Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xArguably the best 3 QLD clubs not interested? A worry for the NST. Not in the NPL era they aren't, best 4 clubs in the NPL Qld (particularly when the league opened up) have been Power, Lions, Olympic and GC Knights and at least 3 of those have put in an EOI and I wouldn't be surprised if Lions did put in an EOI. Strikers are an FQPL1 team as are Fire with their best days being pre NPL and City are an up and down side who look like they will have a good year but were in FQPL1 2 years ago. I would expect 2 Qld sides to make the NSD and the smart money would be on Power and GC Knights, biggest hurdle they would have is stadiums, Power can overcome that by playing out of Dolphin Oval, I'm not sure where Knights could play to overcome the shortcomings of their home. If Lions (the biggest and best club in Qld) applies for the NST it will be them plus most likely Power - IMO If Lions don't apply then that tells us they looks at the economics of it project, and thought this is not gonna work? Considering they started Roar in the A-league, they'll know a thing or two how these "professional leagues" can go Yep. Food for thought. It's not just Lions either that may be making those considerations (I added another paragraph to my post above that crossed with your one here in relation to this) +x+x+xArguably the best 3 QLD clubs not interested? A worry for the NST. Not in the NPL era they aren't, best 4 clubs in the NPL Qld (particularly when the league opened up) have been Power, Lions, Olympic and GC Knights and at least 3 of those have put in an EOI and I wouldn't be surprised if Lions did put in an EOI. Strikers are an FQPL1 team as are Fire with their best days being pre NPL and City are an up and down side who look like they will have a good year but were in FQPL1 2 years ago. I would expect 2 Qld sides to make the NSD and the smart money would be on Power and GC Knights, biggest hurdle they would have is stadiums, Power can overcome that by playing out of Dolphin Oval, I'm not sure where Knights could play to overcome the shortcomings of their home. If memory serves me correctly, the last 3 Qld clubs that looked to applying for the A-League were Lions, Brisbane City and Strikers. They must have had the confidence, credentials and resources then, not to mention the history - but for some reason have not put up their hand (so far) despite a less demanding NST. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/may/25/fifteen-a-league-expansion-bids-confirmed-on-deadline-dayNo strikers or lions on this list. The Freo and West Adelaide bids still make me laugh. The 15 bids ACT: Canberra New South Wales: South-West Sydney (Liverpool), Southern Expansion (Sutherland-St George Illawarra), Wollongong Wolves, Macarthur (Campbelltown) Queensland: Brisbane City, Gold Coast United, Western Pride/Ipswich South Australia: West Adelaide Tasmania: State-wide Victoria: Team 11 (South-East Melbourne), South Melbourne, Western Melbourne, Belgravia Leisure Western Australia: Fremantle City
The years have passed so quickly. Southern expansion. Man I totally forgot about that shit 🤣 Was Southern expansion the one backed by Chinese property developers? and Craig Foster and technological undergarments that would let you enter the stadium and swipe your left but cheek to order a beer or something.........
|
|
|
|
someguyjc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xso SU58 have no chance in hell in being accepted because of the australia cup 22 final being still fresh in the mind Canberra deakin and Melbourne Knights won't be accepted for the Ustase loving supporters GCKnights need to be clean AF to be in as well (or merge with GC United) It does not look good for the picnic tableclothers as solo cubs Your comment itself is racist to all croatians as your painting everyone and every club in the same brush. I will guarantee you that 1 if not 2 croatian clubs will be accepted into the NSD. Exactly. Melbourne Knights will most likely be one of the stronger bids and it would be difficult to justify not letting them in if they tick all of the required boxes. That being said, if the FA are trying to decide between SU58 and another club, and they both have a similar spec'd application, I reckon the fan issues at the Australia Cup final may come into play. I also reckon the FA will actively limit the number of clubs they select that are associated with a single nationality. For example, I don't think we will see 4 Italian clubs, or 4 Greek clubs, or 4 Cro clubs, etc. I also reckon we won't see two clubs associated with the same nationality from the same state. Not saying that it's right, I'm just saying I reckon the FA will have that line of thinking. Either way, in a FA owned and operated league, all clubs are going to be held responsible for any questionable fan behavior. They will need to be prepared to accept sanctions, points deductions, etc if their fans behave in a way that the FA don't approve of.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xso SU58 have no chance in hell in being accepted because of the australia cup 22 final being still fresh in the mind Canberra deakin and Melbourne Knights won't be accepted for the Ustase loving supporters GCKnights need to be clean AF to be in as well (or merge with GC United) It does not look good for the picnic tableclothers as solo cubs Your comment itself is racist to all croatians as your painting everyone and every club in the same brush. I will guarantee you that 1 if not 2 croatian clubs will be accepted into the NSD. Exactly. Melbourne Knights will most likely be one of the stronger bids and it would be difficult to justify not letting them in if they tick all of the required boxes. That being said, if the FA are trying to decide between SU58 and another club, and they both have a similar spec'd application, I reckon the fan issues at the Australia Cup final may come into play. I also reckon the FA will actively limit the number of clubs they select that are associated with a single nationality. For example, I don't think we will see 4 Italian clubs, or 4 Greek clubs, or 4 Cro clubs, etc. I also reckon we won't see two clubs associated with the same nationality from the same state. Not saying that it's right, I'm just saying I reckon the FA will have that line of thinking. Either way, in a FA owned and operated league, all clubs are going to be held responsible for any questionable fan behavior. They will need to be prepared to accept sanctions, points deductions, etc if their fans behave in a way that the FA don't approve of. Thats not really fair mate... Why cant we have suspended sanctions and pretend "life bans" for fans like the franchises?
