Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
I think it is time to ban the Roman Catholic Church. It is a corrupt, money making business which fronts itself as a religion, but just exploits those who are conned into having faith in its fake religion. It is a haven for child molesters and will continue to attract them with its rule that priests must be celibate.
|
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
So we live in North Korea now?
What gives you the right to want to ban any group and where can we draw the line once this dangerous precedence against freedom and democracy is set?
Good luck with that one! Might as well do an about face, walk up to a wall, and start headbutting it. Takes some photos and post them here for our amusement please.
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSo we live in North Korea now? What gives you the right to want to ban any group and where can we draw the line once this dangerous precedence against freedom and democracy is set? Good luck with that one! Might as well do an about face, walk up to a wall, and start headbutting it. Takes some photos and post them here for our amusement please. Of course it is not going to happen but lots of things that should happen are never going to happen. Why should a organisation which makes money by fraud be allowed to exist? Why should a organisation which employees paedophiles and allows them molest children be allowed to exist?
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Lot's of things should happen hey!
No problem Adolf!
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xLot's of things should happen hey! No problem Adolf! The world is a better place that you are probably a loser on the fringes living in Mummies little basement eating ice-cream! By Adolf do you mean the Pope supported Adolf Hitler?
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xLot's of things should happen hey! No problem Adolf! The world is a better place that you are probably a loser on the fringes living in Mummies little basement eating ice-cream! By Adolf do you mean the Pope supported Adolf Hitler? No! I mean you and Adolf are the same. You are advocating after all the for the banning of a religious institution that is adhered to by about 1 billion followers globally. What makes you think it is ok for you to insinuate such stupidity against the rights of so many people? Persecution of Jews, now persecution of Roman Catholics.
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xLot's of things should happen hey! No problem Adolf! The world is a better place that you are probably a loser on the fringes living in Mummies little basement eating ice-cream! By Adolf do you mean the Pope supported Adolf Hitler? No! I mean you and Adolf are the same. You are advocating after all the for the banning of a religious institution that is adhered to by about 1 billion followers globally. What makes you think it is ok for you to insinuate such stupidity against the rights of so many people? Persecution of Jews, now persecution of Roman Catholics. The Pope was a friend of the NAZI's and Adolf Hitler, he supported the persecution of the Jews and you have the cheek to say I am like Hitler. You really have lost the plot and have no clue about anything.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xLot's of things should happen hey! No problem Adolf! The world is a better place that you are probably a loser on the fringes living in Mummies little basement eating ice-cream! By Adolf do you mean the Pope supported Adolf Hitler? No! I mean you and Adolf are the same. You are advocating after all the for the banning of a religious institution that is adhered to by about 1 billion followers globally. What makes you think it is ok for you to insinuate such stupidity against the rights of so many people? Persecution of Jews, now persecution of Roman Catholics. The Pope was a friend of the NAZI's and Adolf Hitler, he supported the persecution of the Jews and you have the cheek to say I am like Hitler. You really have lost the plot and have no clue about anything. Was he? And what about all the Catholic Resistance Fighters in France and elsewhere. And what about Saint Mary of Paris who was a Catholic Nun, and who converted to Orthodoxy and lied to the Germans saying she was a particular Jew so that the real one who was a Mother of 4 survived. She ended up at Auschwitz and in the Gas Chamber but was canonized as a Saint.
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xLot's of things should happen hey! No problem Adolf! The world is a better place that you are probably a loser on the fringes living in Mummies little basement eating ice-cream! By Adolf do you mean the Pope supported Adolf Hitler? No! I mean you and Adolf are the same. You are advocating after all the for the banning of a religious institution that is adhered to by about 1 billion followers globally. What makes you think it is ok for you to insinuate such stupidity against the rights of so many people? Persecution of Jews, now persecution of Roman Catholics. The Pope was a friend of the NAZI's and Adolf Hitler, he supported the persecution of the Jews and you have the cheek to say I am like Hitler. You really have lost the plot and have no clue about anything. Correct. Stalin or Mao is probably more like it. Shit troll btw. You know exactly what you are doing.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
I don't agree with monf most of the times. But he is correct. You can't bam the Catholic church and ignore every other organisation that has predators.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI don't agree with monf most of the times. But he is correct. You can't bam the Catholic church and ignore every other organisation that has predators. You can't ban any organization or associate an organization just because they had individuals who allegedly sexually harassed or molested vulnerable children. Otherwise might as well ban all Education Departments around the country as well. The vast majority of the Catholic Church does not condone this behaviour and are of course disgusted. And you can't persecute an organization that is so important to about 30% of Australians and plays an important role in Australia's Irish roots.
|
|
|
Captain Haddock
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
I think it is time to ban Islam from Australia. It is a corrupt, totalitarian extremist political ideology which fronts itself as a religion, but just exploits those who are conned into having faith in its fake religion. It is a haven for paedophilia, homobhobia, anti-semitism and actual misogyny and will continue to attract people with such views with its' rigid doctrines. ^ Imagine the outrage from the same types of people going "Ban the Catholic church and seize its' assets!" if you went around saying this...
There are only two intellectually honest debate tactics: (a) pointing out errors or omissions in your opponent’s facts, or (b) pointing out errors or omissions in your opponent’s logic. All other debate tactics are intellectually dishonest - John T. Reed
The Most Popular Presidential Candidate Of All Time (TM) cant go to a sports stadium in the country he presides over. Figure that one out...
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI think it is time to ban Islam from Australia. It is a corrupt, totalitarian extremist political ideology which fronts itself as a religion, but just exploits those who are conned into having faith in its fake religion. It is a haven for paedophilia, homobhobia, anti-semitism and actual misogyny and will continue to attract people with such views with its' rigid doctrines. ^ Imagine the outrage from the same types of people going "Ban the Catholic church and seize its' assets!" if you went around saying this... That sounds like most religions tbh. You have to treat all religions the same. You either allow them all or you ban them all (which is anti-freedom and would nearly be impossible to enforce). You can't pick and choose and ban the ones you don't like and keep the ones you do like.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI think it is time to ban Islam from Australia. It is a corrupt, totalitarian extremist political ideology which fronts itself as a religion, but just exploits those who are conned into having faith in its fake religion. It is a haven for paedophilia, homobhobia, anti-semitism and actual misogyny and will continue to attract people with such views with its' rigid doctrines. ^ Imagine the outrage from the same types of people going "Ban the Catholic church and seize its' assets!" if you went around saying this... That sounds like most religions tbh. You have to treat all religions the same. You either allow them all or you ban them all (which is anti-freedom and would nearly be impossible to enforce). You can't pick and choose and ban the ones you don't like and keep the ones you do like. So let's get back to banning Catholicism then and Islam! We are waiting! How would you like to live in a country that bans your religion? How bad would that be? Won't they just go underground anyway? My religion was underground for the first 4 Centuries and from the 15th Century till the 20th century as we dodge mass genocides against our people. We are still around! Why not ban the Cat's association? How about banning the Dogs association as well for crapping on the sidewalks (Disgusting stuff)? How about we ban Conservative commentators as well for being against same sex marriage, abortion, and just for disagreeing with you. How about we ban you from this forum for having a low IQ! After all, we are all dumber now for reading your posts!
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI think it is time to ban Islam from Australia. It is a corrupt, totalitarian extremist political ideology which fronts itself as a religion, but just exploits those who are conned into having faith in its fake religion. It is a haven for paedophilia, homobhobia, anti-semitism and actual misogyny and will continue to attract people with such views with its' rigid doctrines. ^ Imagine the outrage from the same types of people going "Ban the Catholic church and seize its' assets!" if you went around saying this... That sounds like most religions tbh. You have to treat all religions the same. You either allow them all or you ban them all (which is anti-freedom and would nearly be impossible to enforce). You can't pick and choose and ban the ones you don't like and keep the ones you do like. So let's get back to banning Catholicism then and Islam! We are waiting! How would you like to live in a country that bans your religion? How bad would that be? Won't they just go underground anyway? My religion was underground for the first 4 Centuries and from the 15th Century till the 20th century as we dodge mass genocides against our people. We are still around! Why not ban the Cat's association? How about banning the Dogs association as well for crapping on the sidewalks (Disgusting stuff)? How about we ban Conservative commentators as well for being against same sex marriage, abortion, and just for disagreeing with you. How about we ban you from this forum for having a low IQ! After all, we are all dumber now for reading your posts! What?????? I have no idea what your point is but I think you completely misread what I said. I said you have to treat all religions the same. Either allow them all to exist or ban them all which would be nearly impossible to do and I think banning religion would be a compete waste of time and resources.
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
I am not saying ban the religion of Roman Catholicism, I am saying ban the corrupt organisation behind it which has little to do with religion but is just a corrupt money making business which has accrued. Everyone is free to believe whatever religion they want but money making faith exploiting businesses should be banned.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
The organisation is the religion. There really isn’t anything else. There is the organisational structure of the Church and its adherence. The sacraments are bestowed by the Pope for the Catholic Church and by the the Patriarch of Constantinople and Jerusalem for the Orthodox Tradition.
You can’t practice the sacraments without the authority of the Patriarchate (which was given to him by The Holy Spirit). If you do, it is unofficial and schismatic. The Orthodox Tradition has Apostolic Ascension from the Apostles. The Catholics also claim to have this but they split from the main body during The Great Schism of 1054 resulting in Orthodoxy having the only connection to the Apostles and Jesus Christ but the Catholics disagree with this saying they still have Apostolic Ascension.
It’s like Royalty. Jesus Christ being the true King and the Pope His representative for the Catholics and the Patriarchate for the Orthodox.
You can’t remove the “organisation” or ban it and get rid of it. Or say it is a money making enterprise. They have title to all the Churches globally and hence do have a lot of money which was raised through its adherence and hence belongs to the body or the Church for its various activities which also include massive charity.
It will always remain to the end of times. Or until the next coming of Christ and judgement!
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
The prophecy also states that before the next coming, the 2 Churches (Catholic and Orthodox) will re-unite by The Power of the Holy Spirit.
The Church is much larger than Pell, the Pope or any Government on earth.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
What beautiful revisionist stories to suit your own fascist agenda. Fuck off mouth breather.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI think it is time to ban the Roman Catholic Church. It is a corrupt, money making business which fronts itself as a religion, but just exploits those who are conned into having faith in its fake religion. It is a haven for child molesters and will continue to attract them with its rule that priests must be celibate. Not that it'll ever happen because it's a stupid idea, however I'm just curious to know if you had it your way would you ban the Roman Catholic church or the whole religion, so basically every single Christian religion out there?
