure all and I agree that a degree of for-site needs to go into the predicted revenue capacity of eligible clubs. I think 10 million is reaching for the moon rather than being practical. The longer it takes to implement, the bigger the disparity hence mine, and others, urgency around it... In 10 years time any club outside the Aleague "tent" simply wont have the ability to join a national second tier let alone the fabled pro rel with Aleague..... Aspiration is being choked out of these clubs at a steady pace... enough already. yep and Gyfox...... 1. growing base levels/jnr/youth to Snrs should be the same right across the country, 1 system. TD's/scouts/Development again same as above 1 system. 2. Elite levels is the big issue - ALM will not work with NSD - they have paid a motza they don't want to be part of the overall football eco system. The only bright note it brought was "professionalism" which is great. Whatever happens to them good on them, add a couple more Franchise's but I don't get how putting a club in a particular area gains the many invested fans it needs to grow. WU/Bulls is perfect examples and the previous gone Franchise's. Franchising just won't deliver the needs, the copious amounts of invested footballing families are not supporting AL/M for the past 5yrs and more, whats gonna change. The NSD has far more chance of growing because its exisiting Clubs with a culture and following. $3M is a good starting base the FA etc/Clubs have done the sums its a good base but I believe $5M is getable and should be the target sooner than later, $10M you have got to be kidding/dreaming at these early stages.Yes alot above ticks the box's for growth/development and improve competition/quality and P/R is just the next piece of the puzzle, the carrot that triggers a Club admin we're vying for a Top4 spot and it also inspires and kicks those Clubs in relegation scenarios to work bloody hard those last games in avoiding the drop. AL/M can do its own thing, FA has the plans for the level under NSD, perfecto, this will in the end be the true model introducing P/R. I didn't say they would need $10m I said they would need to have closer to the $10m. A club that's got to $5m, with the addition of the ALM distribution of $1.5m would have a total of $6.5m to work with. I personally think that is short of the minimum needed. I'd hate to see a club regularly struggle on the pitch and be embarrassed and/or struggle to survive financially. With most of the talent development advantages of having an NSD met simply by it existing I don't see the need to rush with P/R. I suppose the new club licensing regulations for the ALM will spell out the minimum non football criteria a club has to meet so the clubs seeking promotion should be able to get their budgets right. As I said in my previous post promotion to the ALM might be a suck it and see issue initially to get a better understanding of the revenue required to be competitive. Surely by now we have to at least have a crack? If we wait for every single duck to be in a row it will be decades if ever. Better to set minimum requirements for promotion and let the cards fall where they may. If a club goes arse up during the season then rejig the draw and keep moving forward. We have to do something. Look at the drama in the EPL and elsewhere at seasons end. We are missing out on so many good stories. The time for talking about is over. Set some minimum criteria for the NSD and lets get going. I'm talking about promotion to the ALM. The NSD should be started as soon as possible. For a club to be promoted they will have to meet all the criteria in the A-League Mens Club Registration Regulations that were recently released by FA. If those regulations follow the FIFA Club Registration Regulations then a club may get provisional registration if they miss a criteria but the provisional registration states a date that the club has to satisfy that criteria or loose its license. I haven't seen the FA regulations so I don't know if provisional registration is allowed. I am concerned for the ongoing existence of promoted clubs that don't have the resources to operate a competitive club in the ALM. What sort of support will they get if they keep losing possibly by large margins? Will they send themselves broke trying? Will they have the resources to operate their development teams down to U12? Would a club failure make other clubs wary of chasing promotion? I'd much rather wait for the NSD to settle in and build its revenue streams and improve its player development programs before moving to promoting clubs into the ALM. The main task for our game is to improve the standard of football in each tier and in my view the standard in each tier is set by the top teams and how they lift the game by their excellence in all facets of the game. In a P/R system the fight to stay up is important for the clubs involved and the battles can be compelling to watch and it will be good when we get those battles in the ALM but by O'Neils design the gap between the ALM and the next level of football is too great for it to bridged quickly so we might just have to wait until the NSD grows stronger. Are you talking about the ALM, a competition where we don't know if the clubs currently competing in it comply with ANY club registration regulations, let alone FIFA proscribed ones? Where, y all accounts, a minority of club owners are currently propping up, financially, the majority of clubs?
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xIn the very early years of organised football in England the southern clubs wanted to join in competition with the northern clubs. It was decided that the best clubs, mostly from the north, would play in one league while the remaining clubs would play in a second league. Right from the start the opportunity was created for clubs to be promoted to the first league. Promotion was not automatic and neither was it decided only by performance. The basic principle driving what quickly became P/R was fairness of opportunity to the clubs in the lower league(s). P/R spread from England right across the football world. About 140 years later, because the process was being rorted by unprincipled clubs, FIFA included in its statutes the section on P/R which ensures that where P/R exists it has to be done in a fair way. P/R was and still is about fairness, fairness of opportunity and fairness of process. It is in those terms that we should be considering if, where and how P/R should exist in our football ecosystem. My personal view is that there are three priorities for football. Firstly we need to grow the base level of junior, youth and senior football right across the country. Secondly we need to improve the scouting and player development systems so that talented players move from the base into the competitive community clubs and on to the elite arm of football. Thirdly we need to expand the elite football structure by expanding the ALM and starting the NSD. Those three things will see constant growth in the quality of players and clubs across all levels of the game. A fourth priority is the transfer system but I have left that out because Football Australia has already got that going.