|
|
|
someguyjc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xso SU58 have no chance in hell in being accepted because of the australia cup 22 final being still fresh in the mind Canberra deakin and Melbourne Knights won't be accepted for the Ustase loving supporters GCKnights need to be clean AF to be in as well (or merge with GC United) It does not look good for the picnic tableclothers as solo cubs Your comment itself is racist to all croatians as your painting everyone and every club in the same brush. I will guarantee you that 1 if not 2 croatian clubs will be accepted into the NSD. Exactly. Melbourne Knights will most likely be one of the stronger bids and it would be difficult to justify not letting them in if they tick all of the required boxes. That being said, if the FA are trying to decide between SU58 and another club, and they both have a similar spec'd application, I reckon the fan issues at the Australia Cup final may come into play. I also reckon the FA will actively limit the number of clubs they select that are associated with a single nationality. For example, I don't think we will see 4 Italian clubs, or 4 Greek clubs, or 4 Cro clubs, etc. I also reckon we won't see two clubs associated with the same nationality from the same state. Not saying that it's right, I'm just saying I reckon the FA will have that line of thinking. Either way, in a FA owned and operated league, all clubs are going to be held responsible for any questionable fan behavior. They will need to be prepared to accept sanctions, points deductions, etc if their fans behave in a way that the FA don't approve of. Thats not really fair mate... Why cant we have suspended sanctions and pretend "life bans" for fans like the franchises? Well that's what I meant. They'll need to be prepared to accept a threat of sanctions, points deductions, etc.
|
|
|
numklpkgulftumch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Rumour Mill
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xQueenslandPeninsula Power Olympic FC Sunshine Coast Fire Gold Coast Knights Wynnum Wolves Brisbane United (composite club) will confirm when known and not sure if this part of Brisbane Strikers or if Strikers have applied. NSWAPIA Marconi Sydney Olympic Sydney United Wollongong Wolves VictoriaHeidelberg United Melbourne Knights South Melbourne Hume City Preston Lions Brunswick Juventus Caroline Springs George Cross TasmaniaSouth Hobart South AustraliaAdelaide City Great start with EOI entries, really interesting is the number of Club in Queensland with the ambition to reach a higher level. Their aspiration deserves a lot of credit, whether they make it or not. Behind these Clubs, some clubs I've spoken to realise they aren't ready, they do want to reach the NST level. To achieve that goal they are already putting together 5 year strategic plans together. It's becoming evident that having this new national platform is infuenceing clubs to plan, invest and aspire. Looks like my mail on Brisbane United could be on the cards, numklpkgulftumch.
|
|
|
numklpkgulftumch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xQueenslandPeninsula Power Olympic FC Sunshine Coast Fire Gold Coast Knights Wynnum Wolves Brisbane United (composite club) will confirm when known and not sure if this part of Brisbane Strikers or if Strikers have applied. NSWAPIA Marconi Sydney Olympic Sydney United Wollongong Wolves VictoriaHeidelberg United Melbourne Knights South Melbourne Hume City Preston Lions Brunswick Juventus Caroline Springs George Cross TasmaniaSouth Hobart South AustraliaAdelaide City Great start with EOI entries, really interesting is the number of Club in Queensland with the ambition to reach a higher level. Their aspiration deserves a lot of credit, whether they make it or not. Behind these Clubs, some clubs I've spoken to realise they aren't ready, they do want to reach the NST level. To achieve that goal they are already putting together 5 year strategic plans together. It's becoming evident that having this new national platform is infuenceing clubs to plan, invest and aspire. Looks like my mail on Brisbane United could be on the cards, numklpkgulftumch. I'd be interested to know at what stage in the process do the full list of current applications gets published. Or is it only at the final declaration ?
|
|
|
someguyjc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xQueenslandPeninsula Power Olympic FC Sunshine Coast Fire Gold Coast Knights Wynnum Wolves Brisbane United (composite club) will confirm when known and not sure if this part of Brisbane Strikers or if Strikers have applied. NSWAPIA Marconi Sydney Olympic Sydney United Wollongong Wolves VictoriaHeidelberg United Melbourne Knights South Melbourne Hume City Preston Lions Brunswick Juventus Caroline Springs George Cross TasmaniaSouth Hobart South AustraliaAdelaide City Great start with EOI entries, really interesting is the number of Club in Queensland with the ambition to reach a higher level. Their aspiration deserves a lot of credit, whether they make it or not. Behind these Clubs, some clubs I've spoken to realise they aren't ready, they do want to reach the NST level. To achieve that goal they are already putting together 5 year strategic plans together. It's becoming evident that having this new national platform is infuenceing clubs to plan, invest and aspire. Looks like my mail on Brisbane United could be on the cards, numklpkgulftumch. I'd be interested to know at what stage in the process do the full list of current applications gets published. Or is it only at the final declaration ? They may not publish a full list of applicants, but I would imagine they would likely publish the shortlisted applications. This would be in April sometime.