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
I'd like to see all religions die out. But seeing they won't anytime soon they should, at the very least, do away with their tax free status.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI'd like to see all religions die out. But seeing they won't anytime soon they should, at the very least, do away with their tax free status. If the religions stopped funding Private Hospitals, aged care and respite centers, schools, and Early Learning Centers, the Australian Education system, Health System, Child Care, and Aged Care would be up shit creek even more than it is already. Therefore, don't bet on it because the vast majority of their Activities go to funding community projects for the wider community to use and they give a lot to charity as well. So won't happen.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI'd like to see all religions die out. But seeing they won't anytime soon they should, at the very least, do away with their tax free status. If the religions stopped funding Private Hospitals, aged care and respite centers, schools, and Early Learning Centers, the Australian Education system, Health System, Child Care, and Aged Care would be up shit creek even more than it is already. Therefore, don't bet on it because the vast majority of their Activities go to funding community projects for the wider community to use and they give a lot to charity as well. So won't happen. Uh huh...And in progressive secular countries like Norway, Sweden and Denmark etc none of those things are even an issue.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI'd like to see all religions die out. But seeing they won't anytime soon they should, at the very least, do away with their tax free status. If the religions stopped funding Private Hospitals, aged care and respite centers, schools, and Early Learning Centers, the Australian Education system, Health System, Child Care, and Aged Care would be up shit creek even more than it is already. Therefore, don't bet on it because the vast majority of their Activities go to funding community projects for the wider community to use and they give a lot to charity as well. So won't happen. Uh huh...And in progressive secular countries like Norway, Sweden and Denmark etc none of those things are even an issue. Those countries do not tax religions either. Religions are tax exempt because they are non-profit organizations. What they make is all invested in creating more infrastructure such as Private Schools, Hospitals, Medical Centers, Respite Centers, Aged Care Facilities, Child Care Centers and Early Learning Centers and also shelters for the homeless and battered or abused women. Other money goes to the administrative running of these facilities, wages and maintenance and also to charitable Organizations such as Salvation Army etc. You can't tax such an organization, and even if you did it would be fruitless because they won't show any profit anyway and hence will not pay tax other than GST when they buy or pay for services which they are not exempt from. They would just send money to the administrative arms of the Vatican or Patriarchate. Here is another thing many of you imbeciles are ignoring. Religions such as the Catholic Church and others are responsible for so many great things in this country when you consider their contributions to society. No other organizations contribute anywhere near as much as these religions do. So, your little crusade is fruitless and self defeating too.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xI'd like to see all religions die out. But seeing they won't anytime soon they should, at the very least, do away with their tax free status. If the religions stopped funding Private Hospitals, aged care and respite centers, schools, and Early Learning Centers, the Australian Education system, Health System, Child Care, and Aged Care would be up shit creek even more than it is already. Therefore, don't bet on it because the vast majority of their Activities go to funding community projects for the wider community to use and they give a lot to charity as well. So won't happen. Uh huh...And in progressive secular countries like Norway, Sweden and Denmark etc none of those things are even an issue. Those countries do not tax religions either. Religions are tax exempt because they are non-profit organizations. What they make is all invested in creating more infrastructure such as Private Schools, Hospitals, Medical Centers, Respite Centers, Aged Care Facilities, Child Care Centers and Early Learning Centers and also shelters for the homeless and battered or abused women. Other money goes to the administrative running of these facilities, wages and maintenance and also to charitable Organizations such as Salvation Army etc. You can't tax such an organization, and even if you did it would be fruitless because they won't show any profit anyway and hence will not pay tax other than GST when they buy or pay for services which they are not exempt from. They would just send money to the administrative arms of the Vatican or Patriarchate. Here is another thing many of you imbeciles are ignoring. Religions such as the Catholic Church and others are responsible for so many great things in this country when you consider their contributions to society. No other organizations contribute anywhere near as much as these religions do. So, your little crusade is fruitless and self defeating too. They contribute all right. Contribute to the the abuse suffered by 10's of thousands of children in their care over decades if not centuries resulting in broken homes, wrecked families and marriages, suicides and dysfunctional relationships. Not to mention the pyschological trauma inflicted on women who would 'burn in hell' should they get a divorce or wanted to use contraception or weren't 'chaste' or had a child out of wedlock. How many ruined people have wasted their lives worrying in fear over the consequences of some bunch of bullshit written by desert dwelling arabs thousands of years ago? Fuck off with your sanctimonious bullshit about all the 'good' they do. If the church stopped existing tomorrow other organisations would fill the gaps left over without a doubt and the world would be better for it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cases_by_countryEven poor bloody nuns. http://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-headed-for-another-sex-abuse-scandal-as-nunstoo-speak-up-111539 https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/religion-and-beliefs/the-irish-woman-who-exposed-abuse-of-nuns-by-priests-25-years-ago-1.3788555And before you crap on about picking on the Catholic Church I am 100% positive that this sort of thing happens across most, if not all, religions. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/apr/25/middle-east-child-abuse-pederastyFilthy scum.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xI'd like to see all religions die out. But seeing they won't anytime soon they should, at the very least, do away with their tax free status. If the religions stopped funding Private Hospitals, aged care and respite centers, schools, and Early Learning Centers, the Australian Education system, Health System, Child Care, and Aged Care would be up shit creek even more than it is already. Therefore, don't bet on it because the vast majority of their Activities go to funding community projects for the wider community to use and they give a lot to charity as well. So won't happen. Uh huh...And in progressive secular countries like Norway, Sweden and Denmark etc none of those things are even an issue. Those countries do not tax religions either. Religions are tax exempt because they are non-profit organizations. What they make is all invested in creating more infrastructure such as Private Schools, Hospitals, Medical Centers, Respite Centers, Aged Care Facilities, Child Care Centers and Early Learning Centers and also shelters for the homeless and battered or abused women. Other money goes to the administrative running of these facilities, wages and maintenance and also to charitable Organizations such as Salvation Army etc. You can't tax such an organization, and even if you did it would be fruitless because they won't show any profit anyway and hence will not pay tax other than GST when they buy or pay for services which they are not exempt from. They would just send money to the administrative arms of the Vatican or Patriarchate. Here is another thing many of you imbeciles are ignoring. Religions such as the Catholic Church and others are responsible for so many great things in this country when you consider their contributions to society. No other organizations contribute anywhere near as much as these religions do. So, your little crusade is fruitless and self defeating too. They contribute all right. Contribute to the the abuse suffered by 10's of thousands of children in their care over decades if not centuries resulting in broken homes, wrecked families and marriages, suicides and dysfunctional relationships. Not to mention the pyschological trauma inflicted on women who would 'burn in hell' should they get a divorce or wanted to use contraception or weren't 'chaste' or had a child out of wedlock. How many ruined people have wasted their lives worrying in fear over the consequences of some bunch of bullshit written by desert dwelling arabs thousands of years ago? Fuck off with your sanctimonious bullshit about all the 'good' they do. If the church stopped existing tomorrow other organisations would fill the gaps left over without a doubt and the world would be better for it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cases_by_countryEven poor bloody nuns. http://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-headed-for-another-sex-abuse-scandal-as-nunstoo-speak-up-111539 https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/religion-and-beliefs/the-irish-woman-who-exposed-abuse-of-nuns-by-priests-25-years-ago-1.3788555And before you crap on about picking on the Catholic Church I am 100% positive that this sort of thing happens across most, if not all, religions. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/apr/25/middle-east-child-abuse-pederastyFilthy scum. Contribute to the suffering of 10,000s of people. Are you serious. The reverse is true. The Catholic Church and other religions offer thousands of hospital beds, educate hundreds of thousands of Primary and Seconday School students, look after thousands in Child Care Centers and Early Learning Centers, look after thousands of elderly and shelter hundreds of homeless and abused and make thousands of meals for the needy every day. One more thing. I am not at all convinced that Pell is guilty. He is a scapegoat. If he was a Pedophile, there would be dozens of victims over a prolonged period and not just 2 Choir Boys which could be fabricated. He was found guilty on hearsay and an early jury found him innocent 10 to 2. Something isn't right here. I am not saying he can't be guilty. Clearly he could, but that is not something to hold against an entire religion. It is George Pell on rial, not Catholicism or Christianity in general.
|
|
|
localstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI think it is time to ban the Roman Catholic Church. It is a corrupt, money making business which fronts itself as a religion, but just exploits those who are conned into having faith in its fake religion. It is a haven for child molesters and will continue to attract them with its rule that priests must be celibate. Sounds just like scientology (apart from priests must be celibate!)
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
The Catholic Church does much good as well, much more good than it does bad. Shame the media only reports the juicy scandals.
Even if you don’t like the church, the idea that you can just throw the ban stick at it is complete fucking madness, yet a distinct possibility.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Guys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I agree with you and rusty 100% but like I said there's no point with Muz. He had his mind set on one thing which is fine, but then expects us all to think like he does which isn't fine. Best thing you can do is not give a shit about his pathetic biased opinions. Trust me don't even waste your time mate.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I agree with you and rusty 100% but like I said there's no point with Muz. He had his mind set on one thing which is fine, but then expects us all to think like he does which isn't fine. Best thing you can do is not give a shit about his pathetic biased opinions. Trust me don't even waste your time mate. I think you might be right. A good solution is to not pay any attention to him and give him a platform for his intolerance towards religion.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I agree with you and rusty 100% but like I said there's no point with Muz. He had his mind set on one thing which is fine, but then expects us all to think like he does which isn't fine. Best thing you can do is not give a shit about his pathetic biased opinions. Trust me don't even waste your time mate. I think you might be right. A good solution is to not pay any attention to him and give him a platform for his intolerance towards religion. Yeah better to deny and cover up institutional abuse. Well , if you're ok with that.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people.
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. oof https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. oof https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition Unbelievable! You are equating the 15th Century to now when everyone thought the earth was flat. LOL you guys are so stupid! Secondly, it's not the religion itself that is corrupt. It's the man within the religion. The religion itself is still full of wonderful people, who are God Fearing and donate their time to help others in need. They do this altruistically without wanting any reward or recognition. The Orthodox Religion was for a long time a persecuted tradition. We were the Christians that were thrown to the Lions and lived throughout the Middle East suffering Islamic invasion after invasion and genocide. But we survive and follow the word of Christ even if it costs us our lives because we know there is no bigger reward than to be a Martyr for the Lord. In our religion, Martyrdom in the Lord's name is pretty much automatic sainthood. Myracles occur in your name and you are canonized. We do have a Martyrs Day that celebrates them all. And they are automatically in paradise. This is why Mary of Egypt took the place of a Jewish Mother of 3, was sent to the Gas Chambers in Auschwitz and died. This is how those that were thrown to the lions in the Colosseum, walked into the arena with smiles, including children. They were given this strength to do this by the Holy Spirit that came down to them as they were dismembered and eaten. Angels were watching and crying and also celebrating because the Kingdom of God inherited their souls. This is what faith is all about. It's about understanding that there is a higher power and authority. That we must try to be good people and love others. That we must help others and be humble. That we must look to the Lord and try and be like Him. Some of you mock this right now. But some of you will discover how wrong you are later in life hopefully and find your way. We pray that you do. When you do, you become more confident and powerful because you are given more strength by you know who. The Holy Spirit. The part of the trinity that comes to earth from the Father.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. "dog, flop, bitch'. Triggered much Rob? All because I called out your misogyny in a matildas thread. Look at you go. Your ramblings are a prime example of an ad hominen attack. (You might need to google that.)
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. "dog, flop, bitch'. Triggered much Rob? All because I called out your misogyny in a matildas thread. Look at you go. Your ramblings are a prime example of an ad hominen attack. (You might need to google that.) I could call you worse names, like I said you hate all Christians and you know it. And again there's nothing mosogyny about saying a men's kit from the past was ugly, and the current female kit based off that same ugly kit is still in fact ugly. You're that far up yourself you couldn't even apologize for being wrong. There's absolutely nothing wrong with me not being interested in watching woman's football. You would have had a case if I was against watching any female sport but unfortunately for you I actually do watch UFC as one example and enjoy it just as much as many of the men's fights. Again even with that in mind you won't admit you jumped the gun and completely rocked yourself. Like I said you're too up yourself to apologize which is one of the reasons you're a piece of shit, dog, flop, but yeh most of all just a whinging bitch. As for hominem attack well you got that right I don't know what it means and believe me I wouldn't spend a second looking it up because I couldn't care less and wouldn't use that word in future anyways 😂 Anyways good luck like with your hate for Christians, regardless of what denomination they are from.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. "dog, flop, bitch'. Triggered much Rob? All because I called out your misogyny in a matildas thread. Look at you go. Your ramblings are a prime example of an ad hominen attack. (You might need to google that.) I could call you worse names, like I said you hate all Christians and you know it. And again there's nothing mosogyny about saying a men's kit from the past was ugly, and the current female kit based off that same ugly kit is still in fact ugly. You're that far up yourself you couldn't even apologize for being wrong. There's absolutely nothing wrong with me not being interested in watching woman's football. You would have had a case if I was against watching any female sport but unfortunately for you I actually do watch UFC as one example and enjoy it just as much as many of the men's fights. Again even with that in mind you won't admit you jumped the gun and completely rocked yourself. Like I said you're too up yourself to apologize which is one of the reasons you're a piece of shit, dog, flop, but yeh most of all just a whinging bitch. As for hominem attack well you got that right I don't know what it means and believe me I wouldn't spend a second looking it up because I couldn't care less and wouldn't use that word in future anyways 😂 Anyways good luck like with your hate for Christians, regardless of what denomination they are from. Again, because comprehension is obviously something you're not well versed in, you implied that anyone liking that kit was a fraud or disingenuous or a virtue signaller based on your wrong assumption that everyone hated the first one. You've got past form ragging on women's football. Good for you, you don't like it or women's football and that's fine by me. What I objected to you was your implication that because it was a women's kit that was the only reason people were rating it. So mate if you can't separate out the difference in your head between what you think I said and what I actually said then that's a problem with you, not me. As for Christians, or Muslims or Calathumpians you can believe what you want to believe but don't try and pretend they haven't all been guilty of grave abuses now and in the past like mouflon/aikhme is trying to. He can't even acknowledge that these things have happened. What does that tell you about the intellectual honesty of his arguments?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. "dog, flop, bitch'. Triggered much Rob? All because I called out your misogyny in a matildas thread. Look at you go. Your ramblings are a prime example of an ad hominen attack. (You might need to google that.) I could call you worse names, like I said you hate all Christians and you know it. And again there's nothing mosogyny about saying a men's kit from the past was ugly, and the current female kit based off that same ugly kit is still in fact ugly. You're that far up yourself you couldn't even apologize for being wrong. There's absolutely nothing wrong with me not being interested in watching woman's football. You would have had a case if I was against watching any female sport but unfortunately for you I actually do watch UFC as one example and enjoy it just as much as many of the men's fights. Again even with that in mind you won't admit you jumped the gun and completely rocked yourself. Like I said you're too up yourself to apologize which is one of the reasons you're a piece of shit, dog, flop, but yeh most of all just a whinging bitch. As for hominem attack well you got that right I don't know what it means and believe me I wouldn't spend a second looking it up because I couldn't care less and wouldn't use that word in future anyways 😂 Anyways good luck like with your hate for Christians, regardless of what denomination they are from. Again, because comprehension is obviously something you're not well versed in, you implied that anyone liking that kit was a fraud or disingenuous or a virtue signaller based on your wrong assumption that everyone hated the first one. You've got past form ragging on women's football. Good for you, you don't like it or women's football and that's fine by me. What I objected to you was your implication that because it was a women's kit that was the only reason people were rating it. So mate if you can't separate out the difference in your head between what you think I said and what I actually said then that's a problem with you, not me. As for Christians, or Muslims or Calathumpians you can believe what you want to believe but don't try and pretend they haven't all been guilty of grave abuses now and in the past like mouflon/aikhme is trying to. He can't even acknowledge that these things have happened. What does that tell you about the intellectual honesty of his arguments? It's funny how you claim comprehension is something I'm not well versed in. I didn't imply everyone hated the old kit I'm talking about majority. There is a reason why that kit was labeled the spew kit. Wake the fuck up and realise the obvious that it was voted by majority as being one of the worst regardless of your fucking opinion. So based on that all I said was that it's funny how it was ugly then, yet a great kit today as a female kit. If ugly for the men then it's ugly for the woman too. And then my next comment about not being too fussed about it was the simple fact that unlike the Men's world cup where I buy the kits I'm not to fussed about the woman's world cup because I'm not into it. So which ever way you look at it in your fucked up delusional mind there's nothing mysogonist in my comments. Then you say I have past form ragging about woman's football. This is why I have zero respect for dickheads like you. I've never talked shit about woman's football yet you make up a lie. You're seriously delusional. I don't even remember commenting on woman's football to begin with. Just because I don't watch it that doesn't mean I have to hate it or be against it. Now as for Christians I simply told the others not to waste their time on you because you're one thick human who won't admit anything so why bother. Basically I'm saying you hate Christians, so why on earth even pretend you don't? What benefit is there in that? Be a fucking man and admit it, judged by every single previous post of yours it's pretty fucking clear you hate God and don't believe in God so again where am I wrong there in saying that you hate the idea of religion, and Christianity above all? Am I wrong there? But as I said you still won't apologise for clearly being in the wrong, and you're that delusional that you'll make up lies and put words in my mouth about certain matters even when all I'm commenting on is football. And I'm supposed to respect you? Fuck off!