Compared to the three priorities above I don't see P/R having a significant role in improving the quality of football but that doesn't mean that I don't support it. Simply on the basis of aspirational clubs having the opportunity to try to prove themselves at a higher level we should move to P/R at an appropriate time. At the moment with the cost gaps between running ALM, NSD and NPL clubs being much greater than any possible central funding available I don't see P/R as viable. I'd like to see the NSD clubs grow their revenue from the planned $3m+ closer to the current $10m minimum to run an ALM club so that a promoted club has a chance to be competitive before starting up the promotion side of P/R. Hopefully, the NSD will be able to stabilise and start to grow its revenue fairly quickly. As well as central revenue growing individual clubs will grow their revenue at different rates so some aspirational clubs might be ready for promotion sooner than later. I think it will be a suck it and see situation for joining the ALM via promotion. Gyfox, well said and I agree with pretty much all 3 points. Pro/Rel in and of itself is not the cure all and I agree that a degree of for-site needs to go into the predicted revenue capacity of eligible clubs. I think 10 million is reaching for the moon rather than being practical. The longer it takes to implement, the bigger the disparity hence mine, and others, urgency around it... In 10 years time any club outside the Aleague "tent" simply wont have the ability to join a national second tier let alone the fabled pro rel with Aleague..... Aspiration is being choked out of these clubs at a steady pace... enough already. yep and Gyfox...... 1. growing base levels/jnr/youth to Snrs should be the same right across the country, 1 system. TD's/scouts/Development again same as above 1 system. 2. Elite levels is the big issue - ALM will not work with NSD - they have paid a motza they don't want to be part of the overall football eco system. The only bright note it brought was "professionalism" which is great. Whatever happens to them good on them, add a couple more Franchise's but I don't get how putting a club in a particular area gains the many invested fans it needs to grow. WU/Bulls is perfect examples and the previous gone Franchise's. Franchising just won't deliver the needs, the copious amounts of invested footballing families are not supporting AL/M for the past 5yrs and more, whats gonna change. The NSD has far more chance of growing because its exisiting Clubs with a culture and following. $3M is a good starting base the FA etc/Clubs have done the sums its a good base but I believe $5M is getable and should be the target sooner than later, $10M you have got to be kidding/dreaming at these early stages.Yes alot above ticks the box's for growth/development and improve competition/quality and P/R is just the next piece of the puzzle, the carrot that triggers a Club admin we're vying for a Top4 spot and it also inspires and kicks those Clubs in relegation scenarios to work bloody hard those last games in avoiding the drop. AL/M can do its own thing, FA has the plans for the level under NSD, perfecto, this will in the end be the true model introducing P/R. I didn't say they would need $10m I said they would need to have closer to the $10m. A club that's got to $5m, with the addition of the ALM distribution of $1.5m would have a total of $6.5m to work with. I personally think that is short of the minimum needed. I'd hate to see a club regularly struggle on the pitch and be embarrassed and/or struggle to survive financially. With most of the talent development advantages of having an NSD met simply by it existing I don't see the need to rush with P/R. I suppose the new club licensing regulations for the ALM will spell out the minimum non football criteria a club has to meet so the clubs seeking promotion should be able to get their budgets right. As I said in my previous post promotion to the ALM might be a suck it and see issue initially to get a better understanding of the revenue required to be competitive. Surely by now we have to at least have a crack? If we wait for every single duck to be in a row it will be decades if ever. Better to set minimum requirements for promotion and let the cards fall where they may. If a club goes arse up during the season then rejig the draw and keep moving forward. We have to do something. Look at the drama in the EPL and elsewhere at seasons end. We are missing out on so many good stories. The time for talking about is over. Set some minimum criteria for the NSD and lets get going. I'm talking about promotion to the ALM. The NSD should be started as soon as possible. For a club to be promoted they will have to meet all the criteria in the A-League Mens Club Registration Regulations that were recently released by FA. If those regulations follow the FIFA Club Registration Regulations then a club may get provisional registration if they miss a criteria but the provisional registration states a date that the club has to satisfy that criteria or loose its license. I haven't seen the FA regulations so I don't know if provisional registration is allowed. I am concerned for the ongoing existence of promoted clubs that don't have the resources to operate a competitive club in the ALM. What sort of support will they get if they keep losing possibly by large margins? Will they send themselves broke trying? Will they have the resources to operate their development teams down to U12? Would a club failure make other clubs wary of chasing promotion? I'd much rather wait for the NSD to settle in and build its revenue streams and improve its player development programs before moving to promoting clubs into the ALM. The main task for our game is to improve the standard of football in each tier and in my view the standard in each tier is set by the top teams and how they lift the game by their excellence in all facets of the game. In a P/R system the fight to stay up is important for the clubs involved and the battles can be compelling to watch and it will be good when we get those battles in the ALM but by O'Neils design the gap between the ALM and the next level of football is too great for it to bridged quickly so we might just have to wait until the NSD grows stronger.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWith the ALM moving to a 14 team competition next season and the NSD commencing with 10 teams, alignment of the pyramid can commence. A couple of seasons running in parallel will clarify the way forward for promotion/ relegation. Football fans can look forward to very exciting times for our game. Is the All Stars team one of the new expansion clubs?
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWith the ALM moving to a 14 team competition next season and the NSD commencing with 10 teams, alignment of the pyramid can commence. A couple of seasons running in parallel will clarify the way forward for promotion/ relegation. Football fans can look forward to very exciting times for our game. Galatas said on a recent pod that the FA will select the teams for the NSD next season and it will come in the following season. APL will not usher in two teams during this offseason. No way, not even one. Where are the official expressions of interest and the candidates to start with?
|
|
|
libelous
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 889,
Visits: 0
|
With the ALM moving to a 14 team competition next season and the NSD commencing with 10 teams, alignment of the pyramid can commence. A couple of seasons running in parallel will clarify the way forward for promotion/ relegation.