|
|
|
Glenardo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 137,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xso SU58 have no chance in hell in being accepted because of the australia cup 22 final being still fresh in the mind Canberra deakin and Melbourne Knights won't be accepted for the Ustase loving supporters GCKnights need to be clean AF to be in as well (or merge with GC United) It does not look good for the picnic tableclothers as solo cubs Your comment itself is racist to all croatians as your painting everyone and every club in the same brush. I will guarantee you that 1 if not 2 croatian clubs will be accepted into the NSD. Exactly. Melbourne Knights will most likely be one of the stronger bids and it would be difficult to justify not letting them in if they tick all of the required boxes. That being said, if the FA are trying to decide between SU58 and another club, and they both have a similar spec'd application, I reckon the fan issues at the Australia Cup final may come into play. I also reckon the FA will actively limit the number of clubs they select that are associated with a single nationality. For example, I don't think we will see 4 Italian clubs, or 4 Greek clubs, or 4 Cro clubs, etc. I also reckon we won't see two clubs associated with the same nationality from the same state. Not saying that it's right, I'm just saying I reckon the FA will have that line of thinking. Either way, in a FA owned and operated league, all clubs are going to be held responsible for any questionable fan behavior. They will need to be prepared to accept sanctions, points deductions, etc if their fans behave in a way that the FA don't approve of. Probably a fairly accurate assessment. But agreed, imo the ethnicity of the clubs founders should be irrelevant if we’re trying to move into a post NCIP era as a unified sport. We can’t really afford to be excluding some of our strongest clubs on that basis tbh, there’s already a fairly limited number of clubs which can probably actually sustain this. If its the case that 2 of those clubs in Melbourne happen to be “Greek clubs” and 2 of those clubs in Sydney happen to be “Italian”, so be it. We need our biggest clubs in this for it be given its best chance of success. Same goes for geographic location
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
absolutely and in todays way of "inclusion" and all the FA would need to be veryvery careful on the grounds why X large Club that measures up to all the requirements applicable being incl in the NST sure will need to have covered their backs (with their lawyers advise)........... Discrimination today is a lawsuit melting pot.
Love Football
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xArguably the best 3 QLD clubs not interested? A worry for the NST. Not in the NPL era they aren't, best 4 clubs in the NPL Qld (particularly when the league opened up) have been Power, Lions, Olympic and GC Knights and at least 3 of those have put in an EOI and I wouldn't be surprised if Lions did put in an EOI. Strikers are an FQPL1 team as are Fire with their best days being pre NPL and City are an up and down side who look like they will have a good year but were in FQPL1 2 years ago. I would expect 2 Qld sides to make the NSD and the smart money would be on Power and GC Knights, biggest hurdle they would have is stadiums, Power can overcome that by playing out of Dolphin Oval, I'm not sure where Knights could play to overcome the shortcomings of their home. If Lions (the biggest and best club in Qld) applies for the NST it will be them plus most likely Power - IMO If Lions don't apply then that tells us they looks at the economics of it project, and thought this is not gonna work? Considering they started Roar in the A-league, they'll know a thing or two how these "professional leagues" can go Yep. Food for thought. It's not just Lions either that may be making those considerations (I added another paragraph to my post above that crossed with your one here in relation to this) +x+x+xArguably the best 3 QLD clubs not interested? A worry for the NST. Not in the NPL era they aren't, best 4 clubs in the NPL Qld (particularly when the league opened up) have been Power, Lions, Olympic and GC Knights and at least 3 of those have put in an EOI and I wouldn't be surprised if Lions did put in an EOI. Strikers are an FQPL1 team as are Fire with their best days being pre NPL and City are an up and down side who look like they will have a good year but were in FQPL1 2 years ago. I would expect 2 Qld sides to make the NSD and the smart money would be on Power and GC Knights, biggest hurdle they would have is stadiums, Power can overcome that by playing out of Dolphin Oval, I'm not sure where Knights could play to overcome the shortcomings of their home. If memory serves me correctly, the last 3 Qld clubs that looked to applying for the A-League were Lions, Brisbane City and Strikers. They must have had the confidence, credentials and resources then, not to mention the history - but for some reason have not put up their hand (so far) despite a less demanding NST. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/may/25/fifteen-a-league-expansion-bids-confirmed-on-deadline-dayNo strikers or lions on this list. The Freo and West Adelaide bids still make me laugh. The 15 bids ACT: Canberra New South Wales: South-West Sydney (Liverpool), Southern Expansion (Sutherland-St George Illawarra), Wollongong Wolves, Macarthur (Campbelltown) Queensland: Brisbane City, Gold Coast United, Western Pride/Ipswich South Australia: West Adelaide Tasmania: State-wide Victoria: Team 11 (South-East Melbourne), South Melbourne, Western Melbourne, Belgravia Leisure Western Australia: Fremantle City
Fremantle City... :laugh: They just used this as a ploy to poach junior NPL players from other clubs in WA. " Come play for Fremantle, your son will be playing for us in the A-League in a few years. See, we even have a website saying so!". Sadly, there were parents who fell for it.