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. "dog, flop, bitch'. Triggered much Rob? All because I called out your misogyny in a matildas thread. Look at you go. Your ramblings are a prime example of an ad hominen attack. (You might need to google that.) I could call you worse names, like I said you hate all Christians and you know it. And again there's nothing mosogyny about saying a men's kit from the past was ugly, and the current female kit based off that same ugly kit is still in fact ugly. You're that far up yourself you couldn't even apologize for being wrong. There's absolutely nothing wrong with me not being interested in watching woman's football. You would have had a case if I was against watching any female sport but unfortunately for you I actually do watch UFC as one example and enjoy it just as much as many of the men's fights. Again even with that in mind you won't admit you jumped the gun and completely rocked yourself. Like I said you're too up yourself to apologize which is one of the reasons you're a piece of shit, dog, flop, but yeh most of all just a whinging bitch. As for hominem attack well you got that right I don't know what it means and believe me I wouldn't spend a second looking it up because I couldn't care less and wouldn't use that word in future anyways 😂 Anyways good luck like with your hate for Christians, regardless of what denomination they are from. Again, because comprehension is obviously something you're not well versed in, you implied that anyone liking that kit was a fraud or disingenuous or a virtue signaller based on your wrong assumption that everyone hated the first one. You've got past form ragging on women's football. Good for you, you don't like it or women's football and that's fine by me. What I objected to you was your implication that because it was a women's kit that was the only reason people were rating it. So mate if you can't separate out the difference in your head between what you think I said and what I actually said then that's a problem with you, not me. As for Christians, or Muslims or Calathumpians you can believe what you want to believe but don't try and pretend they haven't all been guilty of grave abuses now and in the past like mouflon/aikhme is trying to. He can't even acknowledge that these things have happened. What does that tell you about the intellectual honesty of his arguments? It's funny how you claim comprehension is something I'm not well versed in. I didn't imply everyone hated the old kit I'm talking about majority. There is a reason why that kit was labeled the spew kit. Wake the fuck up and realise the obvious that it was voted by majority as being one of the worst regardless of your fucking opinion. So based on that all I said was that it's funny how it was ugly then, yet a great kit today as a female kit. If ugly for the men then it's ugly for the woman too. And then my next comment about not being too fussed about it was the simple fact that unlike the Men's world cup where I buy the kits I'm not to fussed about the woman's world cup because I'm not into it. So which ever way you look at it in your fucked up delusional mind there's nothing mysogonist in my comments. Then you say I have past form ragging about woman's football. This is why I have zero respect for dickheads like you. I've never talked shit about woman's football yet you make up a lie. You're seriously delusional. I don't even remember commenting on woman's football to begin with. Just because I don't watch it that doesn't mean I have to hate it or be against it. Now as for Christians I simply told the others not to waste their time on you because you're one thick human who won't admit anything so why bother. Basically I'm saying you hate Christians, so why on earth even pretend you don't? What benefit is there in that? Be a fucking man and admit it, judged by every single previous post of yours it's pretty fucking clear you hate God and don't believe in God so again where am I wrong there in saying that you hate the idea of religion, and Christianity above all? Am I wrong there? But as I said you still won't apologise for clearly being in the wrong, and you're that delusional that you'll make up lies and put words in my mouth about certain matters even when all I'm commenting on is football. And I'm supposed to respect you? Fuck off!
I didn't ask for your respect champ. I'm not particularly fussed one way or the other. You're clearly triggered big time over something. Perhaps a lie down will help you calm down?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. "dog, flop, bitch'. Triggered much Rob? All because I called out your misogyny in a matildas thread. Look at you go. Your ramblings are a prime example of an ad hominen attack. (You might need to google that.) I could call you worse names, like I said you hate all Christians and you know it. And again there's nothing mosogyny about saying a men's kit from the past was ugly, and the current female kit based off that same ugly kit is still in fact ugly. You're that far up yourself you couldn't even apologize for being wrong. There's absolutely nothing wrong with me not being interested in watching woman's football. You would have had a case if I was against watching any female sport but unfortunately for you I actually do watch UFC as one example and enjoy it just as much as many of the men's fights. Again even with that in mind you won't admit you jumped the gun and completely rocked yourself. Like I said you're too up yourself to apologize which is one of the reasons you're a piece of shit, dog, flop, but yeh most of all just a whinging bitch. As for hominem attack well you got that right I don't know what it means and believe me I wouldn't spend a second looking it up because I couldn't care less and wouldn't use that word in future anyways 😂 Anyways good luck like with your hate for Christians, regardless of what denomination they are from. Again, because comprehension is obviously something you're not well versed in, you implied that anyone liking that kit was a fraud or disingenuous or a virtue signaller based on your wrong assumption that everyone hated the first one. You've got past form ragging on women's football. Good for you, you don't like it or women's football and that's fine by me. What I objected to you was your implication that because it was a women's kit that was the only reason people were rating it. So mate if you can't separate out the difference in your head between what you think I said and what I actually said then that's a problem with you, not me. As for Christians, or Muslims or Calathumpians you can believe what you want to believe but don't try and pretend they haven't all been guilty of grave abuses now and in the past like mouflon/aikhme is trying to. He can't even acknowledge that these things have happened. What does that tell you about the intellectual honesty of his arguments? It's funny how you claim comprehension is something I'm not well versed in. I didn't imply everyone hated the old kit I'm talking about majority. There is a reason why that kit was labeled the spew kit. Wake the fuck up and realise the obvious that it was voted by majority as being one of the worst regardless of your fucking opinion. So based on that all I said was that it's funny how it was ugly then, yet a great kit today as a female kit. If ugly for the men then it's ugly for the woman too. And then my next comment about not being too fussed about it was the simple fact that unlike the Men's world cup where I buy the kits I'm not to fussed about the woman's world cup because I'm not into it. So which ever way you look at it in your fucked up delusional mind there's nothing mysogonist in my comments. Then you say I have past form ragging about woman's football. This is why I have zero respect for dickheads like you. I've never talked shit about woman's football yet you make up a lie. You're seriously delusional. I don't even remember commenting on woman's football to begin with. Just because I don't watch it that doesn't mean I have to hate it or be against it. Now as for Christians I simply told the others not to waste their time on you because you're one thick human who won't admit anything so why bother. Basically I'm saying you hate Christians, so why on earth even pretend you don't? What benefit is there in that? Be a fucking man and admit it, judged by every single previous post of yours it's pretty fucking clear you hate God and don't believe in God so again where am I wrong there in saying that you hate the idea of religion, and Christianity above all? Am I wrong there? But as I said you still won't apologise for clearly being in the wrong, and you're that delusional that you'll make up lies and put words in my mouth about certain matters even when all I'm commenting on is football. And I'm supposed to respect you? Fuck off!
I didn't ask for your respect champ. I'm not particularly fussed one way or the other. You're clearly triggered big time over something. Perhaps a lie down will help you calm down? Yeh triggered just like you were when I didn't like your most beloved spew kit, great call 👍
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. "dog, flop, bitch'. Triggered much Rob? All because I called out your misogyny in a matildas thread. Look at you go. Your ramblings are a prime example of an ad hominen attack. (You might need to google that.) I could call you worse names, like I said you hate all Christians and you know it. And again there's nothing mosogyny about saying a men's kit from the past was ugly, and the current female kit based off that same ugly kit is still in fact ugly. You're that far up yourself you couldn't even apologize for being wrong. There's absolutely nothing wrong with me not being interested in watching woman's football. You would have had a case if I was against watching any female sport but unfortunately for you I actually do watch UFC as one example and enjoy it just as much as many of the men's fights. Again even with that in mind you won't admit you jumped the gun and completely rocked yourself. Like I said you're too up yourself to apologize which is one of the reasons you're a piece of shit, dog, flop, but yeh most of all just a whinging bitch. As for hominem attack well you got that right I don't know what it means and believe me I wouldn't spend a second looking it up because I couldn't care less and wouldn't use that word in future anyways 😂 Anyways good luck like with your hate for Christians, regardless of what denomination they are from. Again, because comprehension is obviously something you're not well versed in, you implied that anyone liking that kit was a fraud or disingenuous or a virtue signaller based on your wrong assumption that everyone hated the first one. You've got past form ragging on women's football. Good for you, you don't like it or women's football and that's fine by me. What I objected to you was your implication that because it was a women's kit that was the only reason people were rating it. So mate if you can't separate out the difference in your head between what you think I said and what I actually said then that's a problem with you, not me. As for Christians, or Muslims or Calathumpians you can believe what you want to believe but don't try and pretend they haven't all been guilty of grave abuses now and in the past like mouflon/aikhme is trying to. He can't even acknowledge that these things have happened. What does that tell you about the intellectual honesty of his arguments? It's funny how you claim comprehension is something I'm not well versed in. I didn't imply everyone hated the old kit I'm talking about majority. There is a reason why that kit was labeled the spew kit. Wake the fuck up and realise the obvious that it was voted by majority as being one of the worst regardless of your fucking opinion. So based on that all I said was that it's funny how it was ugly then, yet a great kit today as a female kit. If ugly for the men then it's ugly for the woman too. And then my next comment about not being too fussed about it was the simple fact that unlike the Men's world cup where I buy the kits I'm not to fussed about the woman's world cup because I'm not into it. So which ever way you look at it in your fucked up delusional mind there's nothing mysogonist in my comments. Then you say I have past form ragging about woman's football. This is why I have zero respect for dickheads like you. I've never talked shit about woman's football yet you make up a lie. You're seriously delusional. I don't even remember commenting on woman's football to begin with. Just because I don't watch it that doesn't mean I have to hate it or be against it. Now as for Christians I simply told the others not to waste their time on you because you're one thick human who won't admit anything so why bother. Basically I'm saying you hate Christians, so why on earth even pretend you don't? What benefit is there in that? Be a fucking man and admit it, judged by every single previous post of yours it's pretty fucking clear you hate God and don't believe in God so again where am I wrong there in saying that you hate the idea of religion, and Christianity above all? Am I wrong there? But as I said you still won't apologise for clearly being in the wrong, and you're that delusional that you'll make up lies and put words in my mouth about certain matters even when all I'm commenting on is football. And I'm supposed to respect you? Fuck off!
I didn't ask for your respect champ. I'm not particularly fussed one way or the other. You're clearly triggered big time over something. Perhaps a lie down will help you calm down? Yeh triggered just like you were when I didn't like your most beloved spew kit, great call 👍 👍
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Just so I understand this masterclass in logical reasoning:
people who do bad things in name of religion = people bad people who do good things in name of religion = religion good
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xJust so I understand this masterclass in logical reasoning: people who do bad things in name of religion = people bad people who do good things in name of religion = religion good Any bad person can use things like religion to gain power and trust and still have non pure thoughts and evil actions. Just like people can also use Government or become a School teacher and do bad things. Man is fallen. We are all fallen. We need to redeem ourselves first by our works and faith in the Lord. Not everyone is going to do this. And some of those people will take advantage of others. No man has the Grace of God. We need to work for this, strive for it and we might not get there either. But God doesn't want perfection either. He knows we have our flaws but at the same time expects us to carry our own cross according to our own measure and ability. Some people will carry a big cross, whilst others a small one, and others like you no cross at all for the time being. God made his own Son carry his cross. He did it to save us. Such is the love. What everyone needs to do is TRY.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xJust so I understand this masterclass in logical reasoning: people who do bad things in name of religion = people bad people who do good things in name of religion = religion good So would it be fare to say America is a terrorist country for invading Iraq on false information of them having WMD? Does it mean because the actions of George Bush and his party going to war it is fair to claim every American is a terrorist? I say this because some people in general have the opinion that if there is a priest who does wrong then he represents the whole chuch, every other denomination which he doesn't belong to and last but not least God himself.
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Has anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile?
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes there is a crusade going on against the Catholic Church. And after the Catholics, it will be the Anglicans, Lutherans and Orthodox. In fact it has been written as a prophecy in the revelations that before the end of times, Christianity will come under attack. Christianity will be persecuted. We are not even close to this yet, but when it happens vigilantes will be burning Church's, sacking Christians from jobs etc. This will mark the beginning of the evil one's reign on earth for 7 years. Then we will be graced with our Lord's presence who will come back in glory to defeat the evil one. The dead will awake, and both the living and dead will be judged. The dead have only fallen asleep. God has already determined that we as Christians will also carry our cross like Jesus did and we must accept it like Jesus did! In fact we as Christians look forward to it and will embrace our cross with great love. We are not afraid or scared. We look upon our cross as a gift from God.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. Regardless there's an appeal so there's still more to come.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence ? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. The evidence that was displayed to the jury ffs.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. There are also the testimonies of many people who claim that Cardinal Pell was never alone at any time when performing the sacraments as Archbishop, either before or after mass. There are testimonies that there were literally hundreds of people present. But apparently he is accused of being a Pedophile but all his offences were only in a 2 week period. Who do you think your kidding?