Football fans can look forward to very exciting times for our game.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xIn the very early years of organised football in England the southern clubs wanted to join in competition with the northern clubs. It was decided that the best clubs, mostly from the north, would play in one league while the remaining clubs would play in a second league. Right from the start the opportunity was created for clubs to be promoted to the first league. Promotion was not automatic and neither was it decided only by performance. The basic principle driving what quickly became P/R was fairness of opportunity to the clubs in the lower league(s). P/R spread from England right across the football world. About 140 years later, because the process was being rorted by unprincipled clubs, FIFA included in its statutes the section on P/R which ensures that where P/R exists it has to be done in a fair way. P/R was and still is about fairness, fairness of opportunity and fairness of process. It is in those terms that we should be considering if, where and how P/R should exist in our football ecosystem. My personal view is that there are three priorities for football. Firstly we need to grow the base level of junior, youth and senior football right across the country. Secondly we need to improve the scouting and player development systems so that talented players move from the base into the competitive community clubs and on to the elite arm of football. Thirdly we need to expand the elite football structure by expanding the ALM and starting the NSD. Those three things will see constant growth in the quality of players and clubs across all levels of the game. A fourth priority is the transfer system but I have left that out because Football Australia has already got that going.
Compared to the three priorities above I don't see P/R having a significant role in improving the quality of football but that doesn't mean that I don't support it. Simply on the basis of aspirational clubs having the opportunity to try to prove themselves at a higher level we should move to P/R at an appropriate time. At the moment with the cost gaps between running ALM, NSD and NPL clubs being much greater than any possible central funding available I don't see P/R as viable. I'd like to see the NSD clubs grow their revenue from the planned $3m+ closer to the current $10m minimum to run an ALM club so that a promoted club has a chance to be competitive before starting up the promotion side of P/R. Hopefully, the NSD will be able to stabilise and start to grow its revenue fairly quickly. As well as central revenue growing individual clubs will grow their revenue at different rates so some aspirational clubs might be ready for promotion sooner than later. I think it will be a suck it and see situation for joining the ALM via promotion. Gyfox, well said and I agree with pretty much all 3 points. Pro/Rel in and of itself is not the cure all and I agree that a degree of for-site needs to go into the predicted revenue capacity of eligible clubs. I think 10 million is reaching for the moon rather than being practical. The longer it takes to implement, the bigger the disparity hence mine, and others, urgency around it... In 10 years time any club outside the Aleague "tent" simply wont have the ability to join a national second tier let alone the fabled pro rel with Aleague..... Aspiration is being choked out of these clubs at a steady pace... enough already. yep and Gyfox...... 1. growing base levels/jnr/youth to Snrs should be the same right across the country, 1 system. TD's/scouts/Development again same as above 1 system. 2. Elite levels is the big issue - ALM will not work with NSD - they have paid a motza they don't want to be part of the overall football eco system. The only bright note it brought was "professionalism" which is great. Whatever happens to them good on them, add a couple more Franchise's but I don't get how putting a club in a particular area gains the many invested fans it needs to grow. WU/Bulls is perfect examples and the previous gone Franchise's. Franchising just won't deliver the needs, the copious amounts of invested footballing families are not supporting AL/M for the past 5yrs and more, whats gonna change. The NSD has far more chance of growing because its exisiting Clubs with a culture and following. $3M is a good starting base the FA etc/Clubs have done the sums its a good base but I believe $5M is getable and should be the target sooner than later, $10M you have got to be kidding/dreaming at these early stages.Yes alot above ticks the box's for growth/development and improve competition/quality and P/R is just the next piece of the puzzle, the carrot that triggers a Club admin we're vying for a Top4 spot and it also inspires and kicks those Clubs in relegation scenarios to work bloody hard those last games in avoiding the drop. AL/M can do its own thing, FA has the plans for the level under NSD, perfecto, this will in the end be the true model introducing P/R. I didn't say they would need $10m I said they would need to have closer to the $10m. A club that's got to $5m, with the addition of the ALM distribution of $1.5m would have a total of $6.5m to work with. I personally think that is short of the minimum needed. I'd hate to see a club regularly struggle on the pitch and be embarrassed and/or struggle to survive financially. With most of the talent development advantages of having an NSD met simply by it existing I don't see the need to rush with P/R. I suppose the new club licensing regulations for the ALM will spell out the minimum non football criteria a club has to meet so the clubs seeking promotion should be able to get their budgets right. As I said in my previous post promotion to the ALM might be a suck it and see issue initially to get a better understanding of the revenue required to be competitive. Surely by now we have to at least have a crack? If we wait for every single duck to be in a row it will be decades if ever. Better to set minimum requirements for promotion and let the cards fall where they may. If a club goes arse up during the season then rejig the draw and keep moving forward. We have to do something. Look at the drama in the EPL and elsewhere at seasons end. We are missing out on so many good stories. The time for talking about is over. Set some minimum criteria for the NSD and lets get going.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIn the very early years of organised football in England the southern clubs wanted to join in competition with the northern clubs. It was decided that the best clubs, mostly from the north, would play in one league while the remaining clubs would play in a second league. Right from the start the opportunity was created for clubs to be promoted to the first league. Promotion was not automatic and neither was it decided only by performance. The basic principle driving what quickly became P/R was fairness of opportunity to the clubs in the lower league(s). P/R spread from England right across the football world. About 140 years later, because the process was being rorted by unprincipled clubs, FIFA included in its statutes the section on P/R which ensures that where P/R exists it has to be done in a fair way. P/R was and still is about fairness, fairness of opportunity and fairness of process. It is in those terms that we should be considering if, where and how P/R should exist in our football ecosystem. My personal view is that there are three priorities for football. Firstly we need to grow the base level of junior, youth and senior football right across the country. Secondly we need to improve the scouting and player development systems so that talented players move from the base into the competitive community clubs and on to the elite arm of football. Thirdly we need to expand the elite football structure by expanding the ALM and starting the NSD. Those three things will see constant growth in the quality of players and clubs across all levels of the game. A fourth priority is the transfer system but I have left that out because Football Australia has already got that going.