|
|
|
Butler99
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xArguably the best 3 QLD clubs not interested? A worry for the NST. Not in the NPL era they aren't, best 4 clubs in the NPL Qld (particularly when the league opened up) have been Power, Lions, Olympic and GC Knights and at least 3 of those have put in an EOI and I wouldn't be surprised if Lions did put in an EOI. Strikers are an FQPL1 team as are Fire with their best days being pre NPL and City are an up and down side who look like they will have a good year but were in FQPL1 2 years ago. I would expect 2 Qld sides to make the NSD and the smart money would be on Power and GC Knights, biggest hurdle they would have is stadiums, Power can overcome that by playing out of Dolphin Oval, I'm not sure where Knights could play to overcome the shortcomings of their home. If Lions (the biggest and best club in Qld) applies for the NST it will be them plus most likely Power - IMO If Lions don't apply then that tells us they looks at the economics of it project, and thought this is not gonna work? Considering they started Roar in the A-league, they'll know a thing or two how these "professional leagues" can go Yep. Food for thought. It's not just Lions either that may be making those considerations (I added another paragraph to my post above that crossed with your one here in relation to this) +x+x+xArguably the best 3 QLD clubs not interested? A worry for the NST. Not in the NPL era they aren't, best 4 clubs in the NPL Qld (particularly when the league opened up) have been Power, Lions, Olympic and GC Knights and at least 3 of those have put in an EOI and I wouldn't be surprised if Lions did put in an EOI. Strikers are an FQPL1 team as are Fire with their best days being pre NPL and City are an up and down side who look like they will have a good year but were in FQPL1 2 years ago. I would expect 2 Qld sides to make the NSD and the smart money would be on Power and GC Knights, biggest hurdle they would have is stadiums, Power can overcome that by playing out of Dolphin Oval, I'm not sure where Knights could play to overcome the shortcomings of their home. If memory serves me correctly, the last 3 Qld clubs that looked to applying for the A-League were Lions, Brisbane City and Strikers. They must have had the confidence, credentials and resources then, not to mention the history - but for some reason have not put up their hand (so far) despite a less demanding NST. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/may/25/fifteen-a-league-expansion-bids-confirmed-on-deadline-dayNo strikers or lions on this list. The Freo and West Adelaide bids still make me laugh. The 15 bids ACT: Canberra New South Wales: South-West Sydney (Liverpool), Southern Expansion (Sutherland-St George Illawarra), Wollongong Wolves, Macarthur (Campbelltown) Queensland: Brisbane City, Gold Coast United, Western Pride/Ipswich South Australia: West Adelaide Tasmania: State-wide Victoria: Team 11 (South-East Melbourne), South Melbourne, Western Melbourne, Belgravia Leisure Western Australia: Fremantle City
Fremantle City... :laugh: They just used this as a ploy to poach junior NPL players from other clubs in WA. " Come play for Fremantle, your son will be playing for us in the A-League in a few years. See, we even have a website saying so!". Sadly, there were parents who fell for it. I'm sure there are clubs doing the same thing now for the NST. Not just for juniors but also for their current NPL teams. "Join us this season for the NPL and you'll be playing in the second division next year"
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xArguably the best 3 QLD clubs not interested? A worry for the NST. Not in the NPL era they aren't, best 4 clubs in the NPL Qld (particularly when the league opened up) have been Power, Lions, Olympic and GC Knights and at least 3 of those have put in an EOI and I wouldn't be surprised if Lions did put in an EOI. Strikers are an FQPL1 team as are Fire with their best days being pre NPL and City are an up and down side who look like they will have a good year but were in FQPL1 2 years ago. I would expect 2 Qld sides to make the NSD and the smart money would be on Power and GC Knights, biggest hurdle they would have is stadiums, Power can overcome that by playing out of Dolphin Oval, I'm not sure where Knights could play to overcome the shortcomings of their home. If Lions (the biggest and best club in Qld) applies for the NST it will be them plus most likely Power - IMO If Lions don't apply then that tells us they looks at the economics of it project, and thought this is not gonna work? Considering they started Roar in the A-league, they'll know a thing or two how these "professional leagues" can go Yep. Food for thought. It's not just Lions either that may be making those considerations (I added another paragraph to my post above that crossed with your one here in relation to this) +x+x+xArguably the best 3 QLD clubs not interested? A worry for the NST. Not in the NPL era they aren't, best 4 clubs in the NPL Qld (particularly when the league opened up) have been Power, Lions, Olympic and GC Knights and at least 3 of those have put in an EOI and I wouldn't be surprised if Lions did put in an EOI. Strikers are an FQPL1 team as are Fire with their best days being pre NPL and City are an up and down side who look like they will have a good year but were in FQPL1 2 years ago. I would expect 2 Qld sides to make the NSD and the smart money would be on Power and GC Knights, biggest hurdle they would have is stadiums, Power can overcome that by playing out of Dolphin Oval, I'm not sure where Knights could play to overcome the shortcomings of their home. If memory serves me correctly, the last 3 Qld clubs that looked to applying for the A-League were Lions, Brisbane City and Strikers. They must have had the confidence, credentials and resources then, not to mention the history - but for some reason have not put up their hand (so far) despite a less demanding NST. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/may/25/fifteen-a-league-expansion-bids-confirmed-on-deadline-dayNo strikers or lions on this list. The Freo and West Adelaide bids still make me laugh. The 15 bids ACT: Canberra New South Wales: South-West Sydney (Liverpool), Southern Expansion (Sutherland-St George Illawarra), Wollongong Wolves, Macarthur (Campbelltown) Queensland: Brisbane City, Gold Coast United, Western Pride/Ipswich South Australia: West Adelaide Tasmania: State-wide Victoria: Team 11 (South-East Melbourne), South Melbourne, Western Melbourne, Belgravia Leisure Western Australia: Fremantle City
Fremantle City... :laugh: They just used this as a ploy to poach junior NPL players from other clubs in WA. " Come play for Fremantle, your son will be playing for us in the A-League in a few years. See, we even have a website saying so!". Sadly, there were parents who fell for it. I'm sure there are clubs doing the same thing now for the NST. Not just for juniors but also for their current NPL teams. "Join us this season for the NPL and you'll be playing in the second division next year" Wouldn't surprise me....... How do you think Aleague academies lure their players btw? or more accurately the parents of their players?