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. That is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to come, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. And yes, it was reported in 2017 and it is also written in Louise Milligan's book as well.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty. Did she? So let's get this straight! Louise Milligan came to the conclusion that Cardinal Pell was guilty. I find it very doubtful Louise Milligan is stupid enough to come to any such conclusions all by herself. Not even the mainstream media will commit to saying Cardinal Pell is guilty. They only say, "was found guilty" or its reported that but they won't come out and say he is guilty. No siree, they do have a much higher IQ than that.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty. Did she? So let's get this straight! Louise Milligan came to the conclusion that Cardinal Pell was guilty. I find it very doubtful Louise Milligan is stupid enough to come to any such conclusions all by herself. Not even the mainstream media will commit to saying Cardinal Pell is guilty. They only say, "was found guilty" or its reported that but they won't come out and say he is guilty. No siree, they do have a much higher IQ than that. I've been reading reviews of the book. The book certainly shows that Pell has a history of abusing kids and covering it up. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/explosive-book-back-on-the-shelves-after-george-pell-verdict-20190226-p510bi.htmlhttps://books.google.com.au/books/about/Cardinal.html?id=2d2rAQAACAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty. Did she? So let's get this straight! Louise Milligan came to the conclusion that Cardinal Pell was guilty. I find it very doubtful Louise Milligan is stupid enough to come to any such conclusions all by herself. Not even the mainstream media will commit to saying Cardinal Pell is guilty. They only say, "was found guilty" or its reported that but they won't come out and say he is guilty. No siree, they do have a much higher IQ than that. I've been reading reviews of the book. The book certainly shows that Pell has a history of abusing kids and covering it up. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/explosive-book-back-on-the-shelves-after-george-pell-verdict-20190226-p510bi.htmlhttps://books.google.com.au/books/about/Cardinal.html?id=2d2rAQAACAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y No it doesn't! It doesn't show anything of the sort. The book is about The Melbourne Project, not about Pell abusing children.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty. Did she? So let's get this straight! Louise Milligan came to the conclusion that Cardinal Pell was guilty. I find it very doubtful Louise Milligan is stupid enough to come to any such conclusions all by herself. Not even the mainstream media will commit to saying Cardinal Pell is guilty. They only say, "was found guilty" or its reported that but they won't come out and say he is guilty. No siree, they do have a much higher IQ than that. I've been reading reviews of the book. The book certainly shows that Pell has a history of abusing kids and covering it up. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/explosive-book-back-on-the-shelves-after-george-pell-verdict-20190226-p510bi.htmlhttps://books.google.com.au/books/about/Cardinal.html?id=2d2rAQAACAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y No it doesn't! It doesn't show anything of the sort. The book is about The Melbourne Project, not about Pell abusing children. Yes it is which is why the book wasn't on sale in Victoria until the trial was over.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty. Did she? So let's get this straight! Louise Milligan came to the conclusion that Cardinal Pell was guilty. I find it very doubtful Louise Milligan is stupid enough to come to any such conclusions all by herself. Not even the mainstream media will commit to saying Cardinal Pell is guilty. They only say, "was found guilty" or its reported that but they won't come out and say he is guilty. No siree, they do have a much higher IQ than that. I've been reading reviews of the book. The book certainly shows that Pell has a history of abusing kids and covering it up. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/explosive-book-back-on-the-shelves-after-george-pell-verdict-20190226-p510bi.htmlhttps://books.google.com.au/books/about/Cardinal.html?id=2d2rAQAACAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y No it doesn't! It doesn't show anything of the sort. The book is about The Melbourne Project, not about Pell abusing children. Yes it is which is why the book wasn't on sale in Victoria until the trial was over. No that wasn't the reason. The reason was because of the suppression order not because Milligan made any accusations against Pell other than being involved in a conspiracy to conflate and cover up through their Melbourne project. She did not claim Pell abused any child.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty. Did she? So let's get this straight! Louise Milligan came to the conclusion that Cardinal Pell was guilty. I find it very doubtful Louise Milligan is stupid enough to come to any such conclusions all by herself. Not even the mainstream media will commit to saying Cardinal Pell is guilty. They only say, "was found guilty" or its reported that but they won't come out and say he is guilty. No siree, they do have a much higher IQ than that. I've been reading reviews of the book. The book certainly shows that Pell has a history of abusing kids and covering it up. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/explosive-book-back-on-the-shelves-after-george-pell-verdict-20190226-p510bi.htmlhttps://books.google.com.au/books/about/Cardinal.html?id=2d2rAQAACAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y No it doesn't! It doesn't show anything of the sort. The book is about The Melbourne Project, not about Pell abusing children. Yes it is which is why the book wasn't on sale in Victoria until the trial was over. She did not claim Pell abused any child. "In the book, Milligan pieced together decades of disturbing activities and cover-ups by Pell.
"I wanted people to know what I have known about George Pell," said Milligan on Tuesday.
"We have been waiting for the justice system to run its course. Nothing can undo what has been done but some justice has prevailed." "
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]Has anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty. Did she? So let's get this straight! Louise Milligan came to the conclusion that Cardinal Pell was guilty. I find it very doubtful Louise Milligan is stupid enough to come to any such conclusions all by herself. Not even the mainstream media will commit to saying Cardinal Pell is guilty. They only say, "was found guilty" or its reported that but they won't come out and say he is guilty. No siree, they do have a much higher IQ than that. I've been reading reviews of the book. The book certainly shows that Pell has a history of abusing kids and covering it up. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/explosive-book-back-on-the-shelves-after-george-pell-verdict-20190226-p510bi.htmlhttps://books.google.com.au/books/about/Cardinal.html?id=2d2rAQAACAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y No it doesn't! It doesn't show anything of the sort. The book is about The Melbourne Project, not about Pell abusing children. Yes it is which is why the book wasn't on sale in Victoria until the trial was over. She did not claim Pell abused any child. "In the book, Milligan pieced together decades of disturbing activities and cover-ups by Pell.
"I wanted people to know what I have known about George Pell," said Milligan on Tuesday.
"We have been waiting for the justice system to run its course. Nothing can undo what has been done but some justice has prevailed." "
[/quote] What's this? This is no accusation that Pell abused children. This is only an accusation of a cover up.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]+x[quote]Has anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty. Did she? So let's get this straight! Louise Milligan came to the conclusion that Cardinal Pell was guilty. I find it very doubtful Louise Milligan is stupid enough to come to any such conclusions all by herself. Not even the mainstream media will commit to saying Cardinal Pell is guilty. They only say, "was found guilty" or its reported that but they won't come out and say he is guilty. No siree, they do have a much higher IQ than that. I've been reading reviews of the book. The book certainly shows that Pell has a history of abusing kids and covering it up. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/explosive-book-back-on-the-shelves-after-george-pell-verdict-20190226-p510bi.htmlhttps://books.google.com.au/books/about/Cardinal.html?id=2d2rAQAACAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y No it doesn't! It doesn't show anything of the sort. The book is about The Melbourne Project, not about Pell abusing children. Yes it is which is why the book wasn't on sale in Victoria until the trial was over. She did not claim Pell abused any child. "In the book, Milligan pieced together decades of disturbing activities and cover-ups by Pell.
"I wanted people to know what I have known about George Pell," said Milligan on Tuesday.
"We have been waiting for the justice system to run its course. Nothing can undo what has been done but some justice has prevailed." "
[/quote]What's this? This is no accusation that Pell abused children. This is only an accusation of a cover up. [/quote] Decades of disturbing activity certainly implies he did especially with the follow up quote ; "We have been waiting for the justice system to run its course. Nothing can undo what has been done but some justice has prevailed." Also covering up abuse is just as bad as committing the abuse imo. This quote also doesn't do Pell any favours. "Ms Adler said she was proud to have commissioned and published the book, and said Milligan was "a courageous reporter whose integrity, respect for the judicial process and meticulous research contributed to our understanding of the tragedy of institutional child abuse". https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/explosive-book-back-on-the-shelves-after-george-pell-verdict-20190226-p510bi.html
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty. Did she? So let's get this straight! Louise Milligan came to the conclusion that Cardinal Pell was guilty. I find it very doubtful Louise Milligan is stupid enough to come to any such conclusions all by herself. Not even the mainstream media will commit to saying Cardinal Pell is guilty. They only say, "was found guilty" or its reported that but they won't come out and say he is guilty. No siree, they do have a much higher IQ than that. Turns out he did do that but you're being very disingenuous by not including all of the details. "One of the accusers was drunk and upset, the court heard, and made allegations about abuse by Cardinal Pell, now 76, happening at a pool in country Victoria. However, the woman’s son himself failed to tell the group of his own alleged abuse, only making a police statement later, and instead “laughed”, the court heard. “It wasn’t a council of war about what to do … was it?” Mr Richter asked. The mother replied: “No.” Later, the sister of an alleged victim told how her brother drunkenly confided in her about alleged abuse by the Cardinal. “He said it was a bishop when he was in the choir … and he said it was ‘—-ing George Pell’.”
https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/2018/03/23/cardinal-george-pell-mother-changed-statement/
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty. Did she? So let's get this straight! Louise Milligan came to the conclusion that Cardinal Pell was guilty. I find it very doubtful Louise Milligan is stupid enough to come to any such conclusions all by herself. Not even the mainstream media will commit to saying Cardinal Pell is guilty. They only say, "was found guilty" or its reported that but they won't come out and say he is guilty. No siree, they do have a much higher IQ than that. Turns out he did do that but you're being very disingenuous by not including all of the details. "One of the accusers was drunk and upset, the court heard, and made allegations about abuse by Cardinal Pell, now 76, happening at a pool in country Victoria. However, the woman’s son himself failed to tell the group of his own alleged abuse, only making a police statement later, and instead “laughed”, the court heard. “It wasn’t a council of war about what to do … was it?” Mr Richter asked. The mother replied: “No.” Later, the sister of an alleged victim told how her brother drunkenly confided in her about alleged abuse by the Cardinal. “He said it was a bishop when he was in the choir … and he said it was ‘—-ing George Pell’.”
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/explosive-book-back-on-the-shelves-after-george-pell-verdict-20190226-p510bi.html
These were not even in court so again, you are throwing around unproven dirt. If there was any proof of this, it would have gotten to court but the accusations turtned out to be false or were withdrawn. I am talking about one of the Choir Boys who as it turns out admitted to Mum that Pell did not commit any abuse.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty. Did she? So let's get this straight! Louise Milligan came to the conclusion that Cardinal Pell was guilty. I find it very doubtful Louise Milligan is stupid enough to come to any such conclusions all by herself. Not even the mainstream media will commit to saying Cardinal Pell is guilty. They only say, "was found guilty" or its reported that but they won't come out and say he is guilty. No siree, they do have a much higher IQ than that. Turns out he did do that but you're being very disingenuous by not including all of the details. "One of the accusers was drunk and upset, the court heard, and made allegations about abuse by Cardinal Pell, now 76, happening at a pool in country Victoria. However, the woman’s son himself failed to tell the group of his own alleged abuse, only making a police statement later, and instead “laughed”, the court heard. “It wasn’t a council of war about what to do … was it?” Mr Richter asked. The mother replied: “No.” Later, the sister of an alleged victim told how her brother drunkenly confided in her about alleged abuse by the Cardinal. “He said it was a bishop when he was in the choir … and he said it was ‘—-ing George Pell’.”
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/explosive-book-back-on-the-shelves-after-george-pell-verdict-20190226-p510bi.html
These were not even in court so again, you are throwing around unproven dirt. If there was any proof of this, it would have gotten to court but the accusations turtned out to be false or were withdrawn. I am talking about one of the Choir Boys who as it turns out admitted to Mum that Pell did not commit any abuse. The kid died of a heroin overdose. So did this kid. It is very easy to mix them up.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse". This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. Yes that's right. They are the only source not carrying a pitched fork. Everyone else is so polarized they are not thinking straight. The secular warlords have hijacked this case and want their scalp of a Cardinal at all cost. that is what is going on. This trial isn't a fair trial and it never was going to be. We will be hearing about it for years to become, because this IS NOT JUSTICE or due process. You literally picked a biased source and them claimed that every other souce is biased. lol ok. No I didn't. I picked the only alternative sources to the vigilantes. There are other sources too, but you won't like them either. And it was reported in The Age, SMH by Louise Milligan. It's also in her book. So not just the Catholic Source. It's in the book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal George Pell by Louise Milligan. https://twitter.com/Milliganreports I don't have the book so I can't read it but the book came to the conclusion that he was guilty. Did she? So let's get this straight! Louise Milligan came to the conclusion that Cardinal Pell was guilty. I find it very doubtful Louise Milligan is stupid enough to come to any such conclusions all by herself. Not even the mainstream media will commit to saying Cardinal Pell is guilty. They only say, "was found guilty" or its reported that but they won't come out and say he is guilty. No siree, they do have a much higher IQ than that. Turns out he did do that but you're being very disingenuous by not including all of the details. "One of the accusers was drunk and upset, the court heard, and made allegations about abuse by Cardinal Pell, now 76, happening at a pool in country Victoria. However, the woman’s son himself failed to tell the group of his own alleged abuse, only making a police statement later, and instead “laughed”, the court heard. “It wasn’t a council of war about what to do … was it?” Mr Richter asked. The mother replied: “No.” Later, the sister of an alleged victim told how her brother drunkenly confided in her about alleged abuse by the Cardinal. “He said it was a bishop when he was in the choir … and he said it was ‘—-ing George Pell’.”
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/explosive-book-back-on-the-shelves-after-george-pell-verdict-20190226-p510bi.html
These were not even in court so again, you are throwing around unproven dirt. If there was any proof of this, it would have gotten to court but the accusations turtned out to be false or were withdrawn. I am talking about one of the Choir Boys who as it turns out admitted to Mum that Pell did not commit any abuse. The kid died of a heroin overdose. So did this kid. It is very easy to mix them up. Actually no, we are talking about the kid referred to as 1 of the victims, not something that was thrown out instantly. In any case, it doesn't change the fact that the evidence is flakey at best, and Pell could win his appeal.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse".
This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. You know very well every source will use the word ' reportedly' regardless of it being mainstream media or not. You asked for a source and mouflonrouge provided you with one. You can't just disregard it because it doesn't tell the story you want told. I don't know if Pell will win this case and have the guilty sentence overturned. But if it is overturned in court my questionto you is would you then accept that ruling and consider him innocent, or would you stick to your guns and claim he is guilty? And don't forget that the case is far from over. There will be an appeal and only then if still found guilty will this be the final say and case closed.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse".
This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. You know very well every source will use the word ' reportedly' regardless of it being mainstream media or not. You asked for a source and mouflonrouge provided you with one. You can't just disregard it because it doesn't tell the story you want told. I don't know if Pell will win this case and have the guilty sentence overturned. But if it is overturned in court my questionto you is would you then accept that ruling and consider him innocent, or would you stick to your guns and claim he is guilty? And don't forget that the case is far from over. There will be an appeal and only then if still found guilty will this be the final say and case closed. It was only reported by one Catholic source which is why I am sceptical. If it was reported by mainstream media, then I would believe it. Even if the phrase 'reportedly' was used by mainstream media, it doesn't necessarily mean it's true. If it was 100% true, then the word 'reportedly' wouldn't have been true.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse".
This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. You know very well every source will use the word ' reportedly' regardless of it being mainstream media or not. You asked for a source and mouflonrouge provided you with one. You can't just disregard it because it doesn't tell the story you want told. I don't know if Pell will win this case and have the guilty sentence overturned. But if it is overturned in court my questionto you is would you then accept that ruling and consider him innocent, or would you stick to your guns and claim he is guilty? And don't forget that the case is far from over. There will be an appeal and only then if still found guilty will this be the final say and case closed. It was only reported by one Catholic source which is why I am sceptical. If it was reported by mainstream media, then I would believe it. Even if the phrase 'reportedly' was used by mainstream media, it doesn't necessarily mean it's true. If it was 100% true, then the word 'reportedly' wouldn't have been true. No I meant even mainstream media reported that George Pell reportedly molested a kid. I'm just saying it goes both ways. Anyways overall there is no worse crime then peadophillea and anyone who is rightfully convicted of this crime, and even those who have got away with it will rot in hell. My only issue with people is when these crimes are seen as a Christianity thing, when in fact it is individuals committing these crimes, and even if as an institution if true that the Vatican covers these crimes up, they too don't represent every single Christian denomination, or even those believers inside their church. This is why I hate when people swear about God, Jesus, and paint all priests with the same brush. And I'm not accusing you of doing this just people in general.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse".