Compared to the three priorities above I don't see P/R having a significant role in improving the quality of football but that doesn't mean that I don't support it. Simply on the basis of aspirational clubs having the opportunity to try to prove themselves at a higher level we should move to P/R at an appropriate time. At the moment with the cost gaps between running ALM, NSD and NPL clubs being much greater than any possible central funding available I don't see P/R as viable. I'd like to see the NSD clubs grow their revenue from the planned $3m+ closer to the current $10m minimum to run an ALM club so that a promoted club has a chance to be competitive before starting up the promotion side of P/R. Hopefully, the NSD will be able to stabilise and start to grow its revenue fairly quickly. As well as central revenue growing individual clubs will grow their revenue at different rates so some aspirational clubs might be ready for promotion sooner than later. I think it will be a suck it and see situation for joining the ALM via promotion. Gyfox, well said and I agree with pretty much all 3 points. Pro/Rel in and of itself is not the cure all and I agree that a degree of for-site needs to go into the predicted revenue capacity of eligible clubs. I think 10 million is reaching for the moon rather than being practical. The longer it takes to implement, the bigger the disparity hence mine, and others, urgency around it... In 10 years time any club outside the Aleague "tent" simply wont have the ability to join a national second tier let alone the fabled pro rel with Aleague..... Aspiration is being choked out of these clubs at a steady pace... enough already. yep and Gyfox...... 1. growing base levels/jnr/youth to Snrs should be the same right across the country, 1 system. TD's/scouts/Development again same as above 1 system. 2. Elite levels is the big issue - ALM will not work with NSD - they have paid a motza they don't want to be part of the overall football eco system. The only bright note it brought was "professionalism" which is great. Whatever happens to them good on them, add a couple more Franchise's but I don't get how putting a club in a particular area gains the many invested fans it needs to grow. WU/Bulls is perfect examples and the previous gone Franchise's. Franchising just won't deliver the needs, the copious amounts of invested footballing families are not supporting AL/M for the past 5yrs and more, whats gonna change. The NSD has far more chance of growing because its exisiting Clubs with a culture and following. $3M is a good starting base the FA etc/Clubs have done the sums its a good base but I believe $5M is getable and should be the target sooner than later, $10M you have got to be kidding/dreaming at these early stages.Yes alot above ticks the box's for growth/development and improve competition/quality and P/R is just the next piece of the puzzle, the carrot that triggers a Club admin we're vying for a Top4 spot and it also inspires and kicks those Clubs in relegation scenarios to work bloody hard those last games in avoiding the drop. AL/M can do its own thing, FA has the plans for the level under NSD, perfecto, this will in the end be the true model introducing P/R. I didn't say they would need $10m I said they would need to have closer to the $10m. A club that's got to $5m, with the addition of the ALM distribution of $1.5m would have a total of $6.5m to work with. I personally think that is short of the minimum needed. I'd hate to see a club regularly struggle on the pitch and be embarrassed and/or struggle to survive financially. With most of the talent development advantages of having an NSD met simply by it existing I don't see the need to rush with P/R. I suppose the new club licensing regulations for the ALM will spell out the minimum non football criteria a club has to meet so the clubs seeking promotion should be able to get their budgets right. As I said in my previous post promotion to the ALM might be a suck it and see issue initially to get a better understanding of the revenue required to be competitive.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xP & R will never work in Australia. It would scare away the major stakeholders being the club owners - how would you put this to them ‘Thanks for financing your team over the years particularly through Covid but if your team finishes last - your out of the league and will be replaced by a state team that probably will have 500 fans’ It would have every owner running from the game and thus no A-League. This would bring about all the major sponsors leaving as well - they are not going to put money into the game where there are no major financial controls. There is also the issue after a few seasons of P & R Perth , Adelaide and Brisbane being relegated and replaced by teams from NSW & VIC thus becoming a South East League - as an example Which ever way you spin it entire cities/states will have no team… Yeah. It can never work anywhere. Perfect examples of it not working are in third world countries like Somalia and Ethiopia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somali_First_Divisionhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethiopian_Premier_League For the record; I want to see P & R here. I think it can work. I want it to work. It is something that no other sport in Australia (AFL/ NRL / Basketball / cricket / RU) has at the top level and would make us truly unique in the Australian sporting landscape. BUT: We are unique. I know this is stated derisively on this forum at times, but that doesn't stop being it a fact. We are the 6th biggest country in the world by size but waaaayyy down the list in terms of population, or the amount of $$$ available to football. In most countries around the world, a team just needs to invest in a bus and they can get anywhere in a few hours (or a day at most). For an Australian state league team to promote to national level, it involves a huge increase in costs & overheads. So it needs to be implemented carefully to ensure that teams, and the A-League and the new NSD all survive and eventually thrive under the system. But to say it again: I want to see P & R here. I think it can work. I want it to work. It is something that no other sport in Australia (AFL/ NRL / Basketball / cricket / RU) has at the top level and would make us truly unique in the Australian sporting landscape. BTW: Muz, the Somali example isn't great. 9 of the 10 teams are from one city (Mogadishu, obviously), and the other is from a town 100 kms away. Even a 3rd-world country can manage that. To compare to Australia, imagine that Somalia stretched all the way west to the Gulf of Guinea, which is roughly the east-west width of Australia. Would they have promotion and relegation in that case? But to say it again: I want to see P & R here. I think it can work. I want it to work. It is something that no other sport in Australia (AFL/ NRL / Basketball / cricket / RU) has at the top level and would make us truly unique in the Australian sporting landscape. Ok forget Somalia pick any of the other 180+ countries that have pro / rel. Travel is a non-issue if the ALMs calve off, say $1.5 million per year from the TV deal and use that a centralised grant for travel. Any shortfall could be made up by the clubs.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
someguyjc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xP & R will never work in Australia. It would scare away the major stakeholders being the club owners - how would you put this to them ‘Thanks for financing your team over the years particularly through Covid but if your team finishes last - your out of the league and will be replaced by a state team that probably will have 500 fans’ It would have every owner running from the game and thus no A-League. This would bring about all the major sponsors leaving as well - they are not going to put money into the game where there are no major financial controls. There is also the issue after a few seasons of P & R Perth , Adelaide and Brisbane being relegated and replaced by teams from NSW & VIC thus becoming a South East League - as an example Which ever way you spin it entire cities/states will have no team… Yeah. It can never work anywhere. Perfect examples of it not working are in third world countries like Somalia and Ethiopia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somali_First_Divisionhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethiopian_Premier_League BUT: We are unique. I know this is stated derisively on this forum at times, but that doesn't stop being it a fact. We are the 6th biggest country in the world by size but waaaayyy down the list in terms of population, or the amount of $$$ available to football. In most countries around the world, a team just needs to invest in a bus and they can get anywhere in a few hours (or a day at most). For an Australian state league team to promote to national level, it involves a huge increase in costs & overheads. So it needs to be implemented carefully to ensure that teams, and the A-League and the new NSD all survive and eventually thrive under the system. Travel is a complete non-issue. Yes we are big, but our interstate transport infrastructure is very good and very affordable. In relation to the A-League and the future NSD, the league pays for the travel expenses not the individual clubs. If a NSD club one day gets promoted to the A-League, their travel expenses will be covered by the APL.