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xabsolutely and in todays way of "inclusion" and all the FA would need to be veryvery careful on the grounds why X large Club that measures up to all the requirements applicable being incl in the NST sure will need to have covered their backs (with their lawyers advise)........... Discrimination today is a lawsuit melting pot. Don't worry LFC, Im sure Nikou kept old Frank's notes on how to disguise racism ...
|
|
|
Glenardo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 137,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xabsolutely and in todays way of "inclusion" and all the FA would need to be veryvery careful on the grounds why X large Club that measures up to all the requirements applicable being incl in the NST sure will need to have covered their backs (with their lawyers advise)........... Discrimination today is a lawsuit melting pot. Don't worry LFC, Im sure Nikou kept old Frank's notes on how to disguise racism ... Imo they’d probably just not divulge the exact reasons why a club wasn’t selected, just like a restaurant isn’t going to openly tell an applicant they didn’t hire them to wait tables because they’re too ugly. They’ll just say “thanks for your application, unfortunately you were unsuccessful, better luck next time”
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xabsolutely and in todays way of "inclusion" and all the FA would need to be veryvery careful on the grounds why X large Club that measures up to all the requirements applicable being incl in the NST sure will need to have covered their backs (with their lawyers advise)........... Discrimination today is a lawsuit melting pot. Don't worry LFC, Im sure Nikou kept old Frank's notes on how to disguise racism ... 1. Pick clubs that can draw more than 3k people 2. Don’t pick clubs that don’t even bother to apply (ie South) 3, Pick clubs that dont play on cow paddocks Cunning strategy by Frank
|
|
|
PGR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 683,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xso SU58 have no chance in hell in being accepted because of the australia cup 22 final being still fresh in the mind Canberra deakin and Melbourne Knights won't be accepted for the Ustase loving supporters GCKnights need to be clean AF to be in as well (or merge with GC United) It does not look good for the picnic tableclothers as solo cubs Your comment itself is racist to all croatians as your painting everyone and every club in the same brush. I will guarantee you that 1 if not 2 croatian clubs will be accepted into the NSD. Exactly. Melbourne Knights will most likely be one of the stronger bids and it would be difficult to justify not letting them in if they tick all of the required boxes. That being said, if the FA are trying to decide between SU58 and another club, and they both have a similar spec'd application, I reckon the fan issues at the Australia Cup final may come into play. I also reckon the FA will actively limit the number of clubs they select that are associated with a single nationality. For example, I don't think we will see 4 Italian clubs, or 4 Greek clubs, or 4 Cro clubs, etc. I also reckon we won't see two clubs associated with the same nationality from the same state. Not saying that it's right, I'm just saying I reckon the FA will have that line of thinking. Either way, in a FA owned and operated league, all clubs are going to be held responsible for any questionable fan behavior. They will need to be prepared to accept sanctions, points deductions, etc if their fans behave in a way that the FA don't approve of. I think you are onto something. I also think that you can't have an NST with mono ethnic clubs that are overwhelmingly from just 3 nationalities, ala NSL. Won't work. Many will be disappointed.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
when is the deadline again? I guess we find out how many then
|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xwhen is the deadline again? I guess we find out how many then 20 feb was cut off to register and 3 march is deadline to submit the EOI Missing the 20 feb deadline doesn't really mean much. I understand you can still proceed to submitting an EOI without the previous registration.