This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. You know very well every source will use the word ' reportedly' regardless of it being mainstream media or not. You asked for a source and mouflonrouge provided you with one. You can't just disregard it because it doesn't tell the story you want told. I don't know if Pell will win this case and have the guilty sentence overturned. But if it is overturned in court my questionto you is would you then accept that ruling and consider him innocent, or would you stick to your guns and claim he is guilty? And don't forget that the case is far from over. There will be an appeal and only then if still found guilty will this be the final say and case closed. It was only reported by one Catholic source which is why I am sceptical. If it was reported by mainstream media, then I would believe it. Even if the phrase 'reportedly' was used by mainstream media, it doesn't necessarily mean it's true. If it was 100% true, then the word 'reportedly' wouldn't have been true. No I meant even mainstream media reported that George Pell reportedly molested a kid. I'm just saying it goes both ways. Anyways overall there is no worse crime then peadophillea and anyone who is rightfully convicted of this crime, and even those who have got away with it will rot in hell. My only issue with people is when these crimes are seen as a Christianity thing, when in fact it is individuals committing these crimes, and even if as an institution if true that the Vatican covers these crimes up, they too don't represent every single Christian denomination, or even those believers inside their church. This is why I hate when people swear about God, Jesus, and paint all priests with the same brush. And I'm not accusing you of doing this just people in general. Agree with that and fair enough. It's completely unfair to judge a whole religion over the actions of a few individuals. However, many members of the church have attempted to cover up abuse which is an issue the church needs to address which is what I think Muz was eluding to.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse".
This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. You know very well every source will use the word ' reportedly' regardless of it being mainstream media or not. You asked for a source and mouflonrouge provided you with one. You can't just disregard it because it doesn't tell the story you want told. I don't know if Pell will win this case and have the guilty sentence overturned. But if it is overturned in court my questionto you is would you then accept that ruling and consider him innocent, or would you stick to your guns and claim he is guilty? And don't forget that the case is far from over. There will be an appeal and only then if still found guilty will this be the final say and case closed. It was only reported by one Catholic source which is why I am sceptical. If it was reported by mainstream media, then I would believe it. Even if the phrase 'reportedly' was used by mainstream media, it doesn't necessarily mean it's true. If it was 100% true, then the word 'reportedly' wouldn't have been true. No I meant even mainstream media reported that George Pell reportedly molested a kid. I'm just saying it goes both ways. Anyways overall there is no worse crime then peadophillea and anyone who is rightfully convicted of this crime, and even those who have got away with it will rot in hell. My only issue with people is when these crimes are seen as a Christianity thing, when in fact it is individuals committing these crimes, and even if as an institution if true that the Vatican covers these crimes up, they too don't represent every single Christian denomination, or even those believers inside their church. This is why I hate when people swear about God, Jesus, and paint all priests with the same brush. And I'm not accusing you of doing this just people in general. Agree with that and fair enough. It's completely unfair to judge a whole religion over the actions of a few individuals. However, many members of the church have attempted to cover up abuse which is an issue the church needs to address which is what I think Muz was eluding to. There is no evidence that many members tried to cover anything up. There are allegations that Archbishop Pell tried to protect the Church from any fallout through The Melbourne Project but it wasn't an attempt to cover anything up.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse".
This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. You know very well every source will use the word ' reportedly' regardless of it being mainstream media or not. You asked for a source and mouflonrouge provided you with one. You can't just disregard it because it doesn't tell the story you want told. I don't know if Pell will win this case and have the guilty sentence overturned. But if it is overturned in court my questionto you is would you then accept that ruling and consider him innocent, or would you stick to your guns and claim he is guilty? And don't forget that the case is far from over. There will be an appeal and only then if still found guilty will this be the final say and case closed. It was only reported by one Catholic source which is why I am sceptical. If it was reported by mainstream media, then I would believe it. Even if the phrase 'reportedly' was used by mainstream media, it doesn't necessarily mean it's true. If it was 100% true, then the word 'reportedly' wouldn't have been true. No I meant even mainstream media reported that George Pell reportedly molested a kid. I'm just saying it goes both ways. Anyways overall there is no worse crime then peadophillea and anyone who is rightfully convicted of this crime, and even those who have got away with it will rot in hell. My only issue with people is when these crimes are seen as a Christianity thing, when in fact it is individuals committing these crimes, and even if as an institution if true that the Vatican covers these crimes up, they too don't represent every single Christian denomination, or even those believers inside their church. This is why I hate when people swear about God, Jesus, and paint all priests with the same brush. And I'm not accusing you of doing this just people in general. Agree with that and fair enough. It's completely unfair to judge a whole religion over the actions of a few individuals. However, many members of the church have attempted to cover up abuse which is an issue the church needs to address which is what I think Muz was eluding to. There is no evidence that many members tried to cover anything up. There are allegations that Archbishop Pell tried to protect the Church from any fallout through The Melbourne Project but it wasn't an attempt to cover anything up. I wasn't referring to this case. I said that it happens and it's an issue the church needs to address.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187 The only sources you provided are from a church website and a canon law lecturer. "Before his death, the deceased man reportedly told his mother at least twice that he had not been a victim of sexual abuse".
This hasn't been reported anywhere else to this is nearly certainly complete bullshit. That wasn't reported by any mainstream media organisations. I bet they used the word 'reportedly' to cover their asses. You know very well every source will use the word ' reportedly' regardless of it being mainstream media or not. You asked for a source and mouflonrouge provided you with one. You can't just disregard it because it doesn't tell the story you want told. I don't know if Pell will win this case and have the guilty sentence overturned. But if it is overturned in court my questionto you is would you then accept that ruling and consider him innocent, or would you stick to your guns and claim he is guilty? And don't forget that the case is far from over. There will be an appeal and only then if still found guilty will this be the final say and case closed. It was only reported by one Catholic source which is why I am sceptical. If it was reported by mainstream media, then I would believe it. Even if the phrase 'reportedly' was used by mainstream media, it doesn't necessarily mean it's true. If it was 100% true, then the word 'reportedly' wouldn't have been true. It was only picked up by the catholic Source. It was actually reported by The Age first, then SMH and ABC. And also reported in Louise Milligan's book: The Rise and Fall of Cardinal Pell
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. Well if you can disagree with the fact that the church has been complicit and active in the abuse and covering up of abuse over decades (if not centuries) despite all evidence to the contrary as Aikhme has then you can easily disagree with just about anything.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. Well if you can disagree with the fact that the church has been complicit and active in the abuse and covering up of abuse over decades (if not centuries) despite all evidence to the contrary as Aikhme has then you can easily disagree with just about anything. I've never said the Roman Catholic church hasn't covered up. Again you put words into my mouth. I've previously said to you that the Roman Catholic church doing wrong doesn't make it right to ban all religions like is your wish. I'm not Roman Catholic so it would be unfair on my church to suffer what you wish upon them based off their cover up that has zero to do with my church and more importantly God. And same for the Roman Catholics themselves. There are millions within their church that wouldn't touch a kid and do more good in life than evil. But let's paint them all with the same brush. As for Pell himself I truly believe he's innocent in this case based off the evidence I've read of and the interview I've watched of Pell being interviewed by the police.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. Well if you can disagree with the fact that the church has been complicit and active in the abuse and covering up of abuse over decades (if not centuries) despite all evidence to the contrary as Aikhme has then you can easily disagree with just about anything. I've never said the Roman Catholic church hasn't covered up (1). Again you put words into my mouth. I've previously said to you that the Roman Catholic church doing wrong doesn't make it right to ban all religions like is your wish. (2) I'm not Roman Catholic so it would be unfair on my church to suffer what you wish upon them based off their cover up that has zero to do with my church and more importantly God. And same for the Roman Catholics themselves. There are millions within their church that wouldn't touch a kid and do more good in life than evil. But let's paint them all with the same brush. As for Pell himself I truly believe he's innocent in this case based off the evidence I've read of and the interview I've watched of Pell being interviewed by the police. (1) I didn't say you did. (2) And I never called for them to be banned so, as you say 'stop putting words in my mouth'. I said I wish they'd die out. You'd have to have rocks in your head if you thought only the Catholic church are guilty what's transpired. You can bet every other religion would have skeletons piled a mile high in their collective closets.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. Well if you can disagree with the fact that the church has been complicit and active in the abuse and covering up of abuse over decades (if not centuries) despite all evidence to the contrary as Aikhme has then you can easily disagree with just about anything. I've never said the Roman Catholic church hasn't covered up (1). Again you put words into my mouth. I've previously said to you that the Roman Catholic church doing wrong doesn't make it right to ban all religions like is your wish. (2) I'm not Roman Catholic so it would be unfair on my church to suffer what you wish upon them based off their cover up that has zero to do with my church and more importantly God. And same for the Roman Catholics themselves. There are millions within their church that wouldn't touch a kid and do more good in life than evil. But let's paint them all with the same brush. As for Pell himself I truly believe he's innocent in this case based off the evidence I've read of and the interview I've watched of Pell being interviewed by the police. (1) I didn't say you did. (2) And I never called for them to be banned so, as you say 'stop putting words in my mouth'. I said I wish they'd die out. You'd have to have rocks in your head if you thought only the Catholic church are guilty what's transpired. You can bet every other religion would have skeletons piled a mile high in their collective closets. You basically proved my point in number 2 there lol. And when you say you could bet your life lol omg I can't help but laugh. Based off zero evidence you have claimed my church is guilty of molesting children even though till this day there's been zero claims from anyone lol wow just wow. And even if you're right that still would mean that individual priest did wrong not the whole church. There's cases of teachers who have molested kids so what's your idea on teachers? Yeh mate let's ban teachers at schools from teaching our kids because some molest our kids, let's stop government funding of our schools because they are evil. Our police officers have committed some crimes too when really they are there to b protect us, you know what let's ban police and cut the funding. Honestly just put some thought into your comments. It really helps.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. Well if you can disagree with the fact that the church has been complicit and active in the abuse and covering up of abuse over decades (if not centuries) despite all evidence to the contrary as Aikhme has then you can easily disagree with just about anything. I've never said the Roman Catholic church hasn't covered up (1). Again you put words into my mouth. I've previously said to you that the Roman Catholic church doing wrong doesn't make it right to ban all religions like is your wish. (2) I'm not Roman Catholic so it would be unfair on my church to suffer what you wish upon them based off their cover up that has zero to do with my church and more importantly God. And same for the Roman Catholics themselves. There are millions within their church that wouldn't touch a kid and do more good in life than evil. But let's paint them all with the same brush. As for Pell himself I truly believe he's innocent in this case based off the evidence I've read of and the interview I've watched of Pell being interviewed by the police. (1) I didn't say you did. (2) And I never called for them to be banned so, as you say 'stop putting words in my mouth'. I said I wish they'd die out. You'd have to have rocks in your head if you thought only the Catholic church are guilty what's transpired. You can bet every other religion would have skeletons piled a mile high in their collective closets. You basically proved my point in number 2 there lol. And when you say you could bet your life lol omg I can't help but laugh. Based off zero evidence you have claimed my church is guilty of molesting children even though till this day there's been zero claims from anyone lol wow just wow. And even if you're right that still would mean that individual priest did wrong not the whole church. There's cases of teachers who have molested kids so what's your idea on teachers? Yeh mate let's ban teachers at schools from teaching our kids because some molest our kids, let's stop government funding of our schools because they are evil. Our police officers have committed some crimes too when really they are there to b protect us, you know what let's ban police and cut the funding. Honestly just put some thought into your comments. It really helps. Well what is your church Rob? Let's do a little bit of googling and find out shall we?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. Well if you can disagree with the fact that the church has been complicit and active in the abuse and covering up of abuse over decades (if not centuries) despite all evidence to the contrary as Aikhme has then you can easily disagree with just about anything. I've never said the Roman Catholic church hasn't covered up (1). Again you put words into my mouth. I've previously said to you that the Roman Catholic church doing wrong doesn't make it right to ban all religions like is your wish. (2) I'm not Roman Catholic so it would be unfair on my church to suffer what you wish upon them based off their cover up that has zero to do with my church and more importantly God. And same for the Roman Catholics themselves. There are millions within their church that wouldn't touch a kid and do more good in life than evil. But let's paint them all with the same brush. As for Pell himself I truly believe he's innocent in this case based off the evidence I've read of and the interview I've watched of Pell being interviewed by the police. (1) I didn't say you did. (2) And I never called for them to be banned so, as you say 'stop putting words in my mouth'. I said I wish they'd die out. You'd have to have rocks in your head if you thought only the Catholic church are guilty what's transpired. You can bet every other religion would have skeletons piled a mile high in their collective closets. You basically proved my point in number 2 there lol. And when you say you could bet your life lol omg I can't help but laugh. Based off zero evidence you have claimed my church is guilty of molesting children even though till this day there's been zero claims from anyone lol wow just wow. And even if you're right that still would mean that individual priest did wrong not the whole church. There's cases of teachers who have molested kids so what's your idea on teachers? Yeh mate let's ban teachers at schools from teaching our kids because some molest our kids, let's stop government funding of our schools because they are evil. Our police officers have committed some crimes too when really they are there to b protect us, you know what let's ban police and cut the funding. Honestly just put some thought into your comments. It really helps. Well what is your church Rob? Let's do a little bit of googling and find out shall we? And when you find zero articles on Google what will you then claim? Will you change your mind? No! Will I get an apology? No!