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xP & R will never work in Australia. It would scare away the major stakeholders being the club owners - how would you put this to them ‘Thanks for financing your team over the years particularly through Covid but if your team finishes last - your out of the league and will be replaced by a state team that probably will have 500 fans’ It would have every owner running from the game and thus no A-League. This would bring about all the major sponsors leaving as well - they are not going to put money into the game where there are no major financial controls. There is also the issue after a few seasons of P & R Perth , Adelaide and Brisbane being relegated and replaced by teams from NSW & VIC thus becoming a South East League - as an example Which ever way you spin it entire cities/states will have no team… Yeah. It can never work anywhere. Perfect examples of it not working are in third world countries like Somalia and Ethiopia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somali_First_Divisionhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethiopian_Premier_League For the record; I want to see P & R here. I think it can work. I want it to work. It is something that no other sport in Australia (AFL/ NRL / Basketball / cricket / RU) has at the top level and would make us truly unique in the Australian sporting landscape. BUT: We are unique. I know this is stated derisively on this forum at times, but that doesn't stop being it a fact. We are the 6th biggest country in the world by size but waaaayyy down the list in terms of population, or the amount of $$$ available to football. In most countries around the world, a team just needs to invest in a bus and they can get anywhere in a few hours (or a day at most). For an Australian state league team to promote to national level, it involves a huge increase in costs & overheads. So it needs to be implemented carefully to ensure that teams, and the A-League and the new NSD all survive and eventually thrive under the system. But to say it again: I want to see P & R here. I think it can work. I want it to work. It is something that no other sport in Australia (AFL/ NRL / Basketball / cricket / RU) has at the top level and would make us truly unique in the Australian sporting landscape. BTW: Muz, the Somali example isn't great. 9 of the 10 teams are from one city (Mogadishu, obviously), and the other is from a town 100 kms away. Even a 3rd-world country can manage that. To compare to Australia, imagine that Somalia stretched all the way west to the Gulf of Guinea, which is roughly the east-west width of Australia. Would they have promotion and relegation in that case? But to say it again: I want to see P & R here. I think it can work. I want it to work. It is something that no other sport in Australia (AFL/ NRL / Basketball / cricket / RU) has at the top level and would make us truly unique in the Australian sporting landscape.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIn the very early years of organised football in England the southern clubs wanted to join in competition with the northern clubs. It was decided that the best clubs, mostly from the north, would play in one league while the remaining clubs would play in a second league. Right from the start the opportunity was created for clubs to be promoted to the first league. Promotion was not automatic and neither was it decided only by performance. The basic principle driving what quickly became P/R was fairness of opportunity to the clubs in the lower league(s). P/R spread from England right across the football world. About 140 years later, because the process was being rorted by unprincipled clubs, FIFA included in its statutes the section on P/R which ensures that where P/R exists it has to be done in a fair way. P/R was and still is about fairness, fairness of opportunity and fairness of process. It is in those terms that we should be considering if, where and how P/R should exist in our football ecosystem. My personal view is that there are three priorities for football. Firstly we need to grow the base level of junior, youth and senior football right across the country. Secondly we need to improve the scouting and player development systems so that talented players move from the base into the competitive community clubs and on to the elite arm of football. Thirdly we need to expand the elite football structure by expanding the ALM and starting the NSD. Those three things will see constant growth in the quality of players and clubs across all levels of the game. A fourth priority is the transfer system but I have left that out because Football Australia has already got that going.
Compared to the three priorities above I don't see P/R having a significant role in improving the quality of football but that doesn't mean that I don't support it. Simply on the basis of aspirational clubs having the opportunity to try to prove themselves at a higher level we should move to P/R at an appropriate time. At the moment with the cost gaps between running ALM, NSD and NPL clubs being much greater than any possible central funding available I don't see P/R as viable. I'd like to see the NSD clubs grow their revenue from the planned $3m+ closer to the current $10m minimum to run an ALM club so that a promoted club has a chance to be competitive before starting up the promotion side of P/R. Hopefully, the NSD will be able to stabilise and start to grow its revenue fairly quickly. As well as central revenue growing individual clubs will grow their revenue at different rates so some aspirational clubs might be ready for promotion sooner than later. I think it will be a suck it and see situation for joining the ALM via promotion. Gyfox, well said and I agree with pretty much all 3 points. Pro/Rel in and of itself is not the cure all and I agree that a degree of for-site needs to go into the predicted revenue capacity of eligible clubs. I think 10 million is reaching for the moon rather than being practical. The longer it takes to implement, the bigger the disparity hence mine, and others, urgency around it... In 10 years time any club outside the Aleague "tent" simply wont have the ability to join a national second tier let alone the fabled pro rel with Aleague..... Aspiration is being choked out of these clubs at a steady pace... enough already. yep and Gyfox...... 1. growing base levels/jnr/youth to Snrs should be the same right across the country, 1 system. TD's/scouts/Development again same as above 1 system. 2. Elite levels is the big issue - ALM will not work with NSD - they have paid a motza they don't want to be part of the overall football eco system. The only bright note it brought was "professionalism" which is great. Whatever happens to them good on them, add a couple more Franchise's but I don't get how putting a club in a particular area gains the many invested fans it needs to grow. WU/Bulls is perfect examples and the previous gone Franchise's. Franchising just won't deliver the needs, the copious amounts of invested footballing families are not supporting AL/M for the past 5yrs and more, whats gonna change. The NSD has far more chance of growing because its exisiting Clubs with a culture and following. $3M is a good starting base the FA etc/Clubs have done the sums its a good base but I believe $5M is getable and should be the target sooner than later, $10M you have got to be kidding/dreaming at these early stages. Yes alot above ticks the box's for growth/development and improve competition/quality and P/R is just the next piece of the puzzle, the carrot that triggers a Club admin we're vying for a Top4 spot and it also inspires and kicks those Clubs in relegation scenarios to work bloody hard those last games in avoiding the drop. AL/M can do its own thing, FA has the plans for the level under NSD, perfecto, this will in the end be the true model introducing P/R. Well said mate.