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xArguably the best 3 QLD clubs not interested? A worry for the NST. Not in the NPL era they aren't, best 4 clubs in the NPL Qld (particularly when the league opened up) have been Power, Lions, Olympic and GC Knights and at least 3 of those have put in an EOI and I wouldn't be surprised if Lions did put in an EOI. Strikers are an FQPL1 team as are Fire with their best days being pre NPL and City are an up and down side who look like they will have a good year but were in FQPL1 2 years ago. I would expect 2 Qld sides to make the NSD and the smart money would be on Power and GC Knights, biggest hurdle they would have is stadiums, Power can overcome that by playing out of Dolphin Oval, I'm not sure where Knights could play to overcome the shortcomings of their home. If Lions (the biggest and best club in Qld) applies for the NST it will be them plus most likely Power - IMO If Lions don't apply then that tells us they looks at the economics of it project, and thought this is not gonna work? Considering they started Roar in the A-league, they'll know a thing or two how these "professional leagues" can go Yep. Food for thought. It's not just Lions either that may be making those considerations (I added another paragraph to my post above that crossed with your one here in relation to this) +x+x+xArguably the best 3 QLD clubs not interested? A worry for the NST. Not in the NPL era they aren't, best 4 clubs in the NPL Qld (particularly when the league opened up) have been Power, Lions, Olympic and GC Knights and at least 3 of those have put in an EOI and I wouldn't be surprised if Lions did put in an EOI. Strikers are an FQPL1 team as are Fire with their best days being pre NPL and City are an up and down side who look like they will have a good year but were in FQPL1 2 years ago. I would expect 2 Qld sides to make the NSD and the smart money would be on Power and GC Knights, biggest hurdle they would have is stadiums, Power can overcome that by playing out of Dolphin Oval, I'm not sure where Knights could play to overcome the shortcomings of their home. If memory serves me correctly, the last 3 Qld clubs that looked to applying for the A-League were Lions, Brisbane City and Strikers. They must have had the confidence, credentials and resources then, not to mention the history - but for some reason have not put up their hand (so far) despite a less demanding NST. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/may/25/fifteen-a-league-expansion-bids-confirmed-on-deadline-dayNo strikers or lions on this list. The Freo and West Adelaide bids still make me laugh. The 15 bids ACT: Canberra New South Wales: South-West Sydney (Liverpool), Southern Expansion (Sutherland-St George Illawarra), Wollongong Wolves, Macarthur (Campbelltown) Queensland: Brisbane City, Gold Coast United, Western Pride/Ipswich South Australia: West Adelaide Tasmania: State-wide Victoria: Team 11 (South-East Melbourne), South Melbourne, Western Melbourne, Belgravia Leisure Western Australia: Fremantle City
Fremantle City... :laugh: They just used this as a ploy to poach junior NPL players from other clubs in WA. " Come play for Fremantle, your son will be playing for us in the A-League in a few years. See, we even have a website saying so!". Sadly, there were parents who fell for it. I'm sure there are clubs doing the same thing now for the NST. Not just for juniors but also for their current NPL teams. "Join us this season for the NPL and you'll be playing in the second division next year" Wouldn't surprise me....... How do you think Aleague academies lure their players btw? or more accurately the parents of their players? And if they're the parents of kids at CCM or Adelaide United they made the right choice
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xArguably the best 3 QLD clubs not interested? A worry for the NST. Not in the NPL era they aren't, best 4 clubs in the NPL Qld (particularly when the league opened up) have been Power, Lions, Olympic and GC Knights and at least 3 of those have put in an EOI and I wouldn't be surprised if Lions did put in an EOI. Strikers are an FQPL1 team as are Fire with their best days being pre NPL and City are an up and down side who look like they will have a good year but were in FQPL1 2 years ago. I would expect 2 Qld sides to make the NSD and the smart money would be on Power and GC Knights, biggest hurdle they would have is stadiums, Power can overcome that by playing out of Dolphin Oval, I'm not sure where Knights could play to overcome the shortcomings of their home. If Lions (the biggest and best club in Qld) applies for the NST it will be them plus most likely Power - IMO If Lions don't apply then that tells us they looks at the economics of it project, and thought this is not gonna work? Considering they started Roar in the A-league, they'll know a thing or two how these "professional leagues" can go Yep. Food for thought. It's not just Lions either that may be making those considerations (I added another paragraph to my post above that crossed with your one here in relation to this) +x+x+xArguably the best 3 QLD clubs not interested? A worry for the NST. Not in the NPL era they aren't, best 4 clubs in the NPL Qld (particularly when the league opened up) have been Power, Lions, Olympic and GC Knights and at least 3 of those have put in an EOI and I wouldn't be surprised if Lions did put in an EOI. Strikers are an FQPL1 team as are Fire with their best days being pre NPL and City are an up and down side who look like they will have a good year but were in FQPL1 2 years ago. I would expect 2 Qld sides to make the NSD and the smart money would be on Power and GC Knights, biggest hurdle they would have is stadiums, Power can overcome that by playing out of Dolphin Oval, I'm not sure where Knights could play to overcome the shortcomings of their home. If memory serves me correctly, the last 3 Qld clubs that looked to applying for the A-League were Lions, Brisbane City and Strikers. They must have had the confidence, credentials and resources then, not to mention the history - but for some reason have not put up their hand (so far) despite a less demanding NST. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/may/25/fifteen-a-league-expansion-bids-confirmed-on-deadline-dayNo strikers or lions on this list. The Freo and West Adelaide bids still make me laugh. The 15 bids ACT: Canberra New South Wales: South-West Sydney (Liverpool), Southern Expansion (Sutherland-St George Illawarra), Wollongong Wolves, Macarthur (Campbelltown) Queensland: Brisbane City, Gold Coast United, Western Pride/Ipswich South Australia: West Adelaide Tasmania: State-wide Victoria: Team 11 (South-East Melbourne), South Melbourne, Western Melbourne, Belgravia Leisure Western Australia: Fremantle City