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. Well if you can disagree with the fact that the church has been complicit and active in the abuse and covering up of abuse over decades (if not centuries) despite all evidence to the contrary as Aikhme has then you can easily disagree with just about anything. I've never said the Roman Catholic church hasn't covered up (1). Again you put words into my mouth. I've previously said to you that the Roman Catholic church doing wrong doesn't make it right to ban all religions like is your wish. (2) I'm not Roman Catholic so it would be unfair on my church to suffer what you wish upon them based off their cover up that has zero to do with my church and more importantly God. And same for the Roman Catholics themselves. There are millions within their church that wouldn't touch a kid and do more good in life than evil. But let's paint them all with the same brush. As for Pell himself I truly believe he's innocent in this case based off the evidence I've read of and the interview I've watched of Pell being interviewed by the police. (1) I didn't say you did. (2) And I never called for them to be banned so, as you say 'stop putting words in my mouth'. I said I wish they'd die out. You'd have to have rocks in your head if you thought only the Catholic church are guilty what's transpired. You can bet every other religion would have skeletons piled a mile high in their collective closets. You basically proved my point in number 2 there lol. And when you say you could bet your life lol omg I can't help but laugh. Based off zero evidence you have claimed my church is guilty of molesting children even though till this day there's been zero claims from anyone lol wow just wow. And even if you're right that still would mean that individual priest did wrong not the whole church. There's cases of teachers who have molested kids so what's your idea on teachers? Yeh mate let's ban teachers at schools from teaching our kids because some molest our kids, let's stop government funding of our schools because they are evil. Our police officers have committed some crimes too when really they are there to b protect us, you know what let's ban police and cut the funding. Honestly just put some thought into your comments. It really helps. Well what is your church Rob? Let's do a little bit of googling and find out shall we? And when you find zero articles on Google what will you then claim? Will you change your mind? No! Will I get an apology? No! Tell you what Rob if your religion is not guilty of abuses then I will apologise to your religion. I trust you will offer me the same courtesy?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. Well if you can disagree with the fact that the church has been complicit and active in the abuse and covering up of abuse over decades (if not centuries) despite all evidence to the contrary as Aikhme has then you can easily disagree with just about anything. I've never said the Roman Catholic church hasn't covered up (1). Again you put words into my mouth. I've previously said to you that the Roman Catholic church doing wrong doesn't make it right to ban all religions like is your wish. (2) I'm not Roman Catholic so it would be unfair on my church to suffer what you wish upon them based off their cover up that has zero to do with my church and more importantly God. And same for the Roman Catholics themselves. There are millions within their church that wouldn't touch a kid and do more good in life than evil. But let's paint them all with the same brush. As for Pell himself I truly believe he's innocent in this case based off the evidence I've read of and the interview I've watched of Pell being interviewed by the police. (1) I didn't say you did. (2) And I never called for them to be banned so, as you say 'stop putting words in my mouth'. I said I wish they'd die out. You'd have to have rocks in your head if you thought only the Catholic church are guilty what's transpired. You can bet every other religion would have skeletons piled a mile high in their collective closets. You basically proved my point in number 2 there lol. And when you say you could bet your life lol omg I can't help but laugh. Based off zero evidence you have claimed my church is guilty of molesting children even though till this day there's been zero claims from anyone lol wow just wow. And even if you're right that still would mean that individual priest did wrong not the whole church. There's cases of teachers who have molested kids so what's your idea on teachers? Yeh mate let's ban teachers at schools from teaching our kids because some molest our kids, let's stop government funding of our schools because they are evil. Our police officers have committed some crimes too when really they are there to b protect us, you know what let's ban police and cut the funding. Honestly just put some thought into your comments. It really helps. Well what is your church Rob? Let's do a little bit of googling and find out shall we? And when you find zero articles on Google what will you then claim? Will you change your mind? No! Will I get an apology? No! Tell you what Rob if your religion is not guilty of abuses then I will apologise to your religion. I trust you will offer me the same courtesy? Honestly Muz I highly doubt you'll apologize and you'll come up with some invalid excuse not to. Go do your research on Assyrian Church of the East. One of the oldest Christian religions. But again even though I'm sure there isn't a case against my church I'm still supporting many other Christian religions that can claim the same thing. There's plenty of orthodox churches both eastern and western who I'd believe won't have many articles. But overall you ignore the main thing here that not all cases against the Roman Catholic church are true, just like not all cases of rape by woman against men are true. And those guilty are human beings themselves so you can't go and blame God ( not that you believe God exists ) for their actions and expect all followers of that faith to be okay with child molestation. They too are disgusted in the actions of those who do wrong but they don't need to turn away from faith because of the actions of someone evil.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. Well if you can disagree with the fact that the church has been complicit and active in the abuse and covering up of abuse over decades (if not centuries) despite all evidence to the contrary as Aikhme has then you can easily disagree with just about anything. I've never said the Roman Catholic church hasn't covered up (1). Again you put words into my mouth. I've previously said to you that the Roman Catholic church doing wrong doesn't make it right to ban all religions like is your wish. (2) I'm not Roman Catholic so it would be unfair on my church to suffer what you wish upon them based off their cover up that has zero to do with my church and more importantly God. And same for the Roman Catholics themselves. There are millions within their church that wouldn't touch a kid and do more good in life than evil. But let's paint them all with the same brush. As for Pell himself I truly believe he's innocent in this case based off the evidence I've read of and the interview I've watched of Pell being interviewed by the police. (1) I didn't say you did. (2) And I never called for them to be banned so, as you say 'stop putting words in my mouth'. I said I wish they'd die out. You'd have to have rocks in your head if you thought only the Catholic church are guilty what's transpired. You can bet every other religion would have skeletons piled a mile high in their collective closets. You basically proved my point in number 2 there lol. And when you say you could bet your life lol omg I can't help but laugh. Based off zero evidence you have claimed my church is guilty of molesting children even though till this day there's been zero claims from anyone lol wow just wow. And even if you're right that still would mean that individual priest did wrong not the whole church. There's cases of teachers who have molested kids so what's your idea on teachers? Yeh mate let's ban teachers at schools from teaching our kids because some molest our kids, let's stop government funding of our schools because they are evil. Our police officers have committed some crimes too when really they are there to b protect us, you know what let's ban police and cut the funding. Honestly just put some thought into your comments. It really helps. Well what is your church Rob? Let's do a little bit of googling and find out shall we? And when you find zero articles on Google what will you then claim? Will you change your mind? No! Will I get an apology? No! Tell you what Rob if your religion is not guilty of abuses then I will apologise to your religion. I trust you will offer me the same courtesy? Honestly Muz I highly doubt you'll apologize and you'll come up with some invalid excuse not to. Go do your research on Assyrian Church of the East. One of the oldest Christian religions. But again even though I'm sure there isn't a case against my church I'm still supporting many other Christian religions that can claim the same thing. There's plenty of orthodox churches both eastern and western who I'd believe won't have many articles. But overall you ignore the main thing here that not all cases against the Roman Catholic church are true, just like not all cases of rape by woman against men are true. And those guilty are human beings themselves so you can't go and blame God ( not that you believe God exists ) for their actions and expect all followers of that faith to be okay with child molestation. They too are disgusted in the actions of those who do wrong but they don't need to turn away from faith because of the actions of someone evil. Well Rob a quick cursory look seems to place you on good ground. Congratulations I unreservedly apologise for casting aspersions on your religion.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. Well if you can disagree with the fact that the church has been complicit and active in the abuse and covering up of abuse over decades (if not centuries) despite all evidence to the contrary as Aikhme has then you can easily disagree with just about anything. I've never said the Roman Catholic church hasn't covered up (1). Again you put words into my mouth. I've previously said to you that the Roman Catholic church doing wrong doesn't make it right to ban all religions like is your wish. (2) I'm not Roman Catholic so it would be unfair on my church to suffer what you wish upon them based off their cover up that has zero to do with my church and more importantly God. And same for the Roman Catholics themselves. There are millions within their church that wouldn't touch a kid and do more good in life than evil. But let's paint them all with the same brush. As for Pell himself I truly believe he's innocent in this case based off the evidence I've read of and the interview I've watched of Pell being interviewed by the police. (1) I didn't say you did. (2) And I never called for them to be banned so, as you say 'stop putting words in my mouth'. I said I wish they'd die out. You'd have to have rocks in your head if you thought only the Catholic church are guilty what's transpired. You can bet every other religion would have skeletons piled a mile high in their collective closets. You basically proved my point in number 2 there lol. And when you say you could bet your life lol omg I can't help but laugh. Based off zero evidence you have claimed my church is guilty of molesting children even though till this day there's been zero claims from anyone lol wow just wow. And even if you're right that still would mean that individual priest did wrong not the whole church. There's cases of teachers who have molested kids so what's your idea on teachers? Yeh mate let's ban teachers at schools from teaching our kids because some molest our kids, let's stop government funding of our schools because they are evil. Our police officers have committed some crimes too when really they are there to b protect us, you know what let's ban police and cut the funding. Honestly just put some thought into your comments. It really helps. Well what is your church Rob? Let's do a little bit of googling and find out shall we? And when you find zero articles on Google what will you then claim? Will you change your mind? No! Will I get an apology? No! Tell you what Rob if your religion is not guilty of abuses then I will apologise to your religion. I trust you will offer me the same courtesy? Honestly Muz I highly doubt you'll apologize and you'll come up with some invalid excuse not to. Go do your research on Assyrian Church of the East. One of the oldest Christian religions. But again even though I'm sure there isn't a case against my church I'm still supporting many other Christian religions that can claim the same thing. There's plenty of orthodox churches both eastern and western who I'd believe won't have many articles. But overall you ignore the main thing here that not all cases against the Roman Catholic church are true, just like not all cases of rape by woman against men are true. And those guilty are human beings themselves so you can't go and blame God ( not that you believe God exists ) for their actions and expect all followers of that faith to be okay with child molestation. They too are disgusted in the actions of those who do wrong but they don't need to turn away from faith because of the actions of someone evil. Well Rob a quick cursory look seems to place you on good ground. Congratulations I unreservedly apologise for casting aspersions on your religion. 😲 wow I'm impressed 😂 I guess I was wrong about getting an apology from you.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. Well if you can disagree with the fact that the church has been complicit and active in the abuse and covering up of abuse over decades (if not centuries) despite all evidence to the contrary as Aikhme has then you can easily disagree with just about anything. I've never said the Roman Catholic church hasn't covered up. Again you put words into my mouth. I've previously said to you that the Roman Catholic church doing wrong doesn't make it right to ban all religions like is your wish. I'm not Roman Catholic so it would be unfair on my church to suffer what you wish upon them based off their cover up that has zero to do with my church and more importantly God. And same for the Roman Catholics themselves. There are millions within their church that wouldn't touch a kid and do more good in life than evil. But let's paint them all with the same brush. As for Pell himself I truly believe he's innocent in this case based off the evidence I've read of and the interview I've watched of Pell being interviewed by the police. Anyone who looks at the testimonies and evidence understands that the court was a Kangaroo Court. I'm with you. The evidence against Pell is extremely weak.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. Well if you can disagree with the fact that the church has been complicit and active in the abuse and covering up of abuse over decades (if not centuries) despite all evidence to the contrary as Aikhme has then you can easily disagree with just about anything. There is no evidence that the Church covered anything up. The Church is never going to answer to you or anyone. That will never happen.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. It's not a question of not believing the victims. The evidence was purely hearsay. The public wanted a conviction so Pell became the scapegoat.. Pell may have been handed his cross by God. This may be the cross he needs to bear. We will never know. But do not be surprised that this conviction could be overturned. Cui Bono! He has been accused as being a Pedophile. And yet he is only accused of abusing 2 boys in a very brief period. I find this very hard to believe. There would surely be more victims but there are none. Also, a Jury had previously found him NOT GUILTY 10 votes to 2, before this Jury was dismissed by the crown and another set up. Why? In addition, if he was guilty, he would not have come to Australia and face the charges. He came because he thought he could defend his reputation. In addition, the Vatican has not dismissed Cardinal Pell either, which to me indicated they are not impressed. I believe Pell is innocent.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. It's not a question of not believing the victims. The evidence was purely hearsay. The public wanted a conviction so Pell became the scapegoat.. Pell may have been handed his cross by God. This may be the cross he needs to bear. We will never know. But do not be surprised that this conviction could be overturned. Cui Bono! He has been accused as being a Pedophile. And yet he is only accused of abusing 2 boys in a very brief period. I find this very hard to believe. There would surely be more victims but there are none. Also, a Jury had previously found him NOT GUILTY 10 votes to 2, before this Jury was dismissed by the crown and another set up. Why?In addition, if he was guilty, he would not have come to Australia and face the charges. He came because he thought he could defend his reputation. In addition, the Vatican has not dismissed Cardinal Pell either, which to me indicated they are not impressed. I believe Pell is innocent. That's simply not true so stop lying. It has been rumoured that the jurors in the mistrial were split 10-to-two in favour of Pell. Is this right?This is an unverified rumour with no credible source. There have been plenty of other rumours about the split in the mistrial, including that it was more even. The weight of the split makes no difference. The law requires a unanimous or 11-to-one verdict, and anything else results in a mistrial. The chief judge is not told of the split and he made it clear he did not want to know. Any juror who reveals the split breaks the law.The mistrial split is also irrelevant in the appeal court. In the retrial, both parties may learn from their mistakes, change their approach and refine their arguments. It would be unfair to then judge the verdict in a retrial against the verdict in the mistrial. In Pell’s retrial, witnesses were dropped by mutual agreement of both parties, and Richter added a power point presentation to his defence. One new witness was added. It was similar, but not the same, as the first.https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/mar/02/cardinal-george-pells-conviction-the-questions-that-remain