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xIn the very early years of organised football in England the southern clubs wanted to join in competition with the northern clubs. It was decided that the best clubs, mostly from the north, would play in one league while the remaining clubs would play in a second league. Right from the start the opportunity was created for clubs to be promoted to the first league. Promotion was not automatic and neither was it decided only by performance. The basic principle driving what quickly became P/R was fairness of opportunity to the clubs in the lower league(s). P/R spread from England right across the football world. About 140 years later, because the process was being rorted by unprincipled clubs, FIFA included in its statutes the section on P/R which ensures that where P/R exists it has to be done in a fair way. P/R was and still is about fairness, fairness of opportunity and fairness of process. It is in those terms that we should be considering if, where and how P/R should exist in our football ecosystem. My personal view is that there are three priorities for football. Firstly we need to grow the base level of junior, youth and senior football right across the country. Secondly we need to improve the scouting and player development systems so that talented players move from the base into the competitive community clubs and on to the elite arm of football. Thirdly we need to expand the elite football structure by expanding the ALM and starting the NSD. Those three things will see constant growth in the quality of players and clubs across all levels of the game. A fourth priority is the transfer system but I have left that out because Football Australia has already got that going.
Compared to the three priorities above I don't see P/R having a significant role in improving the quality of football but that doesn't mean that I don't support it. Simply on the basis of aspirational clubs having the opportunity to try to prove themselves at a higher level we should move to P/R at an appropriate time. At the moment with the cost gaps between running ALM, NSD and NPL clubs being much greater than any possible central funding available I don't see P/R as viable. I'd like to see the NSD clubs grow their revenue from the planned $3m+ closer to the current $10m minimum to run an ALM club so that a promoted club has a chance to be competitive before starting up the promotion side of P/R. Hopefully, the NSD will be able to stabilise and start to grow its revenue fairly quickly. As well as central revenue growing individual clubs will grow their revenue at different rates so some aspirational clubs might be ready for promotion sooner than later. I think it will be a suck it and see situation for joining the ALM via promotion. Gyfox, well said and I agree with pretty much all 3 points. Pro/Rel in and of itself is not the cure all and I agree that a degree of for-site needs to go into the predicted revenue capacity of eligible clubs. I think 10 million is reaching for the moon rather than being practical. The longer it takes to implement, the bigger the disparity hence mine, and others, urgency around it... In 10 years time any club outside the Aleague "tent" simply wont have the ability to join a national second tier let alone the fabled pro rel with Aleague..... Aspiration is being choked out of these clubs at a steady pace... enough already. yep and Gyfox...... 1. growing base levels/jnr/youth to Snrs should be the same right across the country, 1 system. TD's/scouts/Development again same as above 1 system. 2. Elite levels is the big issue - ALM will not work with NSD - they have paid a motza they don't want to be part of the overall football eco system. The only bright note it brought was "professionalism" which is great. Whatever happens to them good on them, add a couple more Franchise's but I don't get how putting a club in a particular area gains the many invested fans it needs to grow. WU/Bulls is perfect examples and the previous gone Franchise's. Franchising just won't deliver the needs, the copious amounts of invested footballing families are not supporting AL/M for the past 5yrs and more, whats gonna change. The NSD has far more chance of growing because its exisiting Clubs with a culture and following. $3M is a good starting base the FA etc/Clubs have done the sums its a good base but I believe $5M is getable and should be the target sooner than later, $10M you have got to be kidding/dreaming at these early stages. Yes alot above ticks the box's for growth/development and improve competition/quality and P/R is just the next piece of the puzzle, the carrot that triggers a Club admin we're vying for a Top4 spot and it also inspires and kicks those Clubs in relegation scenarios to work bloody hard those last games in avoiding the drop. AL/M can do its own thing, FA has the plans for the level under NSD, perfecto, this will in the end be the true model introducing P/R.