Fremantle City... :laugh: They just used this as a ploy to poach junior NPL players from other clubs in WA. " Come play for Fremantle, your son will be playing for us in the A-League in a few years. See, we even have a website saying so!". Sadly, there were parents who fell for it. I'm sure there are clubs doing the same thing now for the NST. Not just for juniors but also for their current NPL teams. "Join us this season for the NPL and you'll be playing in the second division next year" Wouldn't surprise me....... How do you think Aleague academies lure their players btw? or more accurately the parents of their players? And if they're the parents of kids at CCM or Adelaide United they made the right choice 2 out of 12 aint bad I suppose :)
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xabsolutely and in todays way of "inclusion" and all the FA would need to be veryvery careful on the grounds why X large Club that measures up to all the requirements applicable being incl in the NST sure will need to have covered their backs (with their lawyers advise)........... Discrimination today is a lawsuit melting pot. Don't worry LFC, Im sure Nikou kept old Frank's notes on how to disguise racism ... 1. Pick clubs that can draw more than 3k people 2. Don’t pick clubs that don’t even bother to apply (ie South) 3, Pick clubs that dont play on cow paddocks Cunning strategy by Frank 1 . Well I guess most ISUZU ute clubs need not bother applying then. 2. Agreed. 3. See point 1.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xso SU58 have no chance in hell in being accepted because of the australia cup 22 final being still fresh in the mind Canberra deakin and Melbourne Knights won't be accepted for the Ustase loving supporters GCKnights need to be clean AF to be in as well (or merge with GC United) It does not look good for the picnic tableclothers as solo cubs Your comment itself is racist to all croatians as your painting everyone and every club in the same brush. I will guarantee you that 1 if not 2 croatian clubs will be accepted into the NSD. Exactly. Melbourne Knights will most likely be one of the stronger bids and it would be difficult to justify not letting them in if they tick all of the required boxes. That being said, if the FA are trying to decide between SU58 and another club, and they both have a similar spec'd application, I reckon the fan issues at the Australia Cup final may come into play. I also reckon the FA will actively limit the number of clubs they select that are associated with a single nationality. For example, I don't think we will see 4 Italian clubs, or 4 Greek clubs, or 4 Cro clubs, etc. I also reckon we won't see two clubs associated with the same nationality from the same state. Not saying that it's right, I'm just saying I reckon the FA will have that line of thinking. Either way, in a FA owned and operated league, all clubs are going to be held responsible for any questionable fan behavior. They will need to be prepared to accept sanctions, points deductions, etc if their fans behave in a way that the FA don't approve of. I think you are onto something. I also think that you can't have an NST with mono ethnic clubs that are overwhelmingly from just 3 nationalities, ala NSL. Won't work. Many will be disappointed. Agreed, they should have a quota 4 x Greek Clubs, 4 x Croatian clubs, 3 x Italian clubs, 1 x Maltese, 1 x Northern Macedonian, 1 x Turkish, 1 x Serbian and 1 x Albanian.....
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xso SU58 have no chance in hell in being accepted because of the australia cup 22 final being still fresh in the mind Canberra deakin and Melbourne Knights won't be accepted for the Ustase loving supporters GCKnights need to be clean AF to be in as well (or merge with GC United) It does not look good for the picnic tableclothers as solo cubs Your comment itself is racist to all croatians as your painting everyone and every club in the same brush. I will guarantee you that 1 if not 2 croatian clubs will be accepted into the NSD. Exactly. Melbourne Knights will most likely be one of the stronger bids and it would be difficult to justify not letting them in if they tick all of the required boxes. That being said, if the FA are trying to decide between SU58 and another club, and they both have a similar spec'd application, I reckon the fan issues at the Australia Cup final may come into play. I also reckon the FA will actively limit the number of clubs they select that are associated with a single nationality. For example, I don't think we will see 4 Italian clubs, or 4 Greek clubs, or 4 Cro clubs, etc. I also reckon we won't see two clubs associated with the same nationality from the same state. Not saying that it's right, I'm just saying I reckon the FA will have that line of thinking. Either way, in a FA owned and operated league, all clubs are going to be held responsible for any questionable fan behavior. They will need to be prepared to accept sanctions, points deductions, etc if their fans behave in a way that the FA don't approve of. I think you are onto something. I also think that you can't have an NST with mono ethnic clubs that are overwhelmingly from just 3 nationalities, ala NSL. Won't work. Many will be disappointed. Agreed, they should have a quota 4 x Greek Clubs, 4 x Croatian clubs, 3 x Italian clubs, 1 x Maltese, 1 x Northern Macedonian, 1 x Turkish, 1 x Serbian and 1 x Albanian..... You'd struggle to get to 3 Italian clubs these days.