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. So what, were you only born yesterday? You do realise there is thousands of cases around the world where people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit. The evidence wasn't that strong at all and basically the jury had to make a decision. Also the decision has been appealed so it isn't completely finished even though Pell has been sentenced. Honestly I wouldn't have a go at you thinking he is guilty as you're entitled to go with your instincts but so are those who believe he is innocent. That's all I'm saying and I don't think you can disagree with that surely. There are rare instances where innocent people are locked up. However in this case, the jury had little doubt about Pell's guilt. If one of the jury was somehow biased, they'd have to somehow convince the rest of the jury to side with them. And how did they base this judgment? On what evidence? Where is the smoking gun. They took the testimony of 1 person and another who is no longer alive and who also admitted to their Mother that he lied and that Cardinal Pell did not sexually assault him. Yes, this is all true. When Pell was given an opportunity to take the stand, he declined. This is what a pious man would do. They would embrace their cross. Jesus also declined to speak in his defence in front of Pontius. For his fate was already sealed. That is absolute bullshit that you've made up and incredibly disrespectful to the victims. The more you've been posting, the more odious you make yourself look. I didn't make this up at all. This was all revealed in various testimonies but was dismissed. Provide a source then. You will not like the source! But it is a source that provides the other side. https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=79557In addition, it was also reported in The Age in 2017 and also in a book about Pell written by Journalist Louise Milligan. One more thing. The Vatican has its own legal and judicial system under its own canonical Laws. Cardinal Pell has to face the accusations of wrong doingf from the Holy Sea as well. But it is likely he will be found innocent. They will only look at the evidence and the evidence alone and there doesn't seem to be any. https://theconversation.com/the-catholic-church-is-investigating-george-pells-case-what-does-that-mean-113187
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xHas anyone ever claimed every single Catholic is a paedophile? Yes scroll up and find out for yourself. This whole debate didn't just start out of nowhere, and pretty much started by the view of some who believe Christianity should be wiped out, and the reasons for that pretty much because the whole idea is bullshit, and also because of certain priests who have committed crimes and therefore if they do that then the church should be closed down. It also seems normal to many these days to believe the words of a man claiming he got molested by George Pell, however at the same time it's evil for anyone to think George Pell didn't actually do it. None of us know 100% if he is guilty or not and at the end of the day it comes down to each and everyone's personal opinion. Personally the evidence given on Pell is weak as fuck in my opinion especially the claim that the molesting occurred straight after mass which is pretty fucking laughable considering the amount of people around at that time. But anyways that's another matter my point is everyone's got an opinion and no one knows who's right or wrong 100%. Anyways I'm not saying you're one who wants Christianity banned, but that is what others claimed in this thread, hense why mouflonrouge is coming out defending the religion, and not necessarily someone who is guilty of a crime. Because he was found guilty in a court of law. Saying he didn't do it and not believing the victims makes it even harder for the victims to speak out. It's hard enough to speak out about being abused without being attacked for doing so. If the victims are being shamed for speaking out, less victims are going to speak out and more pedo's are going to get away with their crimes. It's not a question of not believing the victims. The evidence was purely hearsay. The public wanted a conviction so Pell became the scapegoat.. Pell may have been handed his cross by God. This may be the cross he needs to bear. We will never know. But do not be surprised that this conviction could be overturned. Cui Bono! He has been accused as being a Pedophile. And yet he is only accused of abusing 2 boys in a very brief period. I find this very hard to believe. There would surely be more victims but there are none. Also, a Jury had previously found him NOT GUILTY 10 votes to 2, before this Jury was dismissed by the crown and another set up. Why?In addition, if he was guilty, he would not have come to Australia and face the charges. He came because he thought he could defend his reputation. In addition, the Vatican has not dismissed Cardinal Pell either, which to me indicated they are not impressed. I believe Pell is innocent. That's simply not true so stop lying. It has been rumoured that the jurors in the mistrial were split 10-to-two in favour of Pell. Is this right?This is an unverified rumour with no credible source. There have been plenty of other rumours about the split in the mistrial, including that it was more even. The weight of the split makes no difference. The law requires a unanimous or 11-to-one verdict, and anything else results in a mistrial. The chief judge is not told of the split and he made it clear he did not want to know. Any juror who reveals the split breaks the law.The mistrial split is also irrelevant in the appeal court. In the retrial, both parties may learn from their mistakes, change their approach and refine their arguments. It would be unfair to then judge the verdict in a retrial against the verdict in the mistrial. In Pell’s retrial, witnesses were dropped by mutual agreement of both parties, and Richter added a power point presentation to his defence. One new witness was added. It was similar, but not the same, as the first.https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/mar/02/cardinal-george-pells-conviction-the-questions-that-remain You can run to The Guardian but you can't hide. The Vatican has the best lawyers and the ability to hang you all by your petards! https://catholiccitizens.org/news/82669/the-case-against-cardinal-george-pell-new-details-emerge/
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? I am not denying things might of happened inside the Church. Our priests still have Spiritual fathers and must confess to them their sins regularly. They are men, and have all the flaws of man and are also fallen and can sin. When they perform rituals and the sacraments, it's not them as priests or men that perform the holy miracles. It's the Holy Spirit that also comes down into the Church when the Ossanna hymn are recited along with the creed. We must bow our heads and be on our knees. There was once an Orthodox Liturgy. The priest and chanters started the Ossanna Hymn and priest fell and died. Why? Because the Holy Spirit came and took him away. It was time. But I am nowhere near convinced that Pell was a Pedophile either. It doesn't make any sense that he is a Pedophile. It's not even logical. There have been lots of people that have done bad things inside a Church. Murderes, robbers and even rapists too. People who have done bad things and have since repented as well and found God. Glory be to him. But these bad things were not in our Faith's name. It's like saying all Muslims are terrorists. We know how you don't like this but now you are attributing evil with an entire religion of 1 Billion people. In our faith, the robber to the right of Christ joined Our Lord in Paradise that very same day. The very founder of our Church was a mass murderer. Apostle Paul was responsible for the murder of thousands of Christians. Then he was visited by our Lord who asked Paul: "Why do you persecute me?" Paul fell to his knees and asked for forgiveness and the Lord asked Paul to give up everything and to follow Him. Follow him he did. To the end, and until his time was to be burned alive upside down on a crucifix in Rome.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. But these bad things were not in our Faith's name. It's like saying all Muslims are terrorists. We know how you don't like this but now you are attributing evil with an entire religion of 1 Billion people. I have never done this and this is a terrible attempt at a strawman. All I said that there isn't an attack on the Church and that people want justice for the crimes committed by priests against children. That is NOT attributing evil to an entire religion, that is demanding justice for the victims of child abuse.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denyng that the Church +x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denying that the church has harmed 10s of thousands of people. Such a statement is of course ludicrous and I sincerely deny it. I have never however denied that bad things have occured inside the Church. As I said, our founder was a mass murdered (Apostle Paul). In our faith, the robber to the right of Christ joined Our Lord in Paradise that very same day. The very founder of our Church was a mass murderer. Apostle Paul was responsible for the murder of thousands of Christians. Then he was visited by our Lord who asked Paul: "Why do you persecute me?" Paul fell to his knees and asked for forgiveness and the Lord asked Paul to give up everything and to follow Him. Follow him he did. To the end, and until his time was to be burned alive upside down on a crucifix in Rome. Our religion changed the very foundations of Western Civilization and the entire Roman Empire. This simply does not occur without the Holy Spirit or by a fictional belief system.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denyng that the Church +x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denying that the church has harmed 10s of thousands of people. Such a statement is of course ludicrous and I sincerely deny it. I have never however denied that bad things have occured inside the Church. As I said, our founder was a mass murdered (Apostle Paul). In our faith, the robber to the right of Christ joined Our Lord in Paradise that very same day. The very founder of our Church was a mass murderer. Apostle Paul was responsible for the murder of thousands of Christians. Then he was visited by our Lord who asked Paul: "Why do you persecute me?" Paul fell to his knees and asked for forgiveness and the Lord asked Paul to give up everything and to follow Him. Follow him he did. To the end, and until his time was to be burned alive upside down on a crucifix in Rome. Why didn't you just say you deny it, instead of writing all that religious crap no one gives a shit about and has absolutely no relevance whatsoever. But you still contradicted yourself. You said you haven't denied anything, yet have denied twice that members of the church has harmed 10's of thousands of people which is a ridiculous thing to deny.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denyng that the Church +x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denying that the church has harmed 10s of thousands of people. Such a statement is of course ludicrous and I sincerely deny it. I have never however denied that bad things have occured inside the Church. As I said, our founder was a mass murdered (Apostle Paul). In our faith, the robber to the right of Christ joined Our Lord in Paradise that very same day. The very founder of our Church was a mass murderer. Apostle Paul was responsible for the murder of thousands of Christians. Then he was visited by our Lord who asked Paul: "Why do you persecute me?" Paul fell to his knees and asked for forgiveness and the Lord asked Paul to give up everything and to follow Him. Follow him he did. To the end, and until his time was to be burned alive upside down on a crucifix in Rome. Why didn't you just say you deny it, instead of writing all that religious crap no one gives a shit about. It's not religious crap. It's the truth. By saying it is crap, you are admitting that you are not grounded, logical, and are also fearful of the truth and don't like reading it. It's also historical FACT. The things I talk about did occur. And millions of people around the world care about this Truth and Logos (Word). Your entire judicial and political system is based on it too.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denyng that the Church +x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denying that the church has harmed 10s of thousands of people. Such a statement is of course ludicrous and I sincerely deny it. I have never however denied that bad things have occured inside the Church. As I said, our founder was a mass murdered (Apostle Paul). In our faith, the robber to the right of Christ joined Our Lord in Paradise that very same day. The very founder of our Church was a mass murderer. Apostle Paul was responsible for the murder of thousands of Christians. Then he was visited by our Lord who asked Paul: "Why do you persecute me?" Paul fell to his knees and asked for forgiveness and the Lord asked Paul to give up everything and to follow Him. Follow him he did. To the end, and until his time was to be burned alive upside down on a crucifix in Rome. Why didn't you just say you deny it, instead of writing all that religious crap no one gives a shit about. It's not religious crap. It's the truth. By saying it is crap, you are admitting that you are not grounded, logical, and are also fearful of the truth and don't like reading it. And millions of people around the world care about this Truth and Logos (Word). Your entire judicial and political system is based on it too. It isn't relevant to the conversation so it is crap. I don't believe in God or paradise or whatever but that's a debate for another time and also irrelevant to this conversation.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denyng that the Church +x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denying that the church has harmed 10s of thousands of people. Such a statement is of course ludicrous and I sincerely deny it. I have never however denied that bad things have occured inside the Church. As I said, our founder was a mass murdered (Apostle Paul). In our faith, the robber to the right of Christ joined Our Lord in Paradise that very same day. The very founder of our Church was a mass murderer. Apostle Paul was responsible for the murder of thousands of Christians. Then he was visited by our Lord who asked Paul: "Why do you persecute me?" Paul fell to his knees and asked for forgiveness and the Lord asked Paul to give up everything and to follow Him. Follow him he did. To the end, and until his time was to be burned alive upside down on a crucifix in Rome. Why didn't you just say you deny it, instead of writing all that religious crap no one gives a shit about. It's not religious crap. It's the truth. By saying it is crap, you are admitting that you are not grounded, logical, and are also fearful of the truth and don't like reading it. And millions of people around the world care about this Truth and Logos (Word). Your entire judicial and political system is based on it too. It isn't relevant to the conversation so it is crap. I don't believe in God or paradise or whatever but that's a debate for another time and also irrelevant to this conversation. No it is perfectly relevant. You are on a crusade, blaming a religion of some 1 billion people. Our religion as I told you was founded by a mass murderer. That is very relevant. It's relevent to understand the love and forgiveness within our hearts. Something you thumb your nose at. The Lord forgave this mass murderer and asked him to follow Him, and he formed The Ancient Faith (now Catholic and Orthodox). Our word is full of love and forgiveness. This is the magnitude of our Lords greatness and love. What we must aspire to. Our Lord loves everyone. Everyone.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denyng that the Church +x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denying that the church has harmed 10s of thousands of people. Such a statement is of course ludicrous and I sincerely deny it. I have never however denied that bad things have occured inside the Church. As I said, our founder was a mass murdered (Apostle Paul). In our faith, the robber to the right of Christ joined Our Lord in Paradise that very same day. The very founder of our Church was a mass murderer. Apostle Paul was responsible for the murder of thousands of Christians. Then he was visited by our Lord who asked Paul: "Why do you persecute me?" Paul fell to his knees and asked for forgiveness and the Lord asked Paul to give up everything and to follow Him. Follow him he did. To the end, and until his time was to be burned alive upside down on a crucifix in Rome. Why didn't you just say you deny it, instead of writing all that religious crap no one gives a shit about. It's not religious crap. It's the truth. By saying it is crap, you are admitting that you are not grounded, logical, and are also fearful of the truth and don't like reading it. And millions of people around the world care about this Truth and Logos (Word). Your entire judicial and political system is based on it too. It isn't relevant to the conversation so it is crap. I don't believe in God or paradise or whatever but that's a debate for another time and also irrelevant to this conversation. No it is perfectly relevant. You are on a crusade, blaming a religion of some 1 billion people. Our religion as I told you was founded by a mass murderer. That is very relevant. It's relevent to understand the love and forgiveness within our hearts. Something you thumb your nose at. Where have I blamed the religion? Who gives a shit if your religion was formed by a mass murderer. I don't care and it has no relevance whatsoever. I do understand love and forgiveness. (You bring this up is an attempt at a deflection) I don't need religion to teach me that.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denyng that the Church +x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denying that the church has harmed 10s of thousands of people. Such a statement is of course ludicrous and I sincerely deny it. I have never however denied that bad things have occured inside the Church. As I said, our founder was a mass murdered (Apostle Paul). In our faith, the robber to the right of Christ joined Our Lord in Paradise that very same day. The very founder of our Church was a mass murderer. Apostle Paul was responsible for the murder of thousands of Christians. Then he was visited by our Lord who asked Paul: "Why do you persecute me?" Paul fell to his knees and asked for forgiveness and the Lord asked Paul to give up everything and to follow Him. Follow him he did. To the end, and until his time was to be burned alive upside down on a crucifix in Rome. Why didn't you just say you deny it, instead of writing all that religious crap no one gives a shit about. It's not religious crap. It's the truth. By saying it is crap, you are admitting that you are not grounded, logical, and are also fearful of the truth and don't like reading it. It's also historical FACT. The things I talk about did occur. There's literally no evidence of a God or a paradise existing so IT IS NOT HISTORICAL FACT. It is myth and legend.