Love Football
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xWill the FA/APL want to promote clubs from a Foreign Heritage or background though? The problems that other cultures have, many never want to let go of and make it part of the football experience for everyone. Interesting about the concept of foreign. Celtic were founded by the Irish immigrants and were a club that helped poor folk from that background on Scotland. Sure one land is under a different flag to another, and foreigners need to settle once they cross the divide, agreed. Anglo Saxon Nations are one, same language, culture, colour, a slightly different dialect. English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, American, Australian, Canadian and New Zealand (not Maori), are the same. Its like saying you speak multiple languages, English, American, Canadian, Australian, Scottish and Welsh. Although, being from the Meditteranean, the Italian, Croatian, Greek, German, Cech and Maltese, among others, are all different to each other, and different from the Anglo background.Foreigners are like Ange's family emigrating to Australia from Europe without speaking the language, a totally foreign culture and tongue. Dude what did I say about pulling cones before you type on here? Hahahah wtf are you on about ? Hahahahahah They won't promote the effnik clubs into a league. I was given the cones by you, remember? You are effected. Hahahah c'mon "Stenson" if you are going to respond to a comment directed to Football, at least log out of your "ghost" account re. hahahahahhahahah ah re tripper. Why should that happen? You keep trolling WU you low life troll. Impress you? Who are you except for a minority and a fuckwit. You mock the business types, a Doctor Do Little, people pleaser. Not everyone likes what you like and hates what you hate. Spend more time working. You know far too much soccer tbeory or detail. Surely you don't contribute taxes through work, to society. Hahahah Any chance of a job Stensie? Can you help me contribute my taxes to society? Hahahahahahah I can make you a bowl of soup, sounds like you might be a little hangry? No not angry, ticked off earlier but I wasn't trying to rubbish anyone's view, you tend to do that man. Mate,I was only kidding about you pulling cones, relax its just a joke.... As for you saying English, Irish, Welsh, Scottish, Americans, Canadians are all the same....... seriously?
|
|
|
AyyLeague
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 423,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xFound it pretty cool that a small club in Scotland called Queens Park have recently gone from being a completely amateur side (literally couldn't sign players to a paid contract) to a semi pro outfit and they've now won back to back promotions and will be in Scotland's second tier next season. I like the way the Scottish pyramid works, top of the table automatically promoted. 2-4 enter a play off as well as second bottom from the league above. Provides plenty of tension over two legged ties and keeps things very entertaining and mitigates dead rubbers in all divisions. That happens in a few leagues around the world and I also like it as a system :) ... Scottish football is the very last example Football Australia will look to emulate though mate, after all they just crowned an "effnik sokkah club" Champions of Scotland with fans waving Irish flags and chanting in a foreign language and all...... we cant have that here, think of all the offended NRL and AFL bogans, not to mention the "ethnically pure Australian" football supporters...... +x:w00t::laugh: Hey long time between the efffnicks probs they bring up, what about the RBB/Cove/MV's etcetc and the rest of the latter "ethnically pure Australian" football supporters...... Look what they did to them - seems to be what comes around goes around in this so called sports mad country re socckah but as long as its boganville gayfl/nrl/aru we accpet it lol.....
tsf as mentions, our best asset is P/R period full stop over the bogan codes as long as its structured right but fat chance with the current APLM coming to party in years ahead. Roll on NSD.
So what happens when an efnik club wins the Australia Cup? I know it isn't as big as the other titles but it still counts. With only 2 foreign player spots allowed, a player points system restricting recruitment and playing finals,out of season.... its never gonna happen. The only effnik club in with a chance is Wellington but they are the good kind of wogsies because they don't speak with a funny accent., have foreign symbols on their kits or even foreign languages....... do they? Give it time and it will. Plus, I don't people would like the idea of a Kiwi club winning the Australia Cup though (there's a Maori inscription on their logo btw).
|
|
|
Stenson
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 215,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xWill the FA/APL want to promote clubs from a Foreign Heritage or background though? The problems that other cultures have, many never want to let go of and make it part of the football experience for everyone. Interesting about the concept of foreign. Celtic were founded by the Irish immigrants and were a club that helped poor folk from that background on Scotland. Sure one land is under a different flag to another, and foreigners need to settle once they cross the divide, agreed. Anglo Saxon Nations are one, same language, culture, colour, a slightly different dialect. English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, American, Australian, Canadian and New Zealand (not Maori), are the same. Its like saying you speak multiple languages, English, American, Canadian, Australian, Scottish and Welsh. Although, being from the Meditteranean, the Italian, Croatian, Greek, German, Cech and Maltese, among others, are all different to each other, and different from the Anglo background.Foreigners are like Ange's family emigrating to Australia from Europe without speaking the language, a totally foreign culture and tongue. Dude what did I say about pulling cones before you type on here? Hahahah wtf are you on about ? Hahahahahah They won't promote the effnik clubs into a league. I was given the cones by you, remember? You are effected. Hahahah c'mon "Stenson" if you are going to respond to a comment directed to Football, at least log out of your "ghost" account re. hahahahahhahahah ah re tripper. Why should that happen? You keep trolling WU you low life troll. Impress you? Who are you except for a minority and a fuckwit. You mock the business types, a Doctor Do Little, people pleaser. Not everyone likes what you like and hates what you hate. Spend more time working. You know far too much soccer tbeory or detail. Surely you don't contribute taxes through work, to society. Hahahah Any chance of a job Stensie? Can you help me contribute my taxes to society? Hahahahahahah I can make you a bowl of soup, sounds like you might be a little hangry? No not angry, ticked off earlier but I wasn't trying to rubbish anyone's view, you tend to do that man.
|
|
|
Butler99
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xP & R will never work in Australia. It would scare away the major stakeholders being the club owners - how would you put this to them ‘Thanks for financing your team over the years particularly through Covid but if your team finishes last - your out of the league and will be replaced by a state team that probably will have 500 fans’ It would have every owner running from the game and thus no A-League. This would bring about all the major sponsors leaving as well - they are not going to put money into the game where there are no major financial controls. There is also the issue after a few seasons of P & R Perth , Adelaide and Brisbane being relegated and replaced by teams from NSW & VIC thus becoming a South East League - as an example Which ever way you spin it entire cities/states will have no team… There's a simple way to avoid relegation: don't finish last. Or if you do, make sure your team's good enough that it can bounce back to the top flight the following season. As the A-League expands to 14 and then 16 teams P/R becomes more and more of a necessity. There are only going to be so many clubs who can genuinely make a title challenge. Halfway through the season most of the league already knows they're out of the running, and this will be even more the case when there are 14-16 teams. Relegation will actually give teams in the bottom half something to play for. And why would Perth or Brisbane be worse than the fourth or fifth best Sydney/Melbourne team. They have the population to support top flight clubs and would probably be able to avoid relegation when something is actually on the line. It's more the Central Coasts and Wellingtons (or expansion sides like Canberra, Wollongong, Gold Coast, etc.) who will be the most likely candidates for relegation. The league would easily be able to survive that. Is it a little hypocritical wanting traditional promotion/relegation and then also asking for modern "expansion" sides as opposed to promoted NPL clubs?? Do these expansion sides get a free ride into the NSD or do they start at the bottom of the pyramid in their state comps??