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xso SU58 have no chance in hell in being accepted because of the australia cup 22 final being still fresh in the mind Canberra deakin and Melbourne Knights won't be accepted for the Ustase loving supporters GCKnights need to be clean AF to be in as well (or merge with GC United) It does not look good for the picnic tableclothers as solo cubs Your comment itself is racist to all croatians as your painting everyone and every club in the same brush. I will guarantee you that 1 if not 2 croatian clubs will be accepted into the NSD. Exactly. Melbourne Knights will most likely be one of the stronger bids and it would be difficult to justify not letting them in if they tick all of the required boxes. That being said, if the FA are trying to decide between SU58 and another club, and they both have a similar spec'd application, I reckon the fan issues at the Australia Cup final may come into play. I also reckon the FA will actively limit the number of clubs they select that are associated with a single nationality. For example, I don't think we will see 4 Italian clubs, or 4 Greek clubs, or 4 Cro clubs, etc. I also reckon we won't see two clubs associated with the same nationality from the same state. Not saying that it's right, I'm just saying I reckon the FA will have that line of thinking. Either way, in a FA owned and operated league, all clubs are going to be held responsible for any questionable fan behavior. They will need to be prepared to accept sanctions, points deductions, etc if their fans behave in a way that the FA don't approve of. I think you are onto something. I also think that you can't have an NST with mono ethnic clubs that are overwhelmingly from just 3 nationalities, ala NSL. Won't work. Many will be disappointed. Agreed, they should have a quota 4 x Greek Clubs, 4 x Croatian clubs, 3 x Italian clubs, 1 x Maltese, 1 x Northern Macedonian, 1 x Turkish, 1 x Serbian and 1 x Albanian..... You'd struggle to get to 3 Italian clubs these days. Marconi, Apia, Adelaide City ---- fixed :)
|
|
|
someguyjc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xso SU58 have no chance in hell in being accepted because of the australia cup 22 final being still fresh in the mind Canberra deakin and Melbourne Knights won't be accepted for the Ustase loving supporters GCKnights need to be clean AF to be in as well (or merge with GC United) It does not look good for the picnic tableclothers as solo cubs Your comment itself is racist to all croatians as your painting everyone and every club in the same brush. I will guarantee you that 1 if not 2 croatian clubs will be accepted into the NSD. Exactly. Melbourne Knights will most likely be one of the stronger bids and it would be difficult to justify not letting them in if they tick all of the required boxes. That being said, if the FA are trying to decide between SU58 and another club, and they both have a similar spec'd application, I reckon the fan issues at the Australia Cup final may come into play. I also reckon the FA will actively limit the number of clubs they select that are associated with a single nationality. For example, I don't think we will see 4 Italian clubs, or 4 Greek clubs, or 4 Cro clubs, etc. I also reckon we won't see two clubs associated with the same nationality from the same state. Not saying that it's right, I'm just saying I reckon the FA will have that line of thinking. Either way, in a FA owned and operated league, all clubs are going to be held responsible for any questionable fan behavior. They will need to be prepared to accept sanctions, points deductions, etc if their fans behave in a way that the FA don't approve of. I think you are onto something. I also think that you can't have an NST with mono ethnic clubs that are overwhelmingly from just 3 nationalities, ala NSL. Won't work. Many will be disappointed. I couldn't care less what nationality clubs have association with. I just reckon the FA will walk that path and partially base their decision on some form of quotas. It should be whichever clubs can demonstrate they are most suitable.
|
|
|
Glenardo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 137,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xso SU58 have no chance in hell in being accepted because of the australia cup 22 final being still fresh in the mind Canberra deakin and Melbourne Knights won't be accepted for the Ustase loving supporters GCKnights need to be clean AF to be in as well (or merge with GC United) It does not look good for the picnic tableclothers as solo cubs Your comment itself is racist to all croatians as your painting everyone and every club in the same brush. I will guarantee you that 1 if not 2 croatian clubs will be accepted into the NSD. Exactly. Melbourne Knights will most likely be one of the stronger bids and it would be difficult to justify not letting them in if they tick all of the required boxes. That being said, if the FA are trying to decide between SU58 and another club, and they both have a similar spec'd application, I reckon the fan issues at the Australia Cup final may come into play. I also reckon the FA will actively limit the number of clubs they select that are associated with a single nationality. For example, I don't think we will see 4 Italian clubs, or 4 Greek clubs, or 4 Cro clubs, etc. I also reckon we won't see two clubs associated with the same nationality from the same state. Not saying that it's right, I'm just saying I reckon the FA will have that line of thinking. Either way, in a FA owned and operated league, all clubs are going to be held responsible for any questionable fan behavior. They will need to be prepared to accept sanctions, points deductions, etc if their fans behave in a way that the FA don't approve of. I think you are onto something. I also think that you can't have an NST with mono ethnic clubs that are overwhelmingly from just 3 nationalities, ala NSL. Won't work. Many will be disappointed. Agreed, they should have a quota 4 x Greek Clubs, 4 x Croatian clubs, 3 x Italian clubs, 1 x Maltese, 1 x Northern Macedonian, 1 x Turkish, 1 x Serbian and 1 x Albanian..... You'd struggle to get to 3 Italian clubs these days. Marconi, Apia, Adelaide City ---- fixed :) Correct. Forgive my assumption, but The above is a very Victorian perspective. Unfortunate what’s happened in melbourne re the merger and de merger of Italian clubs chart, that essentially killed the historic connection many people felt to said clubs. Many Italians in Melbourne who have historically been heavily involved in soccer don’t believe the current iteration of Brunswick juventus to be the “real” Brunswick juventus for example. But in nsw and south Australia to this day some of the strongest clubs are Italian
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
South Melbourne waiting for the grand entrance in the final week to express an interest.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSouth Melbourne waiting for the grand entrance in the final week to express an interest. Maybe we are not considering applying because there are too many "effnik" clubs already :)
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
what is the current list of eois?
|
|
|