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denyng that the Church +x+x+x+xYes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. The evidence of child abuse in the Church is irrefutable. How anyone can deny it is beyond me. It's just as bad as holocaust denial. There isn't a crusade against the Church. I don't know whether you are that dumb enough to believe that or if you are trolling. The people just want justice for crimes committed by its priests. Where did I deny anything? +x+x+x+xGuys don't waste your time on this flop, he just loves to trash talk Christianity as much as he can, then you make one little comment based off an opinion on football that he doesn't agree with you on and he'll cry and carry on like a bitch non stop. This dog hates Christianity that bad he'll simply blame everything on Christians and deep down inside he hates anyone who believes in God because according to him no one should believe. In his ideal world everyone would be a flop like him, otherwise they'd deserve to get locked up, oh but may I add he hates dictators and believes people should be free to believe in what they want, well except for Christianity. Yes, the guy has an agenda because he blatantly disregards all the contributions from Christian Religions such as the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Lutherans and Orthodox. If you literally ban them, then you wipe out a lot more than they care to think or worry about. Australian Education will be in tatters for a start. I don't disregard them at all. Are you seriously denying that the church hasn't abused 10's of thousands of people over many decades? What I find incredible is that you can sit there with a straight face and go 'well who cares about all that look at all the good they do'. Talk about cognitive dissonance. And I never said they should be banned. I said they should be taxed Yes I am denying that the Catholic Church has abused 10s of thousands of people. Yes I am denying that the church has harmed 10s of thousands of people. Such a statement is of course ludicrous and I sincerely deny it. I have never however denied that bad things have occured inside the Church. As I said, our founder was a mass murdered (Apostle Paul). In our faith, the robber to the right of Christ joined Our Lord in Paradise that very same day. The very founder of our Church was a mass murderer. Apostle Paul was responsible for the murder of thousands of Christians. Then he was visited by our Lord who asked Paul: "Why do you persecute me?" Paul fell to his knees and asked for forgiveness and the Lord asked Paul to give up everything and to follow Him. Follow him he did. To the end, and until his time was to be burned alive upside down on a crucifix in Rome. Why didn't you just say you deny it, instead of writing all that religious crap no one gives a shit about. It's not religious crap. It's the truth. By saying it is crap, you are admitting that you are not grounded, logical, and are also fearful of the truth and don't like reading it. It's also historical FACT. The things I talk about did occur. There's literally no evidence of a God or a paradise existing so IT IS NOT HISTORICAL FACT. It is myth and legend. There is a lot of evidence. You are just blind and have your eyes closed. The evidence is also available for you to see, when you open your eyes, mind and your heart.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
I hope that one day you do open your eyes and heart and strive to learn. You have nothing to lose. Go to Israel and follow the steps of the Lord, feel the power, the love, and learn the history. It is the greatest advice anyone can give you. Let go of the earthly things and yearn to be a spiritual person. Psychiatry is a powerful word and has much greater meaning than most people know or even care about. It's a Medical Science - with religious connotations. Psyche in Ancient Greek means soul. Today we talk about mental health but we have lost the meaning of what is necessary to be mentally healthy. We have even lost its meaning. It's the health of the soul. Our Lord is the greatest Physician to have walked the planet. Today we have record levels of suicide and mental illness.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI hope that one day you do open your eyes and heart and strive to learn. You have nothing to lose. Go to Israel and follow the steps of the Lord, feel the power, the love, and learn the history. It is the greatest advice anyone can give you. Let go of the earthly things and yearn to be a spiritual person. Psychiatry is a powerful word and has much greater meaning than most people know or even care about. It's a Medical Science - with religious connotations. Psyche in Ancient Greek means soul. Today we talk about mental health but we have lost the meaning of what is necessary to be mentally healthy. We have even lost its meaning. It's the health of the soul. Our Lord is the greatest Physician to have walked the planet. Today we have record levels of suicide and mental illness. I don't give a fuck. Stop preaching your bullshit to me.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI hope that one day you do open your eyes and heart and strive to learn. You have nothing to lose. Go to Israel and follow the steps of the Lord, feel the power, the love, and learn the history. It is the greatest advice anyone can give you. Let go of the earthly things and yearn to be a spiritual person. Psychiatry is a powerful word and has much greater meaning than most people know or even care about. It's a Medical Science - with religious connotations. Psyche in Ancient Greek means soul. Today we talk about mental health but we have lost the meaning of what is necessary to be mentally healthy. We have even lost its meaning. It's the health of the soul. Our Lord is the greatest Physician to have walked the planet. Today we have record levels of suicide and mental illness. I don't give a fuck. Stop preaching your bullshit to me. No one is preaching to you or trying to change you. You need to do this yourself and want to change. It would be incredibly remiss of me if I do not show you love no matter how disrespectful and obnoxious you are. That is what the Lord teaches us.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI hope that one day you do open your eyes and heart and strive to learn. You have nothing to lose. Go to Israel and follow the steps of the Lord, feel the power, the love, and learn the history. It is the greatest advice anyone can give you. Let go of the earthly things and yearn to be a spiritual person. Psychiatry is a powerful word and has much greater meaning than most people know or even care about. It's a Medical Science - with religious connotations. Psyche in Ancient Greek means soul. Today we talk about mental health but we have lost the meaning of what is necessary to be mentally healthy. We have even lost its meaning. It's the health of the soul. Our Lord is the greatest Physician to have walked the planet. Today we have record levels of suicide and mental illness. I don't give a fuck. Stop preaching your bullshit to me. No one is preaching to you or trying to change you. You need to do this yourself and want to change. It would be incredibly remiss of me if I do not show you love no matter how disrespectful and obnoxious you are. That is what the Lord teaches us. The irony of you calling someone disrespectful and obnoxious. You have been preaching to me and Muz on multiple occasions in this thread.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xI hope that one day you do open your eyes and heart and strive to learn. You have nothing to lose. Go to Israel and follow the steps of the Lord, feel the power, the love, and learn the history. It is the greatest advice anyone can give you. Let go of the earthly things and yearn to be a spiritual person. Psychiatry is a powerful word and has much greater meaning than most people know or even care about. It's a Medical Science - with religious connotations. Psyche in Ancient Greek means soul. Today we talk about mental health but we have lost the meaning of what is necessary to be mentally healthy. We have even lost its meaning. It's the health of the soul. Our Lord is the greatest Physician to have walked the planet. Today we have record levels of suicide and mental illness. I don't give a fuck. Stop preaching your bullshit to me. No one is preaching to you or trying to change you. You need to do this yourself and want to change. It would be incredibly remiss of me if I do not show you love no matter how disrespectful and obnoxious you are. That is what the Lord teaches us. The irony of you calling someone disrespectful and obnoxious. You have been preaching to me and Muz on multiple occasions in this thread. Yes you are disrespectful, and obnoxious. You are also full of hatred and sarcasm. But I am still suppose to extend a warm and loving hand towards you and I will do that without reservation. Love your enemy...
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xI hope that one day you do open your eyes and heart and strive to learn. You have nothing to lose. Go to Israel and follow the steps of the Lord, feel the power, the love, and learn the history. It is the greatest advice anyone can give you. Let go of the earthly things and yearn to be a spiritual person. Psychiatry is a powerful word and has much greater meaning than most people know or even care about. It's a Medical Science - with religious connotations. Psyche in Ancient Greek means soul. Today we talk about mental health but we have lost the meaning of what is necessary to be mentally healthy. We have even lost its meaning. It's the health of the soul. Our Lord is the greatest Physician to have walked the planet. Today we have record levels of suicide and mental illness. I don't give a fuck. Stop preaching your bullshit to me. No one is preaching to you or trying to change you. You need to do this yourself and want to change. It would be incredibly remiss of me if I do not show you love no matter how disrespectful and obnoxious you are. That is what the Lord teaches us. The irony of you calling someone disrespectful and obnoxious. You have been preaching to me and Muz on multiple occasions in this thread. Yes you are disrespectful, and obnoxious. You are also full of hatred and sarcasm. But I am still suppose to extend a warm and loving hand towards you and I will do that without reservation. Love your enemy... I only disrespect and hate people who strawman and move the goal posts because they can't win a debate fairly. I also hate pedo apologists and pedo defenders.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xI hope that one day you do open your eyes and heart and strive to learn. You have nothing to lose. Go to Israel and follow the steps of the Lord, feel the power, the love, and learn the history. It is the greatest advice anyone can give you. Let go of the earthly things and yearn to be a spiritual person. Psychiatry is a powerful word and has much greater meaning than most people know or even care about. It's a Medical Science - with religious connotations. Psyche in Ancient Greek means soul. Today we talk about mental health but we have lost the meaning of what is necessary to be mentally healthy. We have even lost its meaning. It's the health of the soul. Our Lord is the greatest Physician to have walked the planet. Today we have record levels of suicide and mental illness. I don't give a fuck. Stop preaching your bullshit to me. No one is preaching to you or trying to change you. You need to do this yourself and want to change. It would be incredibly remiss of me if I do not show you love no matter how disrespectful and obnoxious you are. That is what the Lord teaches us. The irony of you calling someone disrespectful and obnoxious. You have been preaching to me and Muz on multiple occasions in this thread. Yes you are disrespectful, and obnoxious. You are also full of hatred and sarcasm. But I am still suppose to extend a warm and loving hand towards you and I will do that without reservation. Love your enemy... I only disrespect and hate people who strawman and move the goal posts because they can't win a debate fairly. I also hate pedo apologists and pedo defenders. There are no straw-men here mate. Just pure love towards you and prayer! Even if you do continue to make false accusations against us.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xI hope that one day you do open your eyes and heart and strive to learn. You have nothing to lose. Go to Israel and follow the steps of the Lord, feel the power, the love, and learn the history. It is the greatest advice anyone can give you. Let go of the earthly things and yearn to be a spiritual person. Psychiatry is a powerful word and has much greater meaning than most people know or even care about. It's a Medical Science - with religious connotations. Psyche in Ancient Greek means soul. Today we talk about mental health but we have lost the meaning of what is necessary to be mentally healthy. We have even lost its meaning. It's the health of the soul. Our Lord is the greatest Physician to have walked the planet. Today we have record levels of suicide and mental illness. I don't give a fuck. Stop preaching your bullshit to me. No one is preaching to you or trying to change you. You need to do this yourself and want to change. It would be incredibly remiss of me if I do not show you love no matter how disrespectful and obnoxious you are. That is what the Lord teaches us. The irony of you calling someone disrespectful and obnoxious. You have been preaching to me and Muz on multiple occasions in this thread. Yes you are disrespectful, and obnoxious. You are also full of hatred and sarcasm. But I am still suppose to extend a warm and loving hand towards you and I will do that without reservation. Love your enemy... I only disrespect and hate people who strawman and move the goal posts because they can't win a debate fairly. I also hate pedo apologists and pedo defenders. There are no straw-men here mate. Just pure love towards you and prayer! Even if you do continue to make false accusations against us. I wasn't talking about here. I was talking about people I hate. And I don't want love and prayers from someone who is defending a convicted pedo.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xI hope that one day you do open your eyes and heart and strive to learn. You have nothing to lose. Go to Israel and follow the steps of the Lord, feel the power, the love, and learn the history. It is the greatest advice anyone can give you. Let go of the earthly things and yearn to be a spiritual person. Psychiatry is a powerful word and has much greater meaning than most people know or even care about. It's a Medical Science - with religious connotations. Psyche in Ancient Greek means soul. Today we talk about mental health but we have lost the meaning of what is necessary to be mentally healthy. We have even lost its meaning. It's the health of the soul. Our Lord is the greatest Physician to have walked the planet. Today we have record levels of suicide and mental illness. I don't give a fuck. Stop preaching your bullshit to me. No one is preaching to you or trying to change you. You need to do this yourself and want to change. It would be incredibly remiss of me if I do not show you love no matter how disrespectful and obnoxious you are. That is what the Lord teaches us. The irony of you calling someone disrespectful and obnoxious. You have been preaching to me and Muz on multiple occasions in this thread. Yes you are disrespectful, and obnoxious. You are also full of hatred and sarcasm. But I am still suppose to extend a warm and loving hand towards you and I will do that without reservation. Love your enemy... I only disrespect and hate people who strawman and move the goal posts because they can't win a debate fairly. I also hate pedo apologists and pedo defenders. There are no straw-men here mate. Just pure love towards you and prayer! Even if you do continue to make false accusations against us. I wasn't talking about here. I was talking about people I hate. And I don't want love and prayers from someone who is defending a convicted pedo. Yes you do! Everyone needs it including me. Just shoosh because if someone is prepared to pray for you, they are doing a very good thing. You should remove the hate from your life. It will consume you in the end. Also desist with making false accusations. It's not good.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Or maybe you'll simply claim they are just too good at covering up right? That sounds more like you.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
You are using the Lord's name in vain!
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
I'll agree with you sub007 on the covering up being just as bad as being the abuser.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI'll agree with you sub007 on the covering up being just as bad as being the abuser. That's what I don't understand about Aikhme. At least you have the decency to acknowledge shit things have happened in the past and they can't be excused. Ol' mate just sits there obliviously and goes 'nope, didn't happen.'
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI'll agree with you sub007 on the covering up being just as bad as being the abuser. That's what I don't understand about Aikhme. At least you have the decency to acknowledge shit things have happened in the past and they can't be excused. Ol' mate just sits there obliviously and goes 'nope, didn't happen.' Because Aikhme is either a delusional idiot or a sad troll who has nothing better to do with his life.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI'll agree with you sub007 on the covering up being just as bad as being the abuser. That's what I don't understand about Aikhme. At least you have the decency to acknowledge shit things have happened in the past and they can't be excused. Ol' mate just sits there obliviously and goes 'nope, didn't happen.' Yeh but I don't think he says no covering up or molesting has happened, what he argues is that not every single case against a priest is true. Just as much as there have been disgusting priests who have done wrong, equally there's been disgusting people who make up lies, so if there is a flaw in someone's story it's okay to question it without being labeled a paedophile synthesizer. Otherwise if we believe every single person coming out saying they got molested, then we are basically stereotyping every single priest as a child molester. As for me personally on the latest George Pell case I honestly find the victims claims hard to believe only based on the evidence he's given, and I don't think I should be criticised on having this opinion, especially with the court matter not fully delt with as of yet considering the appeal. It's the same thing with celebrities who have been convicted of rape. I'm sure many have raped woman and even gotten away with it, but this doesn't mean every single claim is true, in fact there are more lies told on ratio on this matter and again it would be wrong to look down on all celebrities as evil rapists because of the actions of the few who have been rightfully convicted.
|
|
|