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIn the very early years of organised football in England the southern clubs wanted to join in competition with the northern clubs. It was decided that the best clubs, mostly from the north, would play in one league while the remaining clubs would play in a second league. Right from the start the opportunity was created for clubs to be promoted to the first league. Promotion was not automatic and neither was it decided only by performance. The basic principle driving what quickly became P/R was fairness of opportunity to the clubs in the lower league(s). P/R spread from England right across the football world. About 140 years later, because the process was being rorted by unprincipled clubs, FIFA included in its statutes the section on P/R which ensures that where P/R exists it has to be done in a fair way. P/R was and still is about fairness, fairness of opportunity and fairness of process. It is in those terms that we should be considering if, where and how P/R should exist in our football ecosystem. My personal view is that there are three priorities for football. Firstly we need to grow the base level of junior, youth and senior football right across the country. Secondly we need to improve the scouting and player development systems so that talented players move from the base into the competitive community clubs and on to the elite arm of football. Thirdly we need to expand the elite football structure by expanding the ALM and starting the NSD. Those three things will see constant growth in the quality of players and clubs across all levels of the game. A fourth priority is the transfer system but I have left that out because Football Australia has already got that going.
Compared to the three priorities above I don't see P/R having a significant role in improving the quality of football but that doesn't mean that I don't support it. Simply on the basis of aspirational clubs having the opportunity to try to prove themselves at a higher level we should move to P/R at an appropriate time. At the moment with the cost gaps between running ALM, NSD and NPL clubs being much greater than any possible central funding available I don't see P/R as viable. I'd like to see the NSD clubs grow their revenue from the planned $3m+ closer to the current $10m minimum to run an ALM club so that a promoted club has a chance to be competitive before starting up the promotion side of P/R. Hopefully, the NSD will be able to stabilise and start to grow its revenue fairly quickly. As well as central revenue growing individual clubs will grow their revenue at different rates so some aspirational clubs might be ready for promotion sooner than later. I think it will be a suck it and see situation for joining the ALM via promotion. Gyfox, well said and I agree with pretty much all 3 points. Pro/Rel in and of itself is not the cure all and I agree that a degree of for-site needs to go into the predicted revenue capacity of eligible clubs. I think 10 million is reaching for the moon rather than being practical. The longer it takes to implement, the bigger the disparity hence mine, and others, urgency around it... In 10 years time any club outside the Aleague "tent" simply wont have the ability to join a national second tier let alone the fabled pro rel with Aleague..... Aspiration is being choked out of these clubs at a steady pace... enough already.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xWill the FA/APL want to promote clubs from a Foreign Heritage or background though? The problems that other cultures have, many never want to let go of and make it part of the football experience for everyone. Interesting about the concept of foreign. Celtic were founded by the Irish immigrants and were a club that helped poor folk from that background on Scotland. Sure one land is under a different flag to another, and foreigners need to settle once they cross the divide, agreed. Anglo Saxon Nations are one, same language, culture, colour, a slightly different dialect. English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, American, Australian, Canadian and New Zealand (not Maori), are the same. Its like saying you speak multiple languages, English, American, Canadian, Australian, Scottish and Welsh. Although, being from the Meditteranean, the Italian, Croatian, Greek, German, Cech and Maltese, among others, are all different to each other, and different from the Anglo background.Foreigners are like Ange's family emigrating to Australia from Europe without speaking the language, a totally foreign culture and tongue. Dude what did I say about pulling cones before you type on here? Hahahah wtf are you on about ? Hahahahahah They won't promote the effnik clubs into a league. I was given the cones by you, remember? You are effected. Hahahah c'mon "Stenson" if you are going to respond to a comment directed to Football, at least log out of your "ghost" account re. hahahahahhahahah ah re tripper. Why should that happen? You keep trolling WU you low life troll. Impress you? Who are you except for a minority and a fuckwit. You mock the business types, a Doctor Do Little, people pleaser. Not everyone likes what you like and hates what you hate. Spend more time working. You know far too much soccer tbeory or detail. Surely you don't contribute taxes through work, to society. Hahahah Any chance of a job Stensie? Can you help me contribute my taxes to society? Hahahahahahah I can make you a bowl of soup, sounds like you might be a little hangry?
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+xP & R will never work in Australia. It would scare away the major stakeholders being the club owners - how would you put this to them ‘Thanks for financing your team over the years particularly through Covid but if your team finishes last - your out of the league and will be replaced by a state team that probably will have 500 fans’ It would have every owner running from the game and thus no A-League. This would bring about all the major sponsors leaving as well - they are not going to put money into the game where there are no major financial controls. There is also the issue after a few seasons of P & R Perth , Adelaide and Brisbane being relegated and replaced by teams from NSW & VIC thus becoming a South East League - as an example Which ever way you spin it entire cities/states will have no team… Did you ever consider that there are thousands of clubs around Aus that would get investment and increased interest, not to mention additional resources for that dream that is tangible of joining the big league. How would major sponsors leave? The most popular sport in the country dishing up stories and engaging with the whole community at an unprecedented level. The sponsors would be lining up. Let's face it - they've already left! I would genuinely be crying with happiness if my local club ever had the chance to be on a big stage. Let's face it - I follow the a-league and I do like it, but it is mostly boring as batshit. I have not watched one whole entire match all season that didnt have MV. I don't even look at the scores hardly of other's matches.
|